IT Governance Case Study

At the heart of Information Governance is planning to avoid future problems. One of the key ways this is accomplished is through risk assessment leading to strategic planning and policy creation. Each of these steps is crucial to the success of the next step. For example, it would be difficult or impossible to create policies without first assessing organizational risk and strategic planning.

Through the use of established risk assessment techniques, an organization can define its assets and move forward to provide protections using best practices and strategic planning. Once key sponsorship roles and responsibilities have been assigned, policies can be defined and implemented so the organization can safeguard itself, its employees, and its important assets.

Directions

1. Information Governance and Healthcare Case Study

Based on the above case study, write a 2 - 3 page paper to include the below information:

• Assign roles and responsibilities for employees at varying levels in the corporate hierarchy
• Analyze risk assessment and risk mitigation strategies and policy needs based on best practices
• Summarize your findings

Include proper APA citations for any references you use in your research. Ensure you have proper spelling, grammar, and mechanics throughout your writing.

Please name your file Lastname_U4_CaseStudy_Assignment.doc and submit it according to the directions below.

Rubric Detail

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Content

Name: Writing Assignment and Case Study Grading Rubric

Description: This Rubric will be used for all written assignments.

• Grid View
• List View

NoviceCompetentProficientFocusPoints:2 (2.00%)Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the assignment Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.Points:12 (12.00%)Establishes a good comprehension of topic. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of assignment, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.Points:20 (20.00%)Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Student builds upon the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.Content/Subject KnowledgePoints:2 (2.00%)Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.Points:12 (12.00%)Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.Points:20 (20.00%)Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment.. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.Critical Thinking SkillsPoints:2 (2.00%)Student demonstrates beginning understanding of key concepts, but overlooks critical details. Learner is unable to apply information in a problem-solving fashion. Student presents confusing statements and facts in assignment. No evidence or little semblance of critical thinking skills.Points:12 (12.00%)Student exhibits a good command of critical thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements. Assignment demonstrates the student’s above average use of relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides adequate conclusions, with 2 or fewer errors.Points:20 (20.00%)Student demonstrates a higher-level of critical thinking. Learner provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student presents a genuine intellectual development of ideas throughout assignment.Organization of Ideas/format (APA)Points:2 (2.00%)Assignment reveals formatting errors and a lack of organization. . The lack of appropriate references or source materials demonstrates the student’s need for additional help or training in this area. Student needs to review and revise the assignment.Points:12 (12.00%)Student explains the majority of points and concepts in the assignment. Student presents an above average level of preparedness, with a few formatting errors. Assignment contains less than 5 resources.Points:20 (20.00%)Student thoroughly understands and excels in explaining all major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented. Finished assignment demonstrates student’s ability to plan and organize research in a logical sequence. Student uses at least of 5-7 references in assignment.Grammar & MechanicsPoints:2 (2.00%)Topics, concepts, and ideas are not coherently discussed or expressed in assignments. Student’s writing style is weak and needs improvement, along with numerous proofreading errors. Assignment lacks clarity, consistency, and correctness. Student needs to review and revise assignment.Points:12 (12.00%)Student provides an effective display of good writing and grammar. Assignment appears to be well written with no more than 3-5 errors. Student provides a final written product that covers the above-minimal requirements.Points:20 (20.00%)Student demonstrates an excellent command of grammar, as well as presents research in a clear and concise writing style. Student excels in the selection and development of a well-planned research assignment. Assignment is error-free and reflects student’s ability to prepare a high-quality academic assignment.

Name:Writing Assignment and Case Study Grading Rubric

Description:This Rubric will be used for all written assignments.