Nursing homework

profiletravuco03
Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework help
MastersPMHNP
  • a year ago
  • 15
Report issue
files (1)

Module3discussioninstructions.docx

Module 3 Discussion

This is my PICO question

In adults with Schizotypal Personality Disorder (STPD) receiving outpatient psychiatric care, how does Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) compared to Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) affect social anxiety symptoms?

Professor instructions

You must include it in each discussion and the academic abstract. Your literature review must consist of only US-based research. You must include only Level 1 or 2 research addressing your intervention and comparison groups.

   null

icon     Selecting Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

After studying  Module 3: Lecture Materials & Resources , discuss the following:

·

1. Describe the inclusion/exclusion criteria used to fine-tune the evidence-based research for your selected PICO question using the table below.  See the example below:

Database Searched

Search Terms / Keywords

Boolean Operators Used

Limits / Filters Applied

Number of Results Found

PubMed

“generalized anxiety disorder” AND “DBT”

AND

Published in the last 5 years; English only

182

CINAHL

“depression” OR “major depressive disorder” AND “benzodiazepines”

OR, AND

Adults; peer-reviewed; English

245

· 2.  Discuss the databases searched and the process used to gather the evidence-based research for your selected PICO question. 

· 3.  Full points for the main issues section of the rubric will be given for including:

. Database Searched List each database used (e.g., PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library).

. Search Terms / Keywords Include specific keywords or subject headings used for your search.

. Boolean Operators Used Note how you combined terms (e.g., AND, OR, NOT).

. Limits / Filters Applied Describe any filters (e.g., date range, language, human subjects, age group).

. Number of Results Found Report how many articles were retrieved in each search.

Submission Instructions:

. Your initial post, question 2, should be at least 250 words, formatted and cited in the current APA style.

. Provide support for your work from at least five academic sources less than 5 years old. Visit  Purdue OwlLinks to an external site.  for specific examples on how to create in-text citations and cite references using the current APA format.

. Students will use this PICO question when creating the abstract and academic poster.

. Students may not duplicate the PICO question of another student at St. Thomas University.

. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

. You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points. (1 point per response)

. All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible. 

. Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.

. You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.

· Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

Discussion Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Points

Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts

Distinguished - 4 points Post is substantively accurate. Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Provides exceptional and thought-provoking analysis that directly addresses details and/or examples of the main topic.

Excellent - 3 points Post is mostly related to the topic. Demonstrates understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. It provides some supporting details and/or examples. Analyses not as clear as they could be.

Fair - 1-2 points Demonstrates limited understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. No details and/or examples are given.

Poor - 0 points Post is off-topic, incorrect and/or irrelevant to the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Analyses are not well organized or clear.

4 points

APA Formatting Guidelines

Distinguished - 2 points The reference page contains at least the required current scholarly academic reference and text reference. Follows APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations.

Excellent - 1 point The reference page contains one current scholarly academic resource and text reference. Follows most APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations.

Fair - 0.5 points The reference page contains one current or outdated scholarly academic resource. Many errors of APA guidelines: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations.

Poor - 0 points The reference page contains no current scholarly academic resources, only internet web pages, or no reference page. Lack of APA guidelines for references provided or in-text citations.

2 points

Writing Mechanics

Distinguished - 2 points Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.

Excellent - 1 point Few grammatical errors, but sentences could be clearer and more precise.

Fair - 0.5 points The paper contains a few grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.

Poor - 0 points The paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.

2 points

Response to Posts of Peers

Distinguished - 2 points Constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal to each.

Fair - 1 point Constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal.

Poor - 0 points Provided no response to a peer's post.

 

2 points

Total Points 

10

image1.png

image2.png