Module 5: Public Health Outreach, Screening, & Surveillance
Module 5: Public Health Outreach, Screening, & Surveillance
NYC-Hypertension
setting -Church
17 days ago
10
Module5Assignment_DNP875.docx
Module5Assignment-RUBRIC.docx
Module5Assignment_DNP875.docx
Assignment Description: USE Hypertension Screening Campaign in New York City
Screening Campaign Video ( I need the script)
For this assignment, you will create a 6–7-minute video of you describing the development and implementation of a United States Preventive Task Force A and B Recommendations screening campaign on a topic of interest. Please follow the prompts below on how to: 1) develop the content for the assignment, and 2) create a 6–7-minute video.
Please review the guidelines below on how to create the content for your 6–7-minute video:
1. Go to the United States Preventive Task Force website and select an A or B Recommendation guideline (i.e., colorectal cancer screening, Hypertension, etc.).
· Describe one screening topic.
· Develop at least two clear and measurable outcome goals.
· Identify at least two component of topic-related community statistics (i.e. prevalence, incidence, morbidity).
· Describe current rates of screening or factors that would impact the need for the screening.
2. Develop a plan/proposal on how you would implement the screening educational campaign or initiative in the community (i.e. workplace, health fair, civic center, library, school, etc.).
· Identify targeted population characteristics, including age, gender, risk factors, etc. that aligns with the screening guideline.
· Include the following components: number of persons in the community possibly affected based on age, gender, and race/ethnicity of the county/state.
· Include current rates of screening or factors that would impact the need for screening.
· Describe the county/neighborhood of the population.
· Depict the community setting and include reasoning and explanation for appropriateness of setting selection.
3. Identify one theory or conceptual model that would guide the implementation and evaluation of the screening educational campaign or initiative.
· Briefly discuss how the theory or conceptual model would be applied throughout the screening educational campaign or initiative.
4. Describe the screening activity by incorporating the following components:
· Education component description
· Measures being assessed
· Evidence included to support the guideline recommendations
· Demonstrate possible positive measures and normal and abnormal ranges
· Follow-up and referral process
· Discuss how the screening educational campaign will be evaluated
Instructions & Specifications Submission Rubric
Start by reading and following these instructions:
1. Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.
The following specifications are required for this assignment:
· Length: 6–7-minute video; answers must thoroughly address the questions and prompts for the assignment in a clear and concise manner.
· Structure: Video
· References: N/A
Learning Materials
Nash, D. B., Skoufalos, A., Fabius, R. J., & Oglesby, W. H. (2021). Population health: Creating A culture of wellness (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett. ISBN: 9781284166606. Read chapters 3, 8 & 9. (50 pages)
University of Kansas. (n.d.) Community toolbox. https://ctb.ku.edu/en
Additional Resources:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2022). Healthy People
2030. www.health.gov/healthypeople
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2022). A & B recommendations.
https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/hypertension-in-adults-screening
UNICEF (n.d.). Cholera Toolkit. https://agora.unicef.org/course/info.php?id=4
Module5Assignment-RUBRIC.docx
10/4/26, 6:32 AM Preview Rubric: Graduate Video-Oral Communication Response Assignment Rubric v1 - DNP875 Sect1 Population Health and Person-Centered Care - Aspen University Classroom
10/4/26, 6:32 AM Preview Rubric: Graduate Video-Oral Communication Response Assignment Rubric v1 - DNP875 Sect1 Population Health and Person-Centered Care - Aspen University Classroom
Graduate Video-Oral Communication Response Assignment Rubric v1
Criteria
Does Not Meet 0%
Approaches 70%
Meets 80%
Exceeds 100%
Criterion Score
Content of
Information in
Video Weight:
30
%
/ 30
0
points
Topic is inappropriate to
assignment, inaccurate
understanding of con
-
cepts, unclear and diffi
-
cult to understand
21
points
Topic is mostly cov
-
ered and appropri
-
ate to assignment,
but does not ade
-
quately demon
-
strate accurate un
-
derstanding of con
-
cepts; mostly clear
and understandable
24
points
Topic is completely
covered and appro
-
priate to assign
-
ment; overview of
key concept dimen
-
sions is evident;
clear and
understandable
30
points
In-depth coverage
of topic; outstand
-
ing clarity and ex
-
planation of con
-
cepts demon
-
strated in informa
-
tion presented
Criteria
Does Not Meet 0%
Approaches 70%
Meets 80%
Exceeds 100%
Criterion Score
Oral
Communicatio
n Weight: 30%
/ 30
Organization
Weight: 20%
/ 20
0
points
Central message cannot
be deduced, nor is it ex
-
plicitly stated in presen
-
tation; delivery tech
-
niques (posture, ges
-
tures, eye contact, vo
-
cals) detract from un
-
derstandability of pre
-
sentation and speaker
appears nervous and
uncomfortable; lan
-
guage choices are un
-
clear, minimally support
effectiveness of presen
-
tation, or are inappro
-
priate for audience.
points
21
Central message is
basically under
-
standable, but infor
-
mation is repeated
and somewhat dis
-
organized; delivery
techniques make
speaker appear ten
-
tative and unsure;
language choice is
mundane and com
-
monplace, though
somewhat appropri
-
ate for audience.
points
24
Central message is
clear and consistent
with content; deliv
-
ery techniques
make speaker ap
-
pear comfortable;
language choices
are thoughtful and
appropriate for
audience.
30
points
Central message is
compelling and well
supported; delivery
techniques make
speaker appear
confident and pol
-
ished; language
choices are imagi
-
native, memorable,
and compelling to
support the effec
-
tiveness of the pre
-
sentation.
points
0
Organization pattern
specific
(
introduction/conclusion,
sequenced material
within the body, and
transitions) is not ob
-
servable within the
presentation.
14
points
Organization pat
-
tern is intermit
-
tently observable
within the
presentation.
points
16
Organization pat
-
tern is clear and ob
-
servable within the
presentation.
points
20
Organization pat
-
tern is skillful and
permits a cohesive
-
ness in the
presentation.
Total
/ 100
Criteria
Does Not Meet 0%
Approaches 70%
Meets 80%
Exceeds 100%
Criterion Score
Supporting
Materials
Weight: 20%
/ 20
points
0
Insufficient supporting
materials (explanations,
examples, illustrations,
etc.) do not make refer
-
ence to
information/topic; ma
-
terials do not establish
speaker’s
credibility/authority on
the topic.
points
14
Sufficient support
-
ing materials make
reference to
information/topic,
but do not com
-
pletely establish
speaker’s
credibility/authority
on the topic.
points
16
Supporting materi
-
als make explicit
reference to
information/topic
and generally sup
-
ports it; materials
establish speaker’s
credibility/authority.
points
20
A wide variety of
supporting materi
-
als appropriately
reference informa
-
tion and analysis is
evident.
Overall Score
Level 1
0
points minimum
Level 2
70
points minimum
Level 3
80
points minimum
Level 4
100
points minimum
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/121488/viewContent/6459327/View 1/3
https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/121488/viewContent/6459327/View 1/3
1/3
- 300 - 400 words
- Client Outcome Measures
- Write a C++ function to compute the balance factor of a tree and more.......
- FIN - Otobai Company in Osaka, Japan
- HSA 515 Week 5 Discussion- "Professional Legal Issues with Medical and Nursing Professionals
- I NEED THIS ASAP!! TODAY IF POSSIBLE
- LE Management
- WK 6 Assignment BUSS 599, no plygiarism, need citation and reference
- work
- Employment-At-Will Doctrine