M6 prep | Nursing homework help

ModuleSixProjectPreparationGuidelinesandRubric-IHP-670-Q5576ProgDesign.pdf

IHP 670 Module Six Project Preparation Guidelines and Rubric

Overview

The fourth component of the logic model is feedback loops, which you have explored in this module. Feedback loops help achieve continuous communication throughout the program’s life

cycle.

Before your program implementation begins, it’s important to identify the barriers and risks associated with it. Identifying barriers and risks to program implementation will help you minimize

them and enhance the benefits. Also, you must plan a strategy to implement feedback loops in a program’s life cycle to achieve continuous improvement in your program. Feedback loops are

necessary components of the logic model for planning a program.

This assignment will help you complete more of the logic model diagram—feedback loops and external barriers—which you will use in the course project presentation. The final component,

assumptions, will be added in the final project.

Prompt

Write a short report to describe your program’s barriers, risks, and benefits and the feedback loops and communication pathways in your program plan.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

1. Role of Feedback Loops and Communication Pathways: Role of Feedback Loops and Communication Pathways: Describe the feedback loops and communication pathways you intend to use in your program and how they will help

achieve continuous communication. Consider the following questions to guide your response:

How might feedback loops and communication pathways help in recognizing adjustments necessary based upon initial outcome results?

How would you know that a specific activity is not functioning correctly?

2. Life Cycle of Program’s Adjustment Needs: Life Cycle of Program’s Adjustment Needs: Describe the process for identifying your program’s adjustment needs. Consider the following question to guide your response:

What design elements would you consider to identify improvement needs?

3. Continuous Improvement: Continuous Improvement: Describe the benefits of continuous quality improvement activities during program development and implementation. Consider the following question to

guide your response:

How would you use PDSA/PDCA—plan, do, study or check, and act—method to ensure the continuous improvement for your program?

4. Barriers, Risks, and Benefits: Barriers, Risks, and Benefits: Determine the external barriers, risks, and benefits of implementing the program, explaining why these elements are important to consider. Consider

the following questions to guide your response:

What are the two external barriers and two risks you think might potentially impact the program’s success?

What would you do to minimize those risks and eliminate those external barriers?

What would you do to enhance benefits?

Note that all the claims in your deliverable should be evidence based. Your citations should be from your independent search for evidence (not from the scenario, textbook, or module

resources) of credible sources and be current within the last five years. You are required to cite a minimum of two sources overall. Refer to the Shapiro Library Guide: Nursing—Graduate

located in the Start Here section of the course for additional support. If you need writing support, access the Online Writing Center through the Academic Support module of your course.

What to Submit

Your submission should be a 2- to 3-page Word document. Also include a title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited

according to APA style.

Module Six Project Preparation Rubric

CriteriaCriteria Exemplary (100%)Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%)Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%)Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%)Not Evident (0%) ValueValue

Role of Feedback LoopsRole of Feedback Loops

and Communicationand Communication

PathwaysPathways

Exceeds proficiency in an

exceptionally clear and

insightful manner, using

industry-specific language

Describes feedback loops and

communication pathways

intended for use in the program

and how they will help achieve

continuous communication

Shows progress toward

proficiency, but with errors or

omissions

Does not attempt criterion 20

Life Cycle of Program’sLife Cycle of Program’s

Improvement NeedsImprovement Needs

Exceeds proficiency in an

exceptionally clear and

insightful manner, using

industry-specific language

Describes the process for

identifying the program’s

adjustment needs

Shows progress toward

proficiency, but with errors or

omissions

Does not attempt criterion 15

ContinuousContinuous Exceeds proficiency in an Describes the benefits of Shows progress toward Does not attempt criterion 20



