nursing

profileraiseluv
Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework help
new tech
  • 2 months ago
  • 15
Report issue
files (1)

WK8instructions.docx

In this Assignment, you will review four (4) existing research  focused on the application of clinical systems and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.  Read the assignment instructions and rubric carefully.

In a 4- to 5-page paper,  synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as  an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:

· Identify the four (4) peer-reviewed, current (published within the last 5 years), scholarly articles. The research  should provide evidence to support the use of  one type of  clinical system to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies. Cite each in APA format.

Examples:

·

· Use of virtual reality exposure therapy for patients with PTSD, for pain management, or neurorehabilitation

· Use of remote patient monitoring for patients on home dialysis monitoring

· Use of continuous glucose monitors for diabetes management

· Use of CDSS in sepsis management

· Use of EHR ED tracking board for improving ED throughput

· Include  an introduction explaining the purpose of the paper.

· Summarize  each study.  Avoid direct quotations.  Paraphrase, explain, and integrate information obtained from peer-reviewed research with appropriate citation to demonstrate your knowledge, synthesis, and critical thinking.

· For each study,  explain the improvement  to outcomes, efficiencies, and reflect on  lessons learned from the application of the clinical system. Be specific and provide examples.

· In your  conclusion, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles.

· Use APA format and include a title page.

· For information about  annotated bibliographies, visit  https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writing/apa/annotated-bibliographiesLinks to an external site.

Use appropriate  APA headings to organize your paper by topics and subtopics. Proofread for any grammar, spacing, citation, and reference list APA issues. Below are helpful links:

https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/literaturereviewLinks to an external site.

https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/evidenceLinks to an external site.

https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/referencesLinks to an external site.

https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/citationsLinks to an external site.

NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:· Properly identify 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed.

20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response identifies 4 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment.

17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe response identifies 3 peer-reviewed research articles and one peer-reviewed article for the Assignment.

15 to >13.0 ptsFairThe response identifies 4 or less peer-reviewed articles

13 to >0 ptsPoorThe response identifies less than 4 peer-reviewed articles or peer-reviewed articles are missing

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.

40 to >35.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and thoroughly summarizes in detail each study reviewed, explaining in detail the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described....Specific, accurate, and detailed examples are provided which fully support the response.

35 to >31.0 ptsGoodThe response summarizes each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described....Accurate examples are provided which support the response provided.

31 to >27.0 ptsFairThe response is missing one or two of the required elements or summaries are superficially addressed.

27 to >0 ptsPoorThe response is missing three or more required elements or the summaries are superficially addressed.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles in a cohesive conclusion.

25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentResponse includes a synthesis of the findings in an exceptionally well-written conclusion.

22 to >19.0 ptsGoodResponse includes a synthesis of the findings in a well-written conclusion.

19 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response is missing a synthesis of the findings or the conclusion is superficial.

17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response is missing a synthesis of the findings and the conclusion is not accurate or is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4 to >3.0 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3 to >2.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

2 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3-4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100