Need Writing Help (ABWk2)

Opposing Annotated Bibliography

Topic Chosen: the effectiveness of transformational leadership over transactional leadership in driving organizational success. You will use  the same topic that you selected in Week 1 for this annotated bibliography.  If you want to change topics, you will need to contact your professor immediately so that your new topic can be approved.  Continue your search in the institution library and find three peer-reviewed and full-text articles that oppose your stance and submit this bibliography below.  (Non-credible sources, like newspapers, should not be used and will not count as one of the required sources.  Try to use ProQuest: make sure to select full text and peer-reviewed,)  This is the start of the body of your research paper.  Make sure to summarize each article in paragraph form (not bulleted), specifically indicating how the authors' conclusions oppose your point of view on the topic.  Discuss the inferences the authors made in these articles to reach their conclusion.  You should start to think about why you oppose their views and how this might strengthen your rough draft.

Your submission will include

· Three separate paragraphs (4-8 sentences per paragraph).

· Each paragraph will present a summary of the articles, why you selected your opposing sources, any inferences that you arrived at, etc.  Follow the format for the annotated bibliography (see links below)

· https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/annotated_bibliographies/annotated_bibliography_samples.html

· https://irsc.libguides.com/mla/annotatedbibliography

· at least 500 words of total text for the entire paper (your sources do not count as text) 

· MLA formatting throughout (check out the Student Resources and OwlPurdue.edu for helpful information):

· sources

· double spaced

· Times New Roman

· 12 point

· header 

· pagination, etc

LDR 201 Annotated Bibliography-Weeks 2

Criteria	10 points
New Discussion Topic (Content)	All three required articles were summarized and had sufficient detail.
Criteria	5 points
Overall Mechanics/ Professionalism	No significant errors in mechanics or professionalism. Follows the conventions of written English.
Criteria	5 points
Use of Scholarly Sources	At least three scholarly sources were used appropriately
Criteria	10 points
Citation of Scholarly Sources (including in-text citations)	All sources were properly cited following MLA formatting.
Criteria	10 points
Length (this excludes the Works Cited page)	500+ words of text
Criteria	10 points
Similarity Index (this excludes the Works Cited page)	20% and below