|
NURS_8302_Week4_Assignment2_Rubric
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the three rate-based measures of quality you selected, and explain why.
|
|
20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly describes in detail three rate-based measures of quality.... The response provides accurate and specific details that fully support the selection of the three rate-based measures described.
|
17 to >15.0 pts
Good
The response accurately describes three rate-based measures of quality.... The response provides accurate details that support the selection of the three rate-based measures described.
|
15 to >13.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely describes three rate-based measures of quality.... OR... The response describes less than three rate-based measures of quality.... The response provides inaccurate or vague details that may support the selection of the rate-based measures described.
|
13 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes three rate-based measures of quality, or it is missing.... The response provides inaccurate and vague details that do not support the selection of the rate-based measures described, or it is missing.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDeconstruct each rate-based measure to include the definition of each measure, explanation of the numerical description of how the measure is constructed, explanation of how the data is collected, description of how the measure is compared externally, explanation of whether or not the measure is risk adjusted, and a description of the how goals might be set for each measure. Be specific, and provide examples.
|
|
25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail each of the three rate-based measures.... The response accurately and clearly explains all elements of each measure, including: the definition of the measure, explanation of the numerical description, explanation of how the data is collected, description of how the measure is compared, explanation of risk, and description of goals.... The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the three rate-based measures described.
|
22 to >19.0 pts
Good
The response accurately explains each of the three rate-based measures.... The response accurately explains the elements of each measure, including: the definition of the measure, explanation of the numerical description, explanation of how the data is collected, description of how the measure is compared, explanation of risk, and description of goals.... The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the three rate-based measures described.
|
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains each of the three rate-based measures.... The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the elements of each measure.... The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the three rate-based measures described.
|
17 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains each of the three rate-based measures, or it is missing.... The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the elements of each measure, or it is missing.... The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the three rate-based measures described, or it is missing.
|
|
25 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the importance of each measure to a chosen clinical organization and setting. Be specific as to the setting.
|
|
20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the importance of each measure to a chosen clinical organization and setting. ... The response provides accurate and specific details that fully support the selection of the three rate-based measures and the clinical organization or setting described.
|
17 to >15.0 pts
Good
The response accurately explains the importance of each measure to a chosen clinical organization and setting. ... The response provides accurate details that support the selection of the three rate-based measures and the clinical organization or setting described.
|
15 to >13.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the importance of each measure to a chosen clinical organization and setting. ... The response inaccurately or vaguely provides details that may support the selection of the three rate-based measures and the clinical organization or setting described.
|
13 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the importance of each measure to a chosen clinical organization and setting, or it is missing.... The response inaccurately and vaguely provides details that do not support the selection of the three rate-based measures and the clinical organization or setting described, or it is missing.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how each rate-based measure you selected relates to patient safety, to the cost of poor quality, and to the overall cost of healthcare delivery. Be specific, and provide examples.
|
|
20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how each rate-based measure relates to patient safety, cost of poor quality, and overall cost of healthcare delivery.... The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the rate-based measures described.
|
17 to >15.0 pts
Good
The response accurately explains how each measure relates to patient safety, cost of poor quality, and overall cost of healthcare delivery.... The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the rate-based measures described.
|
15 to >13.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how each measure relates to patient safety, cost of poor quality, and overall cost of healthcare delivery.... The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the rate-based measures described.
|
13 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how each measure relates to patient safety, cost of poor quality, and overall cost of healthcare delivery, or it is missing.... The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the rate-based measures described, or it is missing.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
|
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.... A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
|
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
|
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. ... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
|
3 to >0 pts
Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.... No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
|
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
|
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
3 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
|
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
|
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.
|
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
|
3 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100
|
Tinacherry100$
3 years ago
40
files (2)
