needs HCM
follow all directions
2 years ago
10
MilestoneTwoGuidelinesandRubric-HCM-700-11134-M01HealthcareAdminCapstone2024D-3Jul-Oct.pdf
11923-HCM700FinalProjectMilestoneOne.docx
MilestoneTwoGuidelinesandRubric-HCM-700-11134-M01HealthcareAdminCapstone2024D-3Jul-Oct.pdf
HCM 700 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric
Prompt
For Milestone Two, you will submit a dra� of your proposed needs assessment. You should include a statement of need that allows the reader to learn more about your selected issue,
presents evidence that supports the need for your program, and demonstrates that your organiza�on understands the need and can address the issue. If the issue involves a specific affected
popula�on(s), such as employees or pa�ents, be sure to iden�fy that popula�on’s specific needs. Using what you learned about management theories in Module Two, discuss specific
management theories that guided your iden�fica�on of the issue.
Specifically, the following cri�cal elements must be addressed:
II. Proposal Needs Assessment
Develop a statement of need that allows the reader to learn more about your selected issue, presents evidence that supports the need for your proposal, and demonstrates that your
organiza�on understands the need and can address the issue. If the issue involves a specific affected popula�on(s), such as employees or pa�ents, be sure to iden�fy that popula�on’s
specific needs. Refer to the Module Two resources to discuss specific management theories that will be useful for solving the issue.
What to Submit
The dra� of your Needs Assessment must be submi�ed as a 2- to 3-page Microso� Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins, and any
references cited in APA format. Use appropriate headings to iden�fy each cri�cal element.
Milestone Two Rubric
Criteria Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Proposal Needs Assessment:
Statement of Need
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
provides a statement of need
with a high level of detail
Iden�fies the need or issue to
be explored
Iden�fies the need or issue to
be explored but does not
include sufficient detail
Does not include a statement
of need
30
Proposal Needs Assessment:
Evidence
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
demonstrates an insigh�ul
understanding of the evidence
Presents evidence that
supports the need for the
program and demonstrates an
understanding of the need
Presents evidence that
supports the need for the
program but does not
demonstrate an understanding
of the need
Does not present evidence that
supports the need for the
program
30
Criteria Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Proposal Needs Assessment:
Management Theories
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
supports the assessment with
appropriate management
theories
Discusses specific management
theories and how they apply to
the issues
Discusses specific management
theories but not how they
apply to the issues
Does not discuss specific
management theories
30
Ar�cula�on of Response Submission is free of errors
related to cita�ons, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
organiza�on and is presented
in a professional and easy-to-
read format
Submission has no major errors
related to cita�ons, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organiza�on
Submission has major errors
related to cita�ons, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organiza�on
that nega�vely impact
readability and ar�cula�on of
main ideas
Submission has cri�cal errors
related to cita�ons, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organiza�on
that prevent understanding of
ideas
10
Total: 100%
11923-HCM700FinalProjectMilestoneOne.docx
Milestone One: Introduction 1
Milestone One: Introduction 3
Milestone One: Introduction
Precious Teasley
HCM-700
August 19,2024
Dr. Urmala Roopnarinesingh
The last capstone project centers on increasing care delivery to patients with sickle cell disease through increasing the awareness of physicians, availing specialized care centers and formulating policies that will help eradicate stigma. Sickle cell disease is a substantial healthcare concern and disproportionately affects minorities. New medical discoveries of the disease show that patients with sickle cell disease continue to receive substandard treatment since physicians do not know much about the illness, few medical centers offer special treatment and negative prejudices still exist. This project will endeavour to develop an integrated strategy for these problems and, in so doing, enhance the quality of care received by these patients.
Introduction
Problem Statement
The care provided to patients with sickle cell disease is often compromised by several key issues: lack of education and information among the physicians, the lack of access to such a specialist, and the negative influence of stereotyping in the healthcare sector. These factors hinder global health goals by leading to poor health outcomes and less patient satisfaction. Indeed, according to the literature discovered for the study, including the recent work of Masese et al. (2029), physicians often lack adequate knowledge on the subject relating to sickle cell disease, so they end up being very slow to correctly diagnose the disease and develop proper management strategies. Furthermore, patients' awareness of specialized health care is a major concern because of the insufficient receipt of such services as a result of the patient's condition. The continued reinforcement of stereotypes around the illness, especially within minorities, further complicates the already difficult scenario by influencing both the care that patients receive and their experiences (Masese et al., 2019). This proposal aims to remedy these problems through the evaluation of the raised awareness level of physicians, the availability of speciality services, and the implementation of policies that ban prejudice. The aim is to provide a single and comprehensive service that will tackle the complex needs associated with sickle cell disease, thus enhancing the quality of caring for such patients and their satisfaction.
Overview of the Issue
Sickle cell disease is an inherited disease that has been known to be prevalent in African Americans and other minority group. Pain, hospitalizations, and a shortened life span are symptoms associated with the disease. Nevertheless, sickle cell disease remains relatively unnoticed and untreated because many healthcare practitioners remain unaware of the condition. As highlighted by Mburu and Odame (2019), the disease has enormous implications for the health of the population, as many exposed individuals develop complications that can lead to high mortality. In addition, the state's healthcare system, for example, lacks insurance coverage and restricts access to specialized healthcare, which only adds to the patients' burdens.
Other research scholars such as Pecker and Lanzkron (2021) opine that insurance reimbursement policies for healthcare mostly fail to cater for the costs of various necessary treatments hence straining the individuals' pockets and the limited accessibility of the services. Systematic prejudice still prevails in the healthcare system and announces itself in disparities that lead to instrumental patient mistreatment and deprivation of a positive perception of the care-receiving experience. It is, therefore, important that these concerns be addressed to enhance the quality of health of those affected with sickle cell disease and to improve the overall efficiencies of the general healthcare system. Consequently, this particular project will entail an evaluation of the current challenges and come up with solutions to the existing problem.
Target Audience
This proposal is intended for the hospital's chief executive officers, medical directors, and policymakers in the health sector. Strategic to their role, these stakeholders are instrumental in driving the change to make the care of SCD patients better. This project's findings could be useful to hospital administrators in making wise decisions that uphold ethical standards to improve patients' safety and care. This proposal seeks to enhance physicians' awareness, enhance accessibility to speciality care, and erase stereotype policies so that healthcare executives and policymakers will embrace and support the needs of patients with sickle cell disease, especially in order to improve health outcomes and satisfaction among the patients.
References
Masese, R. V., Bulgin, D., Douglas, C., Shah, N., & Tanabe, P. (2019). Barriers and facilitators to care for individuals with sickle cell disease in central North Carolina: the emergency department providers’ perspective. PLoS One, 14(5), e0216414. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216414
Mburu, J., & Odame, I. (2019). Sickle cell disease: Reducing the global disease burden. International journal of laboratory haematology, 41, 82-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.13023
Pecker, L. H., & Lanzkron, S. (2021). Sickle cell disease. Annals of Internal Medicine, 174(1), ITC1-ITC16. https://doi.org/10.7326/AITC202101190