Nursing NUR 501/600 DISCUSSION AND ASSIGNMENT

Drug PowerPoint Presentation

For this week you will present a voiceover Powerpoint presentation (with the video on) on your drug of choice. You are to be dressed in office attire. The purpose of the presentation is for you to educate your colleagues on the drug you have selected. The presentation must include information about the:

• Drug pharmacology, pharmacokinetics • Brand name • Generic name • Dosing • Indications for use • Side effects • Contraindications • Pregnancy class • You must also perform a cost analysis of the drug. • Provide a patient case study on a patient in which you would utilize the drug you

have selected and include at least two peer-reviewed evidence-based studies related to the drug.

• Describe the appropriate patient education.  • What is your role as a Nurse Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this

patient on your case study presentation? • Describe the monitoring and follow-up.

Submission Instructions:


• Voiceover Presentation is original work and logically organized in current APA style including citation of references.

• Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles within your work. 

• PowerPoint presentation with 10-15 slides, excluding the title slide and the reference slide.

• The presentation is clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.

• Complete and submit by 11:59 PM ET Sunday. • Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means

of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor.

• You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.

Grading Rubric 

Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

View Rubric Presentation Rubric

Presentation Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

Identification of Drug

4 pts Distinguished Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of all 5 areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand name, generic name, dosing, and indications for use.

3 pts Excellent Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of 4 areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand name, generic name, dosing, or indications for use.

2 pts Fair Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of 3 areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand name, generic name, dosing, or indications for use.

1 pts Poor Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of 2 areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand name, generic name, dosing, or indications for use.

/ 4 pts

Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/ Probelms

4 pts Distinguished Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of side effects, contraindications, cost analysis of the drug, and pregnancy class.

3 pts Excellent Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the side effects, contraindications, cost analysis of the drug, and pregnancy class.

2 pts Fair Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of side effects, contraindications, cost analysis of the drug, and pregnancy class.

1 pts Poor Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of side effects, contraindications, cost analysis of the drug, and pregnancy class.

/ 4 pts

Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding

4 pts Distinguished Provides thorough, competent, and interpretive responses to providing a patient case study on a patient in which you would utilize the drug you have selected and include at least two peer-reviewed evidence-based studies related to the drug and describing what is your role as a Nurse Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this patient on your case study presentation and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.

3 pts Excellent Provides competent and interpretive responses to providing a patient case study on a patient in which you would utilize the drug you have selected and include at least two peer-reviewed evidence-based studies related to the drug and describing what is your role as a Nurse Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this patient on your case study presentation and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

2 pts Fair Provides competent responses to providing a patient case study on a patient in which you would utilize the drug you have selected and include at least two peer- reviewed evidence-based studies related to the drug and describing what is your role as a Nurse Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this patient on your case study presentation, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

1 pts Poor Provides an unacceptable response to providing a patient case study on a patient in which you would utilize the drug you have selected and include at least two peer-reviewed evidence-based studies related to the drug and describing what is your role as a Nurse Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this patient on your case study presentation, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual

/ 4 pts

Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/ Literature

4 pts Distinguished Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.

3 pts Excellent Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

2 pts Fair Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

1 pts Poor Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.

/ 4 pts

Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines view longer

description

4 pts Full Marks Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.

3 pts Excellent Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

2 pts Fair Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

1 pts Poor Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

/ 4 pts

Total Points: 0

PowerPoint Presentation: Theoretical Framework to Support Evidence-Based Practice 

Goal:

The purpose of this assignment is to identify a theory or model which can be used as a framework for a future evidence-based project

Content Requirements: 

1. Review literature regarding issues or concerns within your selected area of advanced practice nursing.

2. Select a theory or model which is relevant to your selected area of advanced practice nursing.

3. Offer a meaningful context for evidence-based practice surrounding the issue or concern which you identified.

4. Identify and describe a theory or model, and explain its relevance to the issues or concerns within your selected area of advanced practice

5. Explain how the theory or model can be used as a framework to guide evidence-based practice to address the issue or concern, and discuss the unique insight or perspective offered through the application of this theory or model.