9/18/23, 8:46 AM Page 1 of 2

ImprovementImprovement exceptionally clear and

insightful manner, using

industry-specific language

continuous quality

improvement activities during

program development and

implementation

proficiency, but with errors or

omissions

Barriers, Risks, andBarriers, Risks, and

BenefitsBenefits

Exceeds proficiency in an

exceptionally clear and

insightful manner, using

industry-specific language

Determines external barriers,

risks, and benefits of

implementing the program,

explaining why these elements

are important to consider

Shows progress toward

proficiency, but with errors or

omissions

Does not attempt criterion 20

Articulation of ResponseArticulation of Response Exceeds proficiency in an

exceptionally clear and

insightful manner

Clearly conveys meaning with

correct grammar, sentence

structure, and spelling,

demonstrating an

understanding of audience and

purpose

Shows progress toward

proficiency, but with errors in

grammar, sentence structure,

and spelling, negatively

impacting readability

Submission has critical errors in

grammar, sentence structure,

and spelling, preventing

understanding of ideas

10

Professional SourcesProfessional Sources Incorporates more than two

professional, current (within

the last five years) sources, or

use of sources is exceptionally

insightful

Incorporates two professional,

current (within the last five

years) sources that support

claims

Incorporates fewer than two

professional, current (within

the last five years) sources, or

not all sources support claims

Does not incorporate sources 10

APA StyleAPA Style Formats in-text citations and

reference list according to APA

style with no errors

Formats in-text citations and

reference list according to APA

style with fewer than five

errors

Formats in-text citations and

reference list according to APA

style with five or more errors

Does not format in-text

citations and reference list

according to APA style

5

Total:Total: 100%

9/18/23, 8:46 AM Page 2 of 2

4ProgramPrep.doc

IHP 670 Logic Model Outline Template

Precious Teasley

Southern New Hampshire University

IHP-670-Q5576 Prog Design Plan & Eval 23TW5

Suzanne Paone

August 2, 2023

Use this template to help you design the logic model outline for your program plan. Fill in the information identified in each section of the outline’s bracketed text, and then delete the bracketed text before submitting this outline for grading. Note: You will not complete the Feedback Loops, Assumptions, and External Barriers at this time. Those spaces are included so that you can view the entire model structure.

Program Title: Controlling Diabetes Prevalence among Older People

Program Goal: to reduce diabetes prevalence among older people in Queens, New Yok City within 6 months.

Inputs or Resources

Activities or Work Products

Outcomes

· A hospital or health facility will be required

· Clinical staff to implement the program activities and run the program.

· Diabetes self-treatment kits

· Technological medical equipment used with diabetes people

· Reminders

· Social workers

· Medication relevant to the management of their condition

· Provide print and online resources for the participants to read and understand the illness dynamics effectively

· Educating and training to handle the identified illness

· Training on symptoms, management, diet, lifestyle, medication, and well-being exercises to enhance their health.

· provide self-monitor devices, training on the blood pressure device, a logbook, and educational material, and send inspirational texts

Short-term Outcomes

The short-term outcomes of the program will include the adoption of physical exercises, the adoption of the recommended diet, effective use of the self-treatment kit, and adherence to schedules

Intermediate Outcomes

Intermediate outcomes will include patient comprehension of diabetes risk factors, an increase in several diabetic patients who are able to monitor and regulate their sugar levels, and the ability of the patients or participants to interpret diabetes information and data from reliable sources.

Long-term Outcomes

To see patients effectively and without reminders, use self-treatment kits, and regulate their blood sugar based on prevailing conditions. The other long-term goal of the program will be to see participants extract information from published resource and the internet and use it to plan their treatment and diabetes management plan individually with the help of the medical staff.

Feedback Loop One: [Communicating with patients or program particpants using mobile phones]

Feedback Loop Two [: Uisng video conferencing tools to convey message to particpnts ]

Assumptions

External Barriers

[It is assumed in the that the program will be composed of particpants suffering from diabetes type-2-diabetes. Secondly, all particpants will be recruited into program on voluntary basiss. Finally, the program will be implemented by professional healthcare p[arctitioners.]

[The main challenge that may arise from the program will be convincing the targeted population members to accept to be involved in the program (Sesti et al., 2018). Many people who fall under the identified population may not be willing to participate in the program because of different social or cultural factors. Funding may also be another issue. Such a program will require a steady flow of program resources and enablers to achieve the set goals in the short and long run.]

M4ProgramPrep.docx

4

IHP 670 Module Four Project Preparation

Precious Teasley

Southern New Hampshire University

IHP-670-Q5576 Prog Design Plan & Eval 23TW5

Suzanne Paone

August 2, 2023

IHP 670 Module Four Project Preparation

Program Title and Program Goal

Diabetes prevalence among older adults in America has become a costly health problem. Therefore, controlling diabetes prevalence in older people is crucial for their health and well-being and cutting healthcare costs. The title of the proposed program is "Controlling Diabetes Prevalence among Older People," and the program's primary goal is to reduce diabetes prevalence among older people. It is estimated that around 33% of people aged 65 years and above in America have diabetes (LeRoith et al., 2019). The population is therefore exposed to risks of contracting diabetes-related complications such as low blood pressure, heart disease, and kidney failure, among others. The current program outcomes and achievements will be measured using the SMART goals developed by the program implementers (Holt et al., 2021). As described in business studies, “Specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals have been used to measure the effectiveness of healthcare programs.

