LP737 week 6

Activity D: Assess Yourself! (Due July 5) 7/5/2026

6 Points Possible

In Progress NEXT UP: Submit Assignment

Unlimited Attempts Allowed 6/11/2026

Attempt 1 Add Comment

Details

Adult Development Reflection Activity: Self-Authorship, Subject-Object, and AI-Assisted Inquiry

Purpose of the Activity

This activity invites you to explore Kegan’s adult development theory through three lenses: your own self-assessment, an AI-assisted experimental “Subject-Object Interview,” and a reflective analysis of what you learned through the process.

The goal is not to label yourself, rank yourself, or prove that you are operating at a particular developmental level. This reflection will only be seen by you and your professor. Instead, the purpose is to practice developmental thinking by noticing how you make meaning, what you can take as object, and what may still have a hold on you as subject.

Kegan’s framework asks us to consider not simply what a person thinks, but how they organize experience, identity, relationships, responsibility, conflict, and authority.

 

Learning Objectives

By completing this activity, students will be able to:

1. Apply Kegan’s constructive-developmental theory to their own lived experience. 2. Distinguish between behavioral content and developmental structure. 3. Practice using behavioral evidence to support a developmental hypothesis. 4. Experience an AI-assisted, experimental version of a Subject-Object Interview. 5. Critically evaluate the usefulness and limitations of AI in developmental assessment. 6. Reflect on the ethical, personal, and professional implications of developmental interpretation.

 

Important Framing

This activity is developmental, reflective, and exploratory. It is not a clinical assessment, a formal developmental evaluation, or a definitive Subject-Object Interview.

AI cannot accurately determine your adult development level. At best, it can help identify possible patterns in your meaning-making based on the examples you provide. Any “level” suggested by AI should be treated as a tentative hypothesis, not a conclusion.

You are also encouraged to protect your privacy. You do not need to disclose anything deeply personal, traumatic, or identifying. Choose examples that feel meaningful but safe enough to explore in an academic setting.

 

Assignment Instructions

Write a short paper in which you complete the following three parts.

Part I: Your Own Developmental Self-Assessment

Suggest what Kegan adult development level you believe you may currently be operating from most often.

You may discuss one primary level or a transition between levels. For example, you might suggest that you often operate from the Socialized Mind, Self-Authoring Mind, or somewhere between them. You may also identify ways you move differently across contexts, such as work, family, relationships, leadership, or academic life.

Your analysis should include behavioral evidence. Do not simply say, “I think I am self-authoring.” Instead, describe specific patterns in how you respond to challenge, feedback, conflict, expectations, identity, relationships, authority, or decision-making.

Consider questions such as:

How do I respond when others disagree with me? How much do external expectations shape my choices? How do I define success for myself? When do I rely on others’ approval or validation? When do I act from my own internal values or principles? How do I handle competing loyalties or expectations? What kinds of situations make me feel pulled, defensive, responsible, guilty, or uncertain? What can I now reflect on that previously controlled me?

Be sure to connect your reflections to course concepts and readings.

 

Part II: AI-Assisted Experimental Subject-Object Interview

Use AI to guide you through an experimental “Subject-Object Interview” process.

You will ask AI to interview you using questions inspired by the Subject-Object Interview. The AI should ask you one question at a time and probe for how you make meaning of your experiences. After the interview, ask AI to generate a brief developmental hypothesis about what Kegan level your responses may suggest.

(Please refer to the sample AI prompt below, which you can enter directly into AI.)

Your AI-generated report should include:

1. Possible Kegan level or transition point. 2. Behavioral evidence from your responses. 3. What appears to be “subject” for you. 4. What appears to be “object” for you. 5. Alternative interpretations. 6. Limitations of the AI’s interpretation.

You may include the AI report as an appendix, or you may summarize it in the body of your paper.

Remember: the AI report is not the final answer. Your task is to critically engage with it.

Sample AI Prompt for the Experimental Subject-Object Interview

I am completing an assignment for a doctoral-level Adult Development Psychology course focused on Robert Kegan’s adult development theory.

Please guide me through an experimental Subject-Object Interview inspired by Kegan’s theory.

Important instructions:

1. Ask me one question at a time. 2. Do not tell me what developmental level I may be operating from until the interview is complete. 3. Ask follow-up questions that explore how I make meaning of my experiences, not just what happened. 4. Help me explore what I may be “subject to” and what I may be able to take as “object.” 5. Ask questions related to areas such as responsibility, expectations, feedback, conflict, identity, authority, success, failure, relationships,

and decision-making. 6. Keep the tone reflective, respectful, and nonjudgmental.

