Literature Homework
3 months ago
200
HSE490Assignment8instructions.docx
HSE490Assignment8SupervisedSeniorProjectRubric.docx
- HSE490Assignment3Chapter1.docx
- HSE490ASSIGNMENT6CHAPTER4.docx
- HSE490ASSIGNMENT4Chapter2.docx
- HSE490ASSIGNMENT6CHAPTER3.docx
- HSE490ASSIGNMENT8SeniorProjectPaperTemplate.docx
HSE490Assignment8instructions.docx
Week Eight Assignment: Final Written Senior Project
Top of Form
|
Hide Assignment Information |
|
|
Turnitin™ |
|
|
|
|
|
Instructions |
|
|
By Saturday, 11:59pm, submit the entire final Supervised Senior Project. Please ensure your final written project follows the format in the provided template |
Bottom of Form
image1.gif
HSE490Assignment8SupervisedSeniorProjectRubric.docx
BS-HSEM PROGRAM
HSE490 SUPERVISED SENIOR PROJECT RUBRIC
|
CRITERIA
|
HIGHLY DEVELOPED (SCORE = 4) |
DEVELOPED (SCORE = 3) |
EMERGING (SCORE = 2) |
INITIAL (SCORE = 1) |
BELOW STANDARD (SCORE = 0) |
OVERALL SCORE |
|
Evaluate the managerial practices that have shaped the homeland security and/or emergency management managerial practices |
Extremely well developed evaluation of managerial practices; extremely strong discussion based on strong scholarly research |
Very well developed evaluation of managerial practices; very strong discussion based on good scholarly research |
Well developed evaluation of managerial practices; good discussion based on good scholarly research |
Satisfactory evaluation of managerial practices; satisfactory discussion based on minimal research |
Lacks development of an evaluation of managerial practices; lacks discussion based on scholarly research |
[ ] 4: HIGHLY DEV.
[ ] 3: DEVELOPED
[ ] 2: EMERGING
[ ] 1: INITIAL
[ ] 0: BELOW STD |
|
Analyze court decisions involving homeland security and emergency management agencies |
Extremely well developed analysis of homeland security and/or emergency management decisions; exceptionally strong analysis of homeland security and/emergency management sanctions
|
Very well developed analysis of court decisions; very strong analysis of homeland security and/or emergency management sanctions |
Well developed analysis of court decisions; good analysis of homeland security and/or emergency management sanctions |
Satisfactory analysis of court decisions; satisfactory analysis of homeland security and/or emergency management sanctions |
Lacks analysis of court decisions; lacks analysis of homeland security and/or emergency management sanctions |
[ ] 4: HIGHLY DEV.
[ ] 3: DEVELOPED
[ ] 2: EMERGING
[ ] 1: INITIAL
[ ] 0: BELOW STD |
|
Analyze issues of homeland security and emergency management |
Extremely well developed analysis of homeland security and emergency management |
Very well developed analysis of issues homeland security and emergency management |
Well developed analysis of issues involving homeland security and emergency management |
Satisfactory analysis of issues involving homeland security and emergency management |
Lacks analysis of issues involving homeland security and emergency management |
[ ] 4: HIGHLY DEV.
[ ] 3: DEVELOPED
[ ] 2: EMERGING
[ ] 1: INITIAL
[ ] 0: BELOW STD |
|
Evaluate and determine ethical issues in homeland security and emergency management |
Extremely well developed evaluations of ethical issues in homeland security and emergency management |
Very well developed evaluations of ethical issues in homeland security and emergency management |
Well-developed evaluation of ethical issues in homeland security and emergency management |
Satisfactory evaluations of ethical issues in homeland security and emergency management |
Lacks evaluation of ethical issues in homeland security and emergency management |
[ ] 4: HIGHLY DEV.
[ ] 3: DEVELOPED
[ ] 2: EMERGING
[ ] 1: INITIAL
[ ] 0: BELOW STD |
|
Evaluate and compare the U.S. and international terrorism perspectives |
Extremely well developed evaluation of U.S. and international terrorism perspectives |
Very well developed evaluation of U.S. and international terrorism perspectives |
Well-developed evaluation of the U.S. and international terrorism perspectives |
Satisfactory development of the evaluation of U.S. and international terrorism perspectives |
Lacks development of evaluation of U.S. and international terrorism perspectives |
[ ] 4: HIGHLY DEV.
[ ] 3: DEVELOPED
[ ] 2: EMERGING
[ ] 1: INITIAL
[ ] 0: BELOW STD |
|
Evaluate disciplinary, theoretical and philosophical foundations in homeland security and emergency management |
Extremely well developed evaluation of the disciplinary, theoretical and philosophical foundations in homeland security and emergency management |
Very well developed evaluation of the disciplinary, theoretical and philosophical foundations in homeland security and emergency management |
Well developed evaluation of the disciplinary, theoretical and philosophical foundations in homeland security and emergency management |
Satisfactory evaluation of the disciplinary, theoretical and philosophical foundations in homeland security and emergency management |
Lacks evaluation of the disciplinary, theoretical and philosophical foundations in homeland security and emergency management |
[ ] 4: HIGHLY DEV.
[ ] 3: DEVELOPED
[ ] 2: EMERGING
[ ] 1: INITIAL
[ ] 0: BELOW STD |
|
Formulate homeland security and emergency management strategies |
Extremely well developed formulation of homeland security and emergency management strategies |
Very well developed formulation of homeland security and emergency management strategies |
Well-developed formulation of homeland security and emergency management strategies |
Satisfactory development of formulation of homeland security and emergency management strategies |
Lacks development of formulation of homeland security and emergency management strategies |
[ ] 4: HIGHLY DEV.
[ ] 3: DEVELOPED
[ ] 2: EMERGING
[ ] 1: INITIAL
[ ] 0: BELOW STD |
|
Utilize critical thinking and problem solving skills to identify quality scholarship and research in the fields of homeland security and emergency management |
Utilized exceptional critical thinking and problem solving skills; identified extremely strong scholarship and research in developing the project |
Utilized very strong critical thinking and problem solving skills; identified very strong scholarship and research in developing the project |
Utilized strong critical thinking and problem solving skills; identified strong scholarship and research in developing the project |
Utilized satisfactory critical thinking and problem solving skills; identified satisfactory scholarship and research in developing the project |
Lacks critical thinking and problem solving skills; lacks satisfactory scholarship and research in developing the project |
[ ] 4: HIGHLY DEV.
[ ] 3: DEVELOPED
[ ] 2: EMERGING
[ ] 1: INITIAL
[ ] 0: BELOW STD |
|
TOTAL SCORE (INSTRUCTIONS) |
ADD ALL SCORES IN RIGHT COLUMN AND DIVIDE BY 5 |
HONORS (H) = 3.0 OR ABOVE |
SATISFACTORY (S) = 2.9 TO 2.3 |
UNSATISFACTORY (U) 2.2 OR BELOW |
|
TOTAL = TOTAL /5= |