Need Writing Assistance 9.21.2023

Law101

Main

Home >Homework Answsers >Government homework help

Please see attachments

3 years ago
21.09.2023
35

Report issue

files (3)

HSE350CASESTUDYWEEK6.docx
HSE400CaseStudyWeek6.docx
JohnDoeIncvMukasey.rtf

HSE350CASESTUDYWEEK6.docx

Week 6: Case Study Comparative Essay

For the week 6 comparative essay, you will write a 1,000 word comparative easy in APA 7 format with proper citations. The essay will compare and contrast two state governance polices from the required reading:

· https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-governance

A rubric for the project is attached for your review before composing your essay.

Wk 6 Comparative Essay Rubric

CATEGORY	Meets the Standard	Exceeds the Standard
	20 points	40 points
Purpose & Supporting Details	The paper compares and contrasts points clearly, but the supporting information is general, and/or the points are basic. The paper includes only the information relevant to the comparison.	The paper clearly compares and contrasts points that are sophisticated, offers specific examples to illustrate the comparison, and includes only the information relevant to the comparison.
	15 points	30 points
Organization & Structure	The paper breaks the information into point-by-point structure but may not follow a consistent order when discussing the comparison.	The paper breaks the information into point-by-point structure. It follows a consistent order when discussing the comparison.
	5 points	10 points
Transitions	The paper moves from one idea to the next but may lack or misuse transition words to show relationships between ideas.	The paper moves smoothly from one idea to the next and uses transition words and subtle transitions to show relationships between ideas.
	10 points	20 points
Grammar & Spelling (Conventions)	Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.	Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.

HSE400CaseStudyWeek6.docx

HSE 400

Week 6 Case Study

Listed below are topics I would like for you to discuss. Refer to the textbook, weekly materials, and/or the GMC library when researching the topics for this Discussion Forum. Put your writing into your own words, do not copy directly from the source. If you incorporate external links be sure to cite them properly. Lastly, review how to paraphrase and quote resources before you begin posting.

· Case: John Doe, Inc. v. Mukasey, 549 F.3d 861 (2008) (Attached)

· Compose a case study on the importance of the Appellate Court’s decision to affirm part of the appeal, but remand another section of the lawsuit.

· Was it the correct decision in your opinion?

· Justify your position.

· Describe the importance of NSLs and whether they are worth the possible cost of violating the first amendment.

Some Approved External Website(s): The following optional learning resources contain approved external websites that may be used to assist you in gaining a deeper understanding of the material presented in this weeks lesson. They are categorized by the student learning objectives in this week. Please take advantage of this opportunity to expand your knowledge with the material provided.

Aryanfard, O. (n.d.). National Security. https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1134/national-security.

Click https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1134/national-security link to open resource.

John Doe, Inc. v. Mukasey, 549 F.3d 861 (2d Cir. 2008 ). American Association Of University Professors (AAUP). (n.d.). https://www.aaup.org/brief/john-doe-inc-v-mukasey-549-f3d-861-2d-cir-2008.

Click https://www.aaup.org/brief/john-doe-inc-v-mukasey-549-f3d-861-2d-cir-2008 link to open resource.

APA Format, 500 words

See Rubric Below

Wk 3 & 6 Case Study Rubric

Criteria	20 points	26 points
Substance of Brief	2 components were addressed properly	All 3 components of the brief were addressed properly
Criteria	16 points	24 points
Opinion Component	Opinion points were apparent with some supporting details provided that demonstrated some critical thinking. Includes factual inferences that are not supported. Lacks a sophisticated tone, but is readable and understandable.	Opinion points were well developed with substantial, relevant supporting details that demonstrated critical thinking. Includes facts that are important to the analysis and conclusion. The opinion is concise, and the reader has all necessary information.
Criteria	12 points	14 Points
APA Style: In-Text Citations and References	APA style was used with some errors. Some in-text citations conform to APA style AND/OR some references are cited correctly AND/OR there is some accuracy between in-text citations and the references.	APA style was mostly used accurately and consistently. Most or all in-text citations conform to APA style. Most or all references are cited correctly. There is accuracy between in-text citations and the references.
Criteria	12 points	18 points
Overall Mechanics / Professionalism	Case study contained some APA, grammatical, spelling, capitalization, and/or punctuation errors, distracting from professionalism. (3 to 5 errors)	Case study was written in a professional manner using APA guidelines and were mostly free of grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors. (Less than 3 errors)
Criteria	6 points	8 points	12 points	14 points	18 points
Length	Case Study was between 300-349 words	Case Study was between 350-399 words	Case Study was between 400- 449 words	Case Study was between 450- 499 words	Case Study was 500 words