Submission Instructions:

• The PowerPoint presentation is original work and logically organized. It should consist of 10-15 slides excluding the title and reference.

• The PowerPoint presentation should be clear and easy to read. Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.

• The PowerPoint presentation should be formatted per APA guidelines and references should be current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions)

• Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA guidelines (the library has a copy of the 7th Edition APA Manual).

Grading Rubric 

Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

View Rubric

Presentation Rubric

Presentation Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

Identification of Main Issues/ Problems

4 pts Distinguished Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.

3 pts Excellent Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.

2 pts Fair Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

1 pts Poor Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

/ 4 pts

Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/ Probelms

4 pts Distinguished Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

3 pts Excellent Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.

2 pts Fair Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

1 pts Poor Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

/ 4 pts

Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding

4 pts Distinguished Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.

3 pts Excellent Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

2 pts Fair Provides a competent responses to all issues/ problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

1 pts Poor Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/ problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

/ 4 pts

Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/ Literature

4 pts Distinguished Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.

3 pts Excellent Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

2 pts Fair Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

1 pts Poor Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.

/ 4 pts

Choose a submission type

Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines view longer

description

4 pts Full Marks Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.

3 pts Excellent Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

2 pts Fair Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

1 pts Poor Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

/ 4 pts

Total Points: 0

Data/PresetImageFill3-26.jpg

Data/PresetImageFill2-25.jpg

Data/PresetImageFill1-24.jpg

Data/PresetImageFill5-28.jpg

Data/PresetImageFill4-27.jpg

Data/PresetImageFill0-23.jpg

Data/bullet_gbutton_gray-29.png

preview.jpg

 Principles of Research and Evidence-Based Practice

Discuss the principles of research and evidence-based practice and how to effectively implement them for advanced practice nurses.

 Submission Instructions:

• Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8 points.

• You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/ correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.) 

• All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

 Treatments for Gastrointestinal & Endocrine Disorders 

Based on Module 5: Lecture Materials & Resources and experience, please answer the following questions:

1. Describe diagnostic criteria for nausea and vomiting and treatment recommendations

2. Discuss symptoms of GERD, complications, and drug management 3. Compare and contrast Crohn's disease and Ulcerative colitis 4. Discuss Diabetes, its causes, symptoms, and treatment 

Submission Instructions:

• Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in the current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points. ◦ Each question must be answered individually as in bullet points. Not in

an essay format.  ◦ Example: Question 1, followed by the answer to question 1; Question 2,

followed by the answer to question 2; and so forth.  • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/

correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)  ◦ Your response should be at least 150 words.

• All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

Drug PowerPoint Presentation

For this week you will present a voiceover Powerpoint presentation (with the video on) on your drug of choice. You are to be dressed in office attire. The purpose of the presentation is for you to educate your colleagues on the drug you have selected. The presentation must include information about the:

• Drug pharmacology, pharmacokinetics • Brand name • Generic name • Dosing • Indications for use • Side effects • Contraindications • Pregnancy class • You must also perform a cost analysis of the drug. • Provide a patient case study on a patient in which you would utilize the drug you

have selected and include at least two peer-reviewed evidence-based studies related to the drug.

• Describe the appropriate patient education.  • What is your role as a Nurse Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this

patient on your case study presentation? • Describe the monitoring and follow-up.

Submission Instructions:


• Voiceover Presentation is original work and logically organized in current APA style including citation of references.

• Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles within your work. 

• PowerPoint presentation with 10-15 slides, excluding the title slide and the reference slide.

• The presentation is clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.

• Complete and submit by 11:59 PM ET Sunday. • Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means

of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor.

• You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.

Grading Rubric 

Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

View Rubric Presentation Rubric

Presentation Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

Identification of Drug

4 pts Distinguished Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of all 5 areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand name, generic name, dosing, and indications for use.

3 pts Excellent Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of 4 areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand name, generic name, dosing, or indications for use.

