Informed Consent Cases

What do you see as the key distinctions among the Cruzan, Matthies, and Canterbury cases?  Looking at these cases chronologically, and based upon your current knowledge of healthcare, what kinds of similar cases do you think are likely to come to the courts and how do you think the courts will hold?  Why? 

The link to the 3 cases are below. 200-300 words, and 2 references APA

 https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/map/TheMissouriSupremeCourtRuling.html -Cruzan

 https://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/torts/torts-keyed-to-franklin/the-negligence-principle/matthies-v-mastromonaco/ -Matthies

 https://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/torts/torts-keyed-to-epstein/the-negligence-issue/canterbury-v-spence-2/ -Canterbury