major project
e-post
5 months ago
25
project2.docx
eposter_infection_Ultra.pdf
- projects4.docx
project2.docx
Project 2 health assessment
Group Health Promotion Presentation
In today's healthcare environment, collaboration is essential to ensure patient safety and improve outcomes. When healthcare professionals work together, they create a supportive space where diverse perspectives, values, and strengths can be harnessed to achieve shared goals. This assignment invites you to experience that collaboration firsthand—by working with your classmates to promote health literacy and risk reduction for a specific population.
"Health promotion is the process of enabling people to increase control over and to improve their health." Health Promotion Glossary, 1998.
Health literacy is not the same as literacy—the ability to read and comprehend information. Health literacy refers to a patient's ability to understand, interpret, and make informed decisions about their health based on medical information.
Overview
You'll design a narrated PowerPoint (PPT) presentation that clearly and effectively communicates health information in jargon-free language accessible to the general public (approximately a 6th-grade reading level). This approach ensures patient and family accessibility, empowering them to understand, evaluate, and act on health information. This assignment is worth 25% of your final grade.
To support your work, you'll also explore how AI tools like Copilot can assist with research, drafting, and design. Copilot is a helpful starting point, but it should be used alongside academic and healthcare sources to ensure accuracy and depth.
For additional reference, please review the Patient Education PowerPoint Download Patient Education PowerPoint.
Purpose
This assignment is designed to:
· Strengthening BSN nursing students' communication skills using clear, jargon-free language for public understanding.
· Promote the public's understanding, evaluation, and effective use of health information.
· Raise awareness of healthcare literacy to improve patient outcomes and to promote accessible health resources for providers and patients.
Group Project Overview
You will work in a group to create a PowerPoint Presentation (PPT):
· Review the " Roles in Group ProjectsLinks to an external site." to determine which student will be the leader, researcher, writer, presenter, and/or timekeeper.
· The PowerPoint will focus on health literacy, health promotion, and risk reduction for a specific population (e.g., children, adolescents, or older adults).
· It will be narrated and converted to video format (.mp4).
Selecting a Topic
· Choose a topic relevant to the course and interesting to your team.
· Use your course textbook and the CDC National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP)Links to an external site.
Project Components
· PowerPoint Presentation Video
· Group Reflection Paper
PowerPoint Presentation should:
· No more than 15-20 minutes (18-22 slides)
· Be written in clear, jargon-free language that is accessible to the general public (approximately a 6th-grade reading level)
· Cite your references with the APA style guideLinks to an external site.
· Demonstrate understanding of a specific health promotion strategy
· Address a relevant health concern for your chosen population
· Use creative, engaging visuals to enhance understanding and interest
· Examples of Free Health Promotion ImagesLinks to an external site.
· Present evidence-based content from a patient-centered perspective
· Example of health presentation templatesLinks to an external site.
eposter_infection_Ultra.pdf
S..:.:..,., . ..,., -C !--
,..:::> . ..)
~- .>
~.::::--:: -
ti,,-:-
~- Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Prevention of infections in surgical sites
Sarah C ano, RN, D
aisy G onzalez, RN, M
aricela G onzalez, RN, M
arinelda M orales, RN,
Elizabeth Paredes, RN, D uncan Sosa, RN
... , ....... ......
B enjam
in Leon School of N ursing, M
iam i D
ade C ollege
Introduction/Clinical Problem
I site infections (SSls) can cause long-term effects and
; on patients together w ith financial ~onstraints to the
:are institution (Scow fort,T.,2011). As nurses w
e deal w ith
I patients very frequently, w e care for their surgical w
ounds 1rm PICCs
PICO Q uestion
sing a surgical w ound w
ith chlorhexidine in alcohol m ore
e than using Povidone-iodine in decreasing the risk for >m
ent of surgical site infections ?
patients) w ith any surgical site
(m ajor/m
inor/invasive procedures)
• U sing chlorhexidine in alcohol to cleanse
surgical w ounds VS using Povidone-iodine
prevention of infections in surgical sites Purpose/Aim
pare the effectiveness of using C
hlorhexidine plus alcohol 'ovidone-iodine to prevent surgical site infections(SSls) and ted com
plications. Review
of Literature ,fort, T. (2011), criticizes previous researches on use of Povl -A w
hat m akes difference is is that it is alcohol based.
1lini,S. et.al.(2013), an observational study -resulted in •xidine in alcohol to be m
ore advantageous. :ar, M
. (2015), this study show ed no significant increase in
,n of CIED w hile using Povidone-1 as com
pared to CHG -A.
, S.et.al. (2010), this study found CHG -A better & advisable
eating the positive aerobes due to its persistent action. rni, A et. al. (2013), this study resulted in the CG
H-A group ination rate was m
uch low er than the Povi group.
-iuyide, H. (2015), A prospective study, results did not show
rity betw een either skin prep solution.