2 pts Fair Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of 3 areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand name, generic name, dosing, or indications for use.

1 pts Poor Identifies and demonstrates an understanding of 2 areas: drug pharmacology pharmacokinetics, brand name, generic name, dosing, or indications for use.

/ 4 pts

Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/ Probelms

4 pts Distinguished Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of side effects, contraindications, cost analysis of the drug, and pregnancy class.

3 pts Excellent Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the side effects, contraindications, cost analysis of the drug, and pregnancy class.

2 pts Fair Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of side effects, contraindications, cost analysis of the drug, and pregnancy class.

1 pts Poor Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of side effects, contraindications, cost analysis of the drug, and pregnancy class.

/ 4 pts

Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding

4 pts Distinguished Provides thorough, competent, and interpretive responses to providing a patient case study on a patient in which you would utilize the drug you have selected and include at least two peer-reviewed evidence-based studies related to the drug and describing what is your role as a Nurse Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this patient on your case study presentation and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.

3 pts Excellent Provides competent and interpretive responses to providing a patient case study on a patient in which you would utilize the drug you have selected and include at least two peer-reviewed evidence-based studies related to the drug and describing what is your role as a Nurse Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this patient on your case study presentation and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

2 pts Fair Provides competent responses to providing a patient case study on a patient in which you would utilize the drug you have selected and include at least two peer- reviewed evidence-based studies related to the drug and describing what is your role as a Nurse Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this patient on your case study presentation, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

1 pts Poor Provides an unacceptable response to providing a patient case study on a patient in which you would utilize the drug you have selected and include at least two peer-reviewed evidence-based studies related to the drug and describing what is your role as a Nurse Practitioner for prescribing this medication to this patient on your case study presentation, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual

/ 4 pts

Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/ Literature

4 pts Distinguished Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.

3 pts Excellent Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

2 pts Fair Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

1 pts Poor Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.

/ 4 pts

Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines view longer

description

4 pts Full Marks Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.

3 pts Excellent Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

2 pts Fair Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

1 pts Poor Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

/ 4 pts

Total Points: 0

PowerPoint Presentation: Theoretical Framework to Support Evidence-Based Practice 

Goal:

The purpose of this assignment is to identify a theory or model which can be used as a framework for a future evidence-based project

Content Requirements: 

1. Review literature regarding issues or concerns within your selected area of advanced practice nursing.

2. Select a theory or model which is relevant to your selected area of advanced practice nursing.

3. Offer a meaningful context for evidence-based practice surrounding the issue or concern which you identified.

4. Identify and describe a theory or model, and explain its relevance to the issues or concerns within your selected area of advanced practice

5. Explain how the theory or model can be used as a framework to guide evidence-based practice to address the issue or concern, and discuss the unique insight or perspective offered through the application of this theory or model.

Submission Instructions:

• The PowerPoint presentation is original work and logically organized. It should consist of 10-15 slides excluding the title and reference.

• The PowerPoint presentation should be clear and easy to read. Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.

• The PowerPoint presentation should be formatted per APA guidelines and references should be current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions)

• Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA guidelines (the library has a copy of the 7th Edition APA Manual).

Grading Rubric 

Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

View Rubric

Presentation Rubric

Presentation Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

Identification of Main Issues/ Problems

4 pts Distinguished Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.

3 pts Excellent Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.

2 pts Fair Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

1 pts Poor Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

/ 4 pts

Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/ Probelms

4 pts Distinguished Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

3 pts Excellent Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.

2 pts Fair Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

1 pts Poor Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

/ 4 pts

Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding

4 pts Distinguished Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.

3 pts Excellent Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

2 pts Fair Provides a competent responses to all issues/ problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

1 pts Poor Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/ problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

/ 4 pts

Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/ Literature

4 pts Distinguished Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.

3 pts Excellent Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

2 pts Fair Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

1 pts Poor Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.

/ 4 pts

Choose a submission type

Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines view longer

description

4 pts Full Marks Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.

3 pts Excellent Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

2 pts Fair Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

1 pts Poor Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

/ 4 pts

Total Points: 0