Karl Ove Knausgaard

 In 700-1200 words, make an argument grounded in book 1 of My Struggle by Karl Ove Knausgaard. Topic is the varying reader-responses dependent on and reconstituted by individual (and community-based) hermeneutical frameworks. 

Thesis statement is  

The only time you remember something is if you either hate it or you love it. That is why I think Karl Ove Knausgaard’s book one in his collection ‘My Struggle’ has been such a phenomena in the world of writing, because people either love the book or they hate the book. His book has gained a lot of criticism for its brutal, unfiltered truth but also a lot of praise for the same. He seems to have mastered the art of polarizing people with respect to his book and I want to show that people either love his book or hate it by using examples from book one in ‘My Struggle.’ 

MLA citations and atleast 5 reviews for the book and atleast 4-5 references from the book 1 

Need it by 12pm Friday afternoon