Lorem, Ipsum

Course Name and Title

Full Faculty’s Name and Credentials

Month date, year

1

8

Review of the Practice Problem

“In sentence case and quotes” provide the name of the article, cite authors, and a description of the practice setting. Be sure that you are providing appropriate citations throughout the narrative. Clearly identify and state the main problem found in the article (state the clinical practice problem identified within the article is…….). Provide an overview of the information contained within the selected article that supports the existence and significance of the problem. Including information such as participants/setting of the article and data or statistics (%, $, #) adds credibility to the significance of the problem. A problem needs to be a real problem, or it is not worth addressing. Prove there is a real problem with data because data drives decisions. Data can be in the form of numbers (quantitative) or themes (qualitative). Significance is also validated by content from the article that discusses what happens as a result of this problem. This section of your paper is only about the problem from the Unit 4 article you selected, not a diagnosis, or an intervention and will be the same content for the problem section of all remaining papers for this course. DO NOT INCLUDE SUPPORTING LITERATURE OF ANY TYPE IN THIS SECTION. *if faculty suggested edits from Unit 4 for this section, please make those edits; otherwise this section is the same (this is NOT self-plagiarism as this is a building paper within the same course).

Literature Review: Intervention

Prior to writing the literature review, critically appraised each article. This involves examining research design, sample size, intervention implementation, outcome measures, and reported results, as well as noting strengths and limitations. This appraisal allows the writer to determine the quality of the evidence and prepare for discussion of analytical findings. You will select one (1) intervention for the literature review.

The writing of the literature review should focus on synthesizing the evidence across studies rather than summarizing each article separately. The intervention is discussed as a central concept, with attention to how it was implemented in each study and where approaches were similar or different. Findings are then compared to identify consistent outcomes, variations in effectiveness, or conflicting results.

Using comparative language helps demonstrate synthesis and critical thinking. In a literature review, comparisons are commonly made using words and phrases such as similarly, likewise, in comparison, by contrast, in contrast, while, however, although, across the studies, collectively, taken together, and overall to highlight similarities, differences, and patterns among findings rather than describing each study in isolation. In addition, the literature review should address any weaknesses or gaps in the study. This discussion shows an understanding of the strengths and limitations of the existing research.

The literature review should conclude by linking the synthesized findings to clinical practice and explain how the evidence supports this intervention as an effective solution to address the identified clinical problem. Specifically, the narrative should explain why the intervention is the best choice if this same problem were present in YOUR clinical practice setting. This justification should be based on the collective evidence from the three studies and may briefly consider factors such as demonstrated effectiveness, feasibility, consistency of outcomes, and relevance to the student’s clinical environment. The conclusion should make it clear how evidence from literature supports informed decision-making for practice improvement.

Conclusion

References

**Upload a pdf for each referenced journal article along with this paper.

**Make sure any website references have functioning retrieval links.

Course Name and Title

Full Faculty’s Name and Credentials

Month date, year

1

8

Review of the Practice Problem

“In sentence case and quotes” provide the name of the article, cite authors, and a description of the practice setting. Be sure that you are providing appropriate citations throughout the narrative. Clearly identify and state the main problem found in the article (state the clinical practice problem identified within the article is…….). Provide an overview of the information contained within the selected article that supports the existence and significance of the problem. Including information such as participants/setting of the article and data or statistics (%, $, #) adds credibility to the significance of the problem. A problem needs to be a real problem, or it is not worth addressing. Prove there is a real problem with data because data drives decisions. Data can be in the form of numbers (quantitative) or themes (qualitative). Significance is also validated by content from the article that discusses what happens as a result of this problem. This section of your paper is only about the problem from the Unit 4 article you selected, not a diagnosis, or an intervention and will be the same content for the problem section of all remaining papers for this course. DO NOT INCLUDE SUPPORTING LITERATURE OF ANY TYPE IN THIS SECTION. *if faculty suggested edits from Unit 4 for this section, please make those edits; otherwise this section is the same (this is NOT self-plagiarism as this is a building paper within the same course).

Literature Review: Intervention

Prior to writing the literature review, critically appraised each article. This involves examining research design, sample size, intervention implementation, outcome measures, and reported results, as well as noting strengths and limitations. This appraisal allows the writer to determine the quality of the evidence and prepare for discussion of analytical findings. You will select one (1) intervention for the literature review.

The writing of the literature review should focus on synthesizing the evidence across studies rather than summarizing each article separately. The intervention is discussed as a central concept, with attention to how it was implemented in each study and where approaches were similar or different. Findings are then compared to identify consistent outcomes, variations in effectiveness, or conflicting results.

Using comparative language helps demonstrate synthesis and critical thinking. In a literature review, comparisons are commonly made using words and phrases such as similarly, likewise, in comparison, by contrast, in contrast, while, however, although, across the studies, collectively, taken together, and overall to highlight similarities, differences, and patterns among findings rather than describing each study in isolation. In addition, the literature review should address any weaknesses or gaps in the study. This discussion shows an understanding of the strengths and limitations of the existing research.

The literature review should conclude by linking the synthesized findings to clinical practice and explain how the evidence supports this intervention as an effective solution to address the identified clinical problem. Specifically, the narrative should explain why the intervention is the best choice if this same problem were present in YOUR clinical practice setting. This justification should be based on the collective evidence from the three studies and may briefly consider factors such as demonstrated effectiveness, feasibility, consistency of outcomes, and relevance to the student’s clinical environment. The conclusion should make it clear how evidence from literature supports informed decision-making for practice improvement.

Conclusion

References

**Upload a pdf for each referenced journal article along with this paper.

**Make sure any website references have functioning retrieval links.