HSE350CASESTUDYWEEK6.docx

Week 6: Case Study Comparative Essay

· https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-governance

A rubric for the project is attached for your review before composing your essay.

Wk 6 Comparative Essay Rubric

CATEGORY	Meets the Standard	Exceeds the Standard
	20 points	40 points
Purpose & Supporting Details	The paper compares and contrasts points clearly, but the supporting information is general, and/or the points are basic. The paper includes only the information relevant to the comparison.	The paper clearly compares and contrasts points that are sophisticated, offers specific examples to illustrate the comparison, and includes only the information relevant to the comparison.
	15 points	30 points
Organization & Structure	The paper breaks the information into point-by-point structure but may not follow a consistent order when discussing the comparison.	The paper breaks the information into point-by-point structure. It follows a consistent order when discussing the comparison.
	5 points	10 points
Transitions	The paper moves from one idea to the next but may lack or misuse transition words to show relationships between ideas.	The paper moves smoothly from one idea to the next and uses transition words and subtle transitions to show relationships between ideas.
	10 points	20 points
Grammar & Spelling (Conventions)	Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.	Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.

HSE400CaseStudyWeek6.docx

HSE 400

Week 6 Case Study

· Case: John Doe, Inc. v. Mukasey, 549 F.3d 861 (2008) (Attached)

· Compose a case study on the importance of the Appellate Court’s decision to affirm part of the appeal, but remand another section of the lawsuit.

· Was it the correct decision in your opinion?

· Justify your position.

· Describe the importance of NSLs and whether they are worth the possible cost of violating the first amendment.

Aryanfard, O. (n.d.). National Security. https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1134/national-security.

Click https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1134/national-security link to open resource.

John Doe, Inc. v. Mukasey, 549 F.3d 861 (2d Cir. 2008 ). American Association Of University Professors (AAUP). (n.d.). https://www.aaup.org/brief/john-doe-inc-v-mukasey-549-f3d-861-2d-cir-2008.

Click https://www.aaup.org/brief/john-doe-inc-v-mukasey-549-f3d-861-2d-cir-2008 link to open resource.

APA Format, 500 words

See Rubric Below

Wk 3 & 6 Case Study Rubric

Criteria	20 points	26 points
Substance of Brief	2 components were addressed properly	All 3 components of the brief were addressed properly
Criteria	16 points	24 points
Opinion Component	Opinion points were apparent with some supporting details provided that demonstrated some critical thinking. Includes factual inferences that are not supported. Lacks a sophisticated tone, but is readable and understandable.	Opinion points were well developed with substantial, relevant supporting details that demonstrated critical thinking. Includes facts that are important to the analysis and conclusion. The opinion is concise, and the reader has all necessary information.
Criteria	12 points	14 Points
APA Style: In-Text Citations and References	APA style was used with some errors. Some in-text citations conform to APA style AND/OR some references are cited correctly AND/OR there is some accuracy between in-text citations and the references.	APA style was mostly used accurately and consistently. Most or all in-text citations conform to APA style. Most or all references are cited correctly. There is accuracy between in-text citations and the references.
Criteria	12 points	18 points
Overall Mechanics / Professionalism	Case study contained some APA, grammatical, spelling, capitalization, and/or punctuation errors, distracting from professionalism. (3 to 5 errors)	Case study was written in a professional manner using APA guidelines and were mostly free of grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors. (Less than 3 errors)
Criteria	6 points	8 points	12 points	14 points	18 points
Length	Case Study was between 300-349 words	Case Study was between 350-399 words	Case Study was between 400- 449 words	Case Study was between 450- 499 words	Case Study was 500 words

HSE350CASESTUDYWEEK6.docx

Week 6: Case Study Comparative Essay

· https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-governance

A rubric for the project is attached for your review before composing your essay.

