Module 8: public health implementation, collaboration, & education

Module8.2RUBRIC-Assignment.docx

10/25/26, 9:33 PM Preview Rubric: DNP875 Signature Assignment Rubric v1 - DNP875 Sect1 Population Health and Person-Centered Care - Aspen University Classroom

Criteria

Does Not Meet

Expectations

Approaches

Expectations

Meets Expectations

Exceeds Expectations

Criterion Score

Criteria

Does Not Meet

Expectations

Approaches

Expectations

Meets Expectations

Exceeds Expectations

Criterion Score

DNP875 Signature Assignment Rubric v1

Course: DNP875 Sect1 Population Health and Person-Centered Care

Criteria

Does Not Meet

Expectations

Approaches

Expectations

Meets Expectations

Exceeds Expectations

Criterion Score

Transformation

Project Weight:

%

25

/ 4

point

1

(0

- 87 pts.

)

Identification of sys

-

tem-wide project or

workflow improve

-

ment is vague or

nonexistent; The

process, healthcare

facility, population,

and staff details are

vague or

nonexistent.

2

points

(88 -

99 pts.

)

Identification of sys

-

tem-wide project or

workflow improve

-

ment is present but

missing key details.

The process, health

-

care facility, popula

-

tion, and staff de

-

tails are present but

missing key details.

3

points

)

(100 -

112 pts.

Identification of sys

-

tem-wide project or

workflow improve

-

ment is present and

appropriate. The

process, healthcare

facility, population,

and staff details are

appropriate and

complete.

4

points

(113 -

125 pts.

)

Identification of sys

-

tem-wide project or

workflow improve

-

ment is clear and

concise. The

process, healthcare

facility, population,

and staff are fully

explained and ex

-

pertly presented.

Framework

Weight: 25%

1 point

(0 - 87 pts.)

Descriptions of the variables embedded, the prospective implementation challenges, limitations, and/or barriers, and the variables or concepts proposed or considered not identified or vague.

2 points

(88 - 99 pts.) Selection and descriptions of the variables embedded, the prospective implementation challenges, limitations, and/or barriers, and the variables or concepts proposed or considered are present but missing key details.

3 points

(100 - 112 pts.) Selection and descriptions of the variables embedded, the prospective implementation challenges, limitations, and/or barriers, and the variables or concepts proposed or considered elections and improvements process identification and implementations are appropriate and complete.

4 points

(113 - 125 pts.) Selection and descriptions of the variables embedded, the prospective implementation challenges, limitations, and/or barriers, and the variables or concepts proposed or considered are clearly detailed, fully explained and skillfully demonstrated.

/ 4

Formative &

Summative

Evaluation

Weight: 30%

1 point

(0 - 104 pts.)

Description of a formative and summative evaluation process of the system-wide transformation project is extensive, detailed, and insightful. The dissemination of findings and outcomes at a board or advisory meeting not demonstrated clearly or missing.

2 points

(105 - 119 pts.) Description of a formative and summative evaluation process of the system-wide transformation project is extensive, detailed, and insightful. The dissemination of findings and outcomes at a board or advisory meeting are included but some details are missing.

3 points

(120 - 134 pts.) Description of a formative and summative evaluation process of the system-wide transformation project is extensive, detailed, and insightful. The dissemination of findings and outcomes at a board or advisory meeting are present, appropriate, and complete.

4 points

(135 - 150 pts.) Description of a formative and summative evaluation process of the system-wide transformation project is extensive, detailed, and insightful. The dissemination of findings and outcomes at a board or advisory meeting is illuminating and skillfully detailed

/ 4

Quality of

Written

Communication

Weight: 15%

1 point

(0 - 34 pts)

Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

2 points

(35 - 39 pts)

Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd.

Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

3 points

(40 - 44 pts) Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word

choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

4 points

(45 - 50 pts) Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

/ 4

Total

/ 20

APA Format

Weight: 10%

/ 4

1

point

(0

- 34 pts

)

APA format and

style are not

evident.

2

points

39 pts

)

(35 -

Missing APA ele

-

ments; in-text cita

-

tions, where neces

-

sary, are used but

formatted inaccu

-

rately and not

referenced.

points

3

(40 -

44 pts

)

All key elements of

an APA title page

are present; In-text

citations and a ref

-

erence page are

present with few

format errors.

Mechanics of writ

-

ing are reflective of

APA style.

points

4

(45 -

50 pts

)

A broad understand

-

ing of APA format

and style is evident.

Accurate citations

and references are

presented. No APA

errors are evident.

Overall Score

Level 1

0

points minimum

Level 2

350

points minimum

Level 3

400

points minimum

Level 4

500

points minimum

1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/121488/viewContent/6459341/View 1/5

1/5

Module8Assignment8.2.docx

Assignment Description:

Signature Assignment Title: The Impact of Change Frameworks in Supporting Complex Change Initiatives

Write a 2500 word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least six (6) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

As addressed in the weekly readings, promoting a culture of success, fostering leadership and professional capacity, and building a process of continuous improvement are empirical for the growth of healthcare facilities. By supporting and empowering the workforce and developing policies that promote a culture of health and wellness, population health outcomes may be enhanced. The purpose of this Signature Assignment is to describe and analyze the variables embedded in change frameworks to support complex adaptive change initiatives and drive population health improvement outcomes.

1. Identify a system-wide transformation project or workflow improvement process at a healthcare facility. For example, you may identify the implementation of the patient-centered medical home model, the implementation of an electronic medical record system, implementation of an end-of-life and healthcare proxy process, to name a few.

1. Describe the system-wide transformation project or workflow improvement process.

2. Describe the healthcare facility (i.e., rural outpatient clinic, critical care access hospital, federally qualified health center, etc.)

3. Describe the population that may be positively impacted by the implementation of the project or process.

4. Describe the staff that would be involved and impacted by the implementation of the project or process.

2. Select one of the following frameworks to implement your system-wide transformation project or workflow improvement process initiative: a) Switch, b) Lewin’s Change Management Model, c) Kotter Eight-Step Change Model, or d) McKinsey 7-S Model. If you decide to choose another model, please consult with your instructor.

1. Describe the variables embedded in the framework

2. Depict prospective implementation challenges, limitations, and/or barriers

3. Describe a variable or concept that you would propose and should be considered in this framework

3. Describe a formative and summative evaluation process of the system-wide transformation project or workflow improvement process initiative

1. Describe formative evaluation processes

2. Describe summative evaluation processes

3. Describe the dissemination of findings and outcomes at a Board meeting and/or Advisory Board meeting

Instructions & Specifications

Start by reading and following these instructions:

1. Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

2. Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

The following specifications are required for this assignment:

· Length: 2500 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.

· Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment.

· References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least six (6) scholarly sources to support your claims.

Use scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLES ONLY. Scholarly articles from 2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric. Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.

Learning Materials

Nash, D. B., Skoufalos, A., Fabius, R. J., & Oglesby, W. H. (2021). Population health: Creating A culture of wellness (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett. ISBN: 9781284166606. Read chapters 11, 12 & 14.

DNP875 Comprehension Check

University of Kansas. (n.d.) Community toolbox. https://ctb.ku.edu/en

Kotter. (2022). The 8 steps for leading change.

https://www.kotterinc.com/methodology/8-steps/

McKinsey & Company. (2022). Enduring Ideas: The 7-S Framework.

https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/enduring-ideas-the-7-s-framework#

National Committee for Quality Assurance. (2022). Patient-centered

Medical Home. https://www.ncqa.org/programs/health-care-providers-practices/patient-centered-medical-home-pcmh/

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2022). Healthy People

2030. www.health.gov/healthypeople