7. Do not diagnose me or make definitive claims. 8. After 8–10 questions, ask me whether I am ready for a tentative developmental interpretation.

When I say I am ready, please write a brief report that includes:

A tentative Kegan adult development level or transition point Behavioral evidence from my responses What appears to be “subject” for me What appears to be “object” for me Alternative interpretations Limitations of your analysis Two reflective questions for my continued development

Please begin by asking me the first interview question.

 

Part III: Reflection on the Process

Reflect on what you learned from comparing your self-assessment with the AI-assisted interview report.

You may consider the following questions:

Where did your self-assessment and the AI’s interpretation align? Where did they differ? Did the AI notice anything you had not considered? Did the AI overstate, oversimplify, or misread anything? What did this process reveal about how you make meaning? What did you notice about what is still “subject” for you? What did you notice you are increasingly able to take as “object”? How might this awareness affect your leadership, relationships, coaching, consulting, therapy, teaching, or doctoral development? What are the ethical risks of using AI to interpret adult development? How might developmental humility shape how we interpret ourselves and others?

 

Suggested Paper Structure

Your paper should be approximately 4–6 pages, not including appendices.

Please use the following structure:

1. Introduction

Briefly introduce the purpose of the paper and name the Kegan adult development level or transition you are exploring.

2. My Developmental Self-Assessment

Describe the Kegan level you believe you most often operate from. Use behavioral evidence and connect your interpretation to course concepts.

3. AI-Assisted Subject-Object Interview Summary

Briefly describe the interview process. Summarize the AI’s developmental hypothesis, including the level it suggested and the evidence it used.

4. Comparison and Reflection

Compare your self-assessment with the AI report. Discuss what fit, what did not fit, and what you learned about your own meaning- making.

5. Implications for Practice

Discuss how this learning may shape your development as a psychologist, leader, coach, consultant, educator, therapist, researcher, or practitioner.

6. Conclusion

Close with one or two key takeaways about adult development, self-awareness, and the use of AI as a reflective tool.

 

Grading Rubric: Adult Development Reflection Activity — 6 Points

1. Understanding of Kegan’s Adult Development Theory — 2 points

Clearly demonstrates an understanding of Kegan’s adult development levels, especially the idea of subject-object movement and meaning-making.

2 pts: Strong, accurate understanding of Kegan’s theory 1 pt: Some understanding, but may be general or unclear 0 pts: Limited or inaccurate understanding

2. Self-Assessment with Behavioral Evidence — 1 point

Suggests a possible Kegan adult development level and supports it with specific behavioral examples.

2 pts: Clear self-assessment with thoughtful behavioral evidence 1 pt: Self-assessment is present but evidence is vague or limited 0 pts: No clear self-assessment or behavioral support

3. AI-Assisted Subject-Object Interview Summary —1 point

Uses AI to complete an experimental Subject-Object Interview and summarizes the AI’s developmental hypothesis.

2 pts: Clearly summarizes the AI interview and report 1 pt: Mentions the AI process but summary lacks depth 0 pts: AI interview/report is missing or unclear

4. Critical Reflection and Comparison — 1 point

Reflects on what was learned by comparing the student’s self-assessment with the AI-generated report.

3 pts: Thoughtful, honest, and nuanced reflection; clearly compares self-assessment and AI interpretation 2 pts: Solid reflection, but could go deeper 1 pt: Minimal reflection or mostly descriptive 0 pts: Little to no reflection

5. Writing Quality and Professional Presentation — 1 point

Paper is organized, clear, and professionally written.

1 pt: Clear, organized, and polished writing 0 pts: Writing is difficult to follow or lacks organization

Total: 6 points

 

Ethical Reminder

Please do not use this assignment to diagnose yourself or others. Developmental levels are not measures of worth, intelligence, emotional maturity, morality, or professional competence. They are ways of understanding how people construct meaning at a given time, in a given context.

The strongest papers will avoid certainty and instead demonstrate curiosity, evidence, complexity, and developmental humility.

 

Choose a submission type

Media Upload Office 365

Previous

(https://canvas.williamjames.edu/courses/10838/modules/items/466578) Submit Assignment

Next

(https://canvas.williamjames.edu/courses/10838/modules/