IRAC

Using virtual observations link below:

 https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sfsuperiorcourt.org%2Fvirtual-courtrooms&data=05%7C01%7Cswang18%40mail.sfsu.edu%7C8e9ff1b3608b46e9618a08dabfa56477%7Cd8fbe335822c41a987747f16709aac9f%7C0%7C0%7C638033014691455417%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ti80Lhe6r%2F7ixHmWkSG%2Bmszg7MX9R3MBFa0HstrY8WA%3D&reserved=0 

Afterwards, write a maximum of 1 page per case paper (total 2 case) identifying the parties to the case, stating the Judge or Commissioner’s name and date, and using the IRAC method state the:

 Issue: What were the facts of the case, why was the plaintiff suing (landlord-tenant, car accident, property damage, etc.);

Rule: What was the rule of law stated by the court.

Analysis: How did the court apply the rule of law to the facts of the case; and

Conclusion: How did the court rule? If the court didn’t issue a ruling (took the matter under submission),

using your sense of fairness, how would you have ruled?