Nursing assignment 6 nur 602
yari02
9 days ago
10
files (1)assignment6instructions.docx
assignment6instructions.docx
Thriving Work Environments & Interprofessional Collaboration for Patient Safety
Purpose:
To describe strategies for a motivating work environment and explore rewards and positive reinforcement as a manager in an organization. This assessment will develop your understanding of the importance of interprofessional collaboration in creating quality outcomes in healthcare delivery.
Instructions:
Create a presentation that explores how you would establish a motivating work environment in a healthcare setting that fosters innovation, creativity, and employee empowerment. In your presentation, address the following:
· Motivating Environment: Outline strategies to create a work environment that encourages innovation and creativity among healthcare professionals.
· Incentives and Rewards: Discuss various incentive and reward systems, with a particular focus on individualized approaches, as highlighted in your readings. Explain how these rewards can motivate employees and contribute to a culture of continuous improvement.
· Interprofessional Collaboration: Describe how promoting collaboration among healthcare teams can improve patient outcomes and support quality control. Emphasize the importance of teamwork in fostering a culture of patient safety.
· Application to Patient Safety: Demonstrate how these strategies will contribute to creating a safer and more effective healthcare environment.
Submission Instructions:
· The power point presentation is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
· The presentation should be formatted per current APA and 8-10 slides in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page. Incorporate a minimum of 5 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
· Your assignment will be reviewed for plagiarism with Turnitin.
· All paragraphs must have at least 5 sentences.
· All references must have “doi” if applicable
· All references must be cited
· Turnitin similarity report must be less than 5%
· No AI detectable, no plagiarism.
Grading Rubric
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.
Presentation Rubric (1)
|
Presentation Rubric (1) |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Points |
|
Identification of Main Issues/Problems |
Distinguished Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems. 10 to >7.5 pts Excellent Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems. 7.5 to >5 pts Fair Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems. 5 to >2.5 pts Poor Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems. 2.5 to >0 pts |
/10 pts |
|
Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms |
Distinguished Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. 10 to >7.5 pts Excellent Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems. 7.5 to >5 pts Fair Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. 5 to >2.5 pts Poor Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. 2.5 to >0 pts |
/10 pts |
|
Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding |
Distinguished Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding. 10 to >7.5 pts Excellent Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding. 7.5 to >5 pts Fair Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. 5 to >2.5 pts Poor Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. 2.5 to >0 pts |
/10 pts |
|
Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature |
Distinguished Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. 10 to >7.5 pts Excellent Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. 7.5 to >5 pts Fair Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. 5 to >2.5 pts Poor Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. 2.5 to >0 pts |
/10 pts |
|
Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines view longer description |
Distinguished Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors. 10 to >7.5 pts Excellent Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. 7.5 to >5 pts Fair Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. 5 to >2.5 pts Poor Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. 2.5 to >0 pts |
/10 pts |
· Your assignment will be reviewed for plagiarism with Turnitin.
· All paragraphs must have at least 5 sentences.
· All references must have “doi” if applicable
· All references must be cited
· Turnitin similarity report must be less than 5%
· No AI detectable, no plagiarism.
image1.png
assignment6instructions.docx
Thriving Work Environments & Interprofessional Collaboration for Patient Safety
Purpose:
To describe strategies for a motivating work environment and explore rewards and positive reinforcement as a manager in an organization. This assessment will develop your understanding of the importance of interprofessional collaboration in creating quality outcomes in healthcare delivery.
Instructions:
Create a presentation that explores how you would establish a motivating work environment in a healthcare setting that fosters innovation, creativity, and employee empowerment. In your presentation, address the following:
· Motivating Environment: Outline strategies to create a work environment that encourages innovation and creativity among healthcare professionals.
· Incentives and Rewards: Discuss various incentive and reward systems, with a particular focus on individualized approaches, as highlighted in your readings. Explain how these rewards can motivate employees and contribute to a culture of continuous improvement.
· Interprofessional Collaboration: Describe how promoting collaboration among healthcare teams can improve patient outcomes and support quality control. Emphasize the importance of teamwork in fostering a culture of patient safety.
· Application to Patient Safety: Demonstrate how these strategies will contribute to creating a safer and more effective healthcare environment.
Submission Instructions:
· The power point presentation is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
· The presentation should be formatted per current APA and 8-10 slides in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page. Incorporate a minimum of 5 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
· Your assignment will be reviewed for plagiarism with Turnitin.
· All paragraphs must have at least 5 sentences.
· All references must have “doi” if applicable
· All references must be cited
· Turnitin similarity report must be less than 5%
· No AI detectable, no plagiarism.
Grading Rubric
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.
Presentation Rubric (1)
|
Presentation Rubric (1) |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Points |
|
Identification of Main Issues/Problems |
Distinguished Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems. 10 to >7.5 pts Excellent Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems. 7.5 to >5 pts Fair Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems. 5 to >2.5 pts Poor Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems. 2.5 to >0 pts |
/10 pts |
|
Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms |
Distinguished Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. 10 to >7.5 pts Excellent Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems. 7.5 to >5 pts Fair Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. 5 to >2.5 pts Poor Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. 2.5 to >0 pts |
/10 pts |
|
Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding |
Distinguished Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding. 10 to >7.5 pts Excellent Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding. 7.5 to >5 pts Fair Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. 5 to >2.5 pts Poor Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. 2.5 to >0 pts |
/10 pts |
|
Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature |
Distinguished Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. 10 to >7.5 pts Excellent Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. 7.5 to >5 pts Fair Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. 5 to >2.5 pts Poor Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. 2.5 to >0 pts |
/10 pts |
|
Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines view longer description |
Distinguished Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors. 10 to >7.5 pts Excellent Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. 7.5 to >5 pts Fair Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. 5 to >2.5 pts Poor Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. 2.5 to >0 pts |
/10 pts |
· Your assignment will be reviewed for plagiarism with Turnitin.
· All paragraphs must have at least 5 sentences.
· All references must have “doi” if applicable
· All references must be cited
· Turnitin similarity report must be less than 5%
· No AI detectable, no plagiarism.
image1.png
- PROF ANN IP2 ETHIC
- ASB financial reporting requirements for a private college.
- 1000 report about use of mobile in male and female colleges
- Old Faithful Geyser in Yellowstone National Park is renowned, among other things, for the regularity of its eruptions. The eruption durations (X, in minutes) and the subsequent intervals before the next eruption (Y, in minutes) are provided in a separate
- **KIM WOODS** question
- Ethics Case Study
- Unit 1 Discussion 2: Sociological Thinking
- dynamics homework help
- what is buddism
- Health Admin Questions