Wk 6 Comparative Essay Rubric

CATEGORY	Meets the Standard	Exceeds the Standard
	20 points	40 points
Purpose & Supporting Details	The paper compares and contrasts points clearly, but the supporting information is general, and/or the points are basic. The paper includes only the information relevant to the comparison.	The paper clearly compares and contrasts points that are sophisticated, offers specific examples to illustrate the comparison, and includes only the information relevant to the comparison.
	15 points	30 points
Organization & Structure	The paper breaks the information into point-by-point structure but may not follow a consistent order when discussing the comparison.	The paper breaks the information into point-by-point structure. It follows a consistent order when discussing the comparison.
	5 points	10 points
Transitions	The paper moves from one idea to the next but may lack or misuse transition words to show relationships between ideas.	The paper moves smoothly from one idea to the next and uses transition words and subtle transitions to show relationships between ideas.
	10 points	20 points
Grammar & Spelling (Conventions)	Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.	Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.

HSE400CaseStudyWeek6.docx

HSE 400

Week 6 Case Study

· Case: John Doe, Inc. v. Mukasey, 549 F.3d 861 (2008) (Attached)

· Compose a case study on the importance of the Appellate Court’s decision to affirm part of the appeal, but remand another section of the lawsuit.

· Was it the correct decision in your opinion?

· Justify your position.

· Describe the importance of NSLs and whether they are worth the possible cost of violating the first amendment.

Aryanfard, O. (n.d.). National Security. https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1134/national-security.

Click https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1134/national-security link to open resource.

John Doe, Inc. v. Mukasey, 549 F.3d 861 (2d Cir. 2008 ). American Association Of University Professors (AAUP). (n.d.). https://www.aaup.org/brief/john-doe-inc-v-mukasey-549-f3d-861-2d-cir-2008.

Click https://www.aaup.org/brief/john-doe-inc-v-mukasey-549-f3d-861-2d-cir-2008 link to open resource.

APA Format, 500 words

See Rubric Below

Wk 3 & 6 Case Study Rubric

Criteria	20 points	26 points
Substance of Brief	2 components were addressed properly	All 3 components of the brief were addressed properly
Criteria	16 points	24 points
Opinion Component	Opinion points were apparent with some supporting details provided that demonstrated some critical thinking. Includes factual inferences that are not supported. Lacks a sophisticated tone, but is readable and understandable.	Opinion points were well developed with substantial, relevant supporting details that demonstrated critical thinking. Includes facts that are important to the analysis and conclusion. The opinion is concise, and the reader has all necessary information.
Criteria	12 points	14 Points
APA Style: In-Text Citations and References	APA style was used with some errors. Some in-text citations conform to APA style AND/OR some references are cited correctly AND/OR there is some accuracy between in-text citations and the references.	APA style was mostly used accurately and consistently. Most or all in-text citations conform to APA style. Most or all references are cited correctly. There is accuracy between in-text citations and the references.
Criteria	12 points	18 points
Overall Mechanics / Professionalism	Case study contained some APA, grammatical, spelling, capitalization, and/or punctuation errors, distracting from professionalism. (3 to 5 errors)	Case study was written in a professional manner using APA guidelines and were mostly free of grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors. (Less than 3 errors)
Criteria	6 points	8 points	12 points	14 points	18 points
Length	Case Study was between 300-349 words	Case Study was between 350-399 words	Case Study was between 400- 449 words	Case Study was between 450- 499 words	Case Study was 500 words

other Questions(10)