L.A.2
Kindly check the document
a year ago
25
L.A.2.pdf
L.A-Instructions.pdf
L.A.2.pdf
Letter Assignment 2 Grad Systematic Theology 1
Fall 2024
Scenario: People in your congregation have read Jonathan R. Wilson’s God’s Good World. It has
proven to be controversial with some people loving it and others hating it. Specifically, some
people are not happy with his methodology. Others see his understanding of creation itself as
being a problem. Still others are unhappy regarding the eschatology presented. As the pastor of
the church you need to articulate the church’s position regarding this controversy.
The target text for this assignment is Jonathan R. Wilson, God’s Good World (Grand Rapids, MI:
Baker, 2013). The letter will focus on three areas: method, creation, and eschatology. For each
area the student must identify and discuss at least one strength and at least one weakness of the
target text.
The wordcount minimum is 3000 words and the maximum is 4000 words.
The assignment is due at 11:59 PM, 16 December 2024.
Let me know if you have any questions or if you run into any issues (“life happens”).
L.A-Instructions.pdf
1
A Quick Guide to Writing
Congregational Letter Assignment
The Basics
Rather than a formal academic paper, a congregational letter is a less formal style of writing that
allows you to demonstrate your knowledge of course material in a (somewhat) real-life situation
you may face in a congregational setting.
Here is the scenario: several members of your church have recently read something (the target
text) which has created some controversy within your congregation. It has become heated enough
that you, as the pastor, must address it publicly and on the record. Fortunately, you have taken
this course which has equipped you with some resources for critically engaging with the target
text.
A congregational letter assignment is less formal than a traditional academic paper in a number
of ways. The style is more pastoral and conversational—use of the first person works in a
congregational letter but is generally frowned upon in purely academic writing. While the letter
will rely on knowledge gained from technical sources, it will attempt to explain it with a
minimum of jargon and a minimum of direct quotations. In other words, the letter is not an
avalanche of quotations, but you’re not just shooting from the hip either. I am expecting some
direct quotation of the target text when discussing a particular point from it, however it should be
what is minimally necessary to accurately represent the target author’s position. I do not want to
see block quotes in this letter unless it is absolutely necessary to make your point or to accurately
represent what the author is saying.
While the letter is less formal than a traditional paper, it is also more academic than an actual
letter (or blog post) you would put before your congregation. You will have footnotes and
citations pointing to the location in our textbooks where you are drawing information from—
even though you will rarely directly quote from them. Keep in mind this is not a research paper.
You should have all you need to write the letter based on reading the target text and then
engaging it from the perspective of the course material. This does not mean you cannot use
something from outside of class, but engagement with the course material is paramount.
Elements
Title: Your congregational letter should have a descriptive title which helps captures your overall
evaluation of the target text.
Introduction: A short paragraph (approximately 200 words) that introduces the controversy,
specifically mentions the author and title of the target text creating the controversy, and
highlights the crucial points of your overall analysis and evaluation of the target text.
Critique: This is where you present your informed evaluation regarding the important issues
raised by the target text. Remember a good critique acknowledges both the strengths and
weaknesses of a text. You want to acknowledge what is and is not good and why (i.e.,
examination). You should also identify how important the particular issues are (i.e.,
categorization). Sometimes the particular assignment will specify areas which must be
addressed; other times the areas are left up to the student to determine. NB: it is often easier to
know why you disagree with something than why you agree but do your best to provide reasons
2
for both agreeing and/or disagreeing. For points you agree with, you may need to use your
imagination a little to see why someone might be bothered and then to answer those concerns.
For citations or quotations of the target text use inline citations, e.g., (p. 25). For citing textbooks
use footnotes following the Turabian style manual. If you do not have a copy of Turabian here is
the official website which is quite helpful:
https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/turabian/turabian-notes-and-bibliography-citation-quick-guide.html Make sure and provide citations (not necessarily quotations) to show where you are using
material from our textbooks. This allows the reader to go to the source if there is a question. If
you are remembering material from the class discussion but it was also in one of our textbooks,
cite the textbook. If it is from class discussion but not in the textbook, you do not need to provide
a formal citation. If it is something from the textbook that was modified in class, for example
creedal/confessional/adiaphora instead of dogma/doctrine/opinion, cite the textbook but include
in the footnote something like “as modified by Wisemore.”
Conclusion: Wrap up your letter with a paragraph (approximately 200–300 words) that
highlights the main points of your analysis and evaluation of the target text.
Bibliography: Everything you cite, not just quote, in your paper should be found in the
bibliography, including the target text. This should be on a separate page at the end of your
letter—see Turabian for further information about preparing and formatting a bibliography.
Length
Different letter assignments will have different minimum and maximum wordcount requirements
for the letter. These wordcount requirements include the title and bibliography. Papers which do
not meet the minimum wordcount will receive a maximum score of 50%. Papers which exceed
the maximum will receive a maximum grade of 75%. For example, a paper may have a length
requirement stated as 2000–2500 words. If the paper has less than 2000 words, then it would
receive a score of 50% or less. If it has more than 2500 words, the best grade it will receive is
75%.
Formatting
The only hard and fast requirements regarding formatting of the letter proper are to facilitate ease
of grading: double-spaced with margins of at least one inch, so I can easily enter comments; 12-
point Times New Roman or similar serif font, so my old eyes can easily read it on the screen.
Otherwise, I ask that you just be consistent with your formatting. Please no decorative
flourishes—pictures of cats, curly borders, etc.
When it comes to footnotes, follow the formal Turabian style for doing footnotes as mentioned
above. Remember there is a difference between the format used in the footnote and the format
used in the bibliography.
Submitting the Paper
Please upload your paper in MS Word format (.doc or .docx) as a single document on Discovery.
Almost all word processing programs have the ability to save a document in MS Word format; if
you are having difficulties, contact IT or the professor. Remember, your uploaded paper will go
through Turnitin to check for issues of plagiarism and generative AI. See course schedule for
deadlines and the syllabus for details of the policy regarding late assignments.
Revised: 3 September 2024
- Career Connection: Customer Satisfaction Strategy
- Imagine that you are the Director of Health Information for a large hospital. As Director, you sit on various institution-wide committees which govern the organization’s policies. In collaboration with interdepartmental committees, you have made recomme
- Civil Rights
- Where are the reactants in a chemical equation?
- FOR BABER MAKAYLA ONLY
- Do a powerpoint with 300-500 words
- For Phyllis Young: Community Prevention Program
- Can anyone do my Wk. 5 Final Paper Ethics and Morals?
- Biology Homework DUE TONIGHT
- 9d