, I. et. al (2011), retrospective study found SSI rate was 3.2 N
ith povidone than CHG -A
The prim ary endpoint of the proposed study w
ill be the incidence of at least a superficial infection. IRB approval protocol; will be subm
itted.
M ethods and Data Collection
The study w ill include a random
ized study w ith
Surgical patients (Picc lines)in a Florida facility. The study w
ill include 300 patients> 18 years w
ith surgical (picc) sites and no infections. Patients w
ill be divided into: Control group cleansing surgical site w
ith Povidone-iodine.
· Experim ental group cleansing surgical site w
ith C
hlorhexidine-alcohol (independent variable). R
andom ization w
ill be done in blocks of 5 to evenly balance the num
ber of patients in the tw
o groups. The study w
ill be conducted from the
preoperative preparation of patient to over a period of 60 days post surgical procedure.
Data Analysis The prim
ary outcom e of the incidence of at least
a superficial infection w ill be com
pared betw een
the tw o groups.
D ata results w
ill be obtained from a surgical site
care flow sheet on each participant's record.
Experim ental group's incidence of surgical site
infection w ill be com
pared to the control group' s incidence.
It w ill then be determ
ined if using C hlorhexidine
plus alcohol to cleanse surgical w ounds w
ill result in a statistically significant (t test) m
ethod of surgical site infection prevention or if using Povidone-iodine is sufficient to prevent the occurrence of SSls.
Conclusion SSls are costly and preventable. Prevention of SSts is of m
ajor im portance. Evidence supporting the
use of C hlorhexidine in alcohol to cleanse surgical
sites was found to be m ore effective than
Povidone-iodine in the prevention of surgical site infections per review
of literature. Anticipated advantages of utilizing C
hlorhexidine plus alcohol
M ajor reduction in
_ _
_ su_rgical SiteJ11Je~ti<>_ns
. lm
pr~vem ':nt in.kin
. R e.duced
• integrity 'I
. ,
d't· .
com plications of SSls
P.at1ent s con 1 10n ··· A
''"""- . _s1{!r?l De,cr'?ase in,,_co~~ ?'f ./--~
of nd ca e ·
. - ...
... ..
Kulkam i,. A. & Awode, R. (2013). A prospective random
ised trial to com pare the
efficacy of povidone-iocllne 10% and chlorhe.idine 2%
for skin disinfection. Indian Journal O
f Anaesthesia, 57(3). Retrieved from http://E·m
ail:kaivalyaak@ yahoe.co.in
Levin., L, Am er-Alshlek, J., Avnl, A., &
lessing,, J. (2011). Chlorhexldlne and Alcohol Versus Povidone·lodine for Antisepsis In G
ynecological Surgery. J_DURNAI O F
W OM
<N'S HEALTH, 20(3). http://dx.dol.org/10.1089=Jwh.2010.2391
M agalini, S., Pepe, G., Panunci, S., D
e' G aetano, A., Abatini, C., & Di G
iorgio, A . et al
(2013). European R eview
for M edical and Pharm
acological Sciences. O bservational
Study On Preoperative Surgical Field Disinfection: Povidone-JodineAnd Chlorhexidine-Alcohol, (17), 3367-3375.
O bam
uyide, H., O m
ololu, A., O luwatosin, 0., & lfesanya, A. (2015). East Cent.Afr. J.
Surg. Com parison Betw
een Chlorhexidlne-Alcohol And Povidone Iodine Skin Preparation Solutions In O
rthopedic And Traum a Surgery At An African Tertiary
Hospital, 20.
Q ulntar, M
., Ham m
adoh, M ., W
ilkoff, B., & Tarakjl, K. (2015). The Im pact O
f Changing Antiseptic Skin Preparation Agent Used For Cardiac Im
plantable Electraair; Device {CIED) Procedures On The Risk O
f Infection, 38.
Scowlort, T. (2011). A C ritical Review O
f The Literature Regarding The Use O f
Pov/done Iodine And Chlorhexidine G /uconate For Preoperative Skin Preparation', 21
(3). http://dK.doi.org/lSSN 1467-1026
Sistla, S., Prabhu, G., & Sadasivan, J. [2010). M
inim izing W
ound Contam in.;,tion in a
'Clean' Surgery: Com parison of Chlorhe,idlne-Ethanol and Povidone-lodine.
Chem otherapy, 56, 261-267. http://d,.dol.org/D
O I: 10.1159/000319901
- IP2
- Algebra question
- Phase 3IP
- You are a volunteer research associate at a local Veteran's Administration hospital. Write a 1,200 word paper discussing the following: At least three methods used to assess pain, including cognitive, behavioral, and self-report methods The psychosocial
- property taxes
- economics writing assignment 2 short questions.
- quick turn around 2
- HSM 210 Week 2 Checkpoint Researching Human Services Agencies
- HSM 210 Week 1 CheckPoint Deinstitutionalization of the Mentally Ill
- Case study analysis questions