Program Input or Resources

For any program to be implemented, some resources or inputs must be provided or considered because they are necessary. For a program dealing with reducing diabetes prevalence, a hospital or health facility will be required, and clinical staff to implement the program activities and run the program. The role of the healthcare practitioners in the program will be to educate the population on best practices that can help them reduce the risks of contracting diabetes (LeRoith et al., 2019). Similarly, they will provide education on how the already people living with diabetes can control and deal with the symptoms. People living with diabetes are likely to lead a healthy life if they are supported and access medication relevant to the management of their condition timely. Again, it will be imperative to have other human resources such as social workers, medication, and medical equipment for measuring different health conditions among the participants, and other material resources, for instance, to provide information to the population. The main challenge that may arise from the program will be convincing the targeted population members to accept to be involved in the program (Sesti et al., 2018). Many people who fall under the identified population may not be willing to participate in the program because of different social or cultural factors. Funding may also be another issue. Such a program will require a steady flow of program resources and enablers to achieve the set goals in the short and long run.

Work Products and Activities in the Program

Any program aimed at controlling specific diseases in the community requires a high level of education and training to handle the identified illness. Therefore, the primary partnership in the program will be developing an educational partnership relationship with the participants. The program implementers and facilitators will provide education to people living with diabetes on symptoms, management, diet, lifestyle, medication, and well-being exercises to enhance their health (Holt et al., 2021). The other activity in the program will be to provide print and online resources for the participants to read and understand the illness dynamics effectively. The program implementers will provide self-monitor devices, training on the blood pressure device, a logbook, and educational material, and send inspirational texts to participants to ensure adherence to program guidelines.

Reminders to remind the patients to take their medication and follow other schedules will be provided, and participants will also be trained on how to use them. The medical staff will use technological data-collecting devices to access daily data collected from the participants in the project (Sesti et al., 2018). Access to data will facilitate the giving of feedback to patients by the medical staff and facilitate other actions and decisions that need to be taken. The other activity included in the program will educate the diabetic population on how to use the self-treatment kit used by diabetic people. This is imperative as it will ensure that medication schedules are maintained even in the absence of the medical staff (Storr et al., 2017). The medical practitioners in the program will assess, analyze and interpret collected data to ensure that effective measures and interventions are implemented throughout the program to ensure the effectiveness and achievement of the program goals. As mentioned, the participants will also be involved in physical activities aimed at enhancing aerobic and anaerobic respiration and helping the patient maintain a healthy lifestyle. The participants will also receive a healthy diet for their health status or condition.

Short, Intermediate, and Long-Term Outcomes of the Program

Program evaluation best practices require evaluating it based on the short-term, intermediate, and long-term outcomes. Therefore, any program must have short, intermediate, and long-term goals to measure the outcomes. The short-term outcomes of the program will include the adoption of physical exercises, the adoption of the recommended diet, effective use of the self-treatment kit, and adherence to schedules (Holt et al., 2021). This outcome will be measured or evaluated after 3-4 weeks after the program has been rolled out. Intermediate outcomes will include patient comprehension of diabetes risk factors, an increase in several diabetic patients who are able to monitor and regulate their sugar levels, and the ability of the patients or participants to interpret diabetes information and data from reliable sources. The long-term outcomes of the program will be to see patients effectively and without reminders, use self-treatment kits, and regulate their blood sugar based on prevailing conditions. The other long-term goal of the program will be to see participants extract information from published resource and the internet and use it to plan their treatment and diabetes management plan individually with the help of the medical staff (Storr et al., 2017). Usually, maintaining a balanced blood sugar among people living with diabetes is vital to healthy living. It helps to reduce critical stages of the illnesses that may prompt hospitalization hence reducing the costs of healthcare.

References

LeRoith, D., Biessels, G. J., Braithwaite, S. S., Casanueva, F. F., Draznin, B., Halter, J. B., & Sinclair, A. J. (2019). Treatment of diabetes in older adults: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 104(5), 1520–1574.

Sesti, G., Incalzi, R. A., Bonora, E., Consoli, A., Giaccari, A., Maggi, S., & Ferrara, N. (2018). Management of diabetes in older adults. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, 28(3), 206-218.

Storr, J., Twyman, A., Zingg, W., Damani, N., Kilpatrick, C., Reilly, J., & Allegranzi, B. (2017). Core components for effective infection prevention and control programs: new WHO evidence-based recommendations. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, pp. 6, 1–18.

Holt, R. I., DeVries, J. H., Hess-Fischl, A., Hirsch, I. B., Kirkman, M. S., Klupa, T., & Peters, A. L. (2021). The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes care, 44(11), 2589-2625.