Identify one or more of the dominant themes in Oedipus the King and Othello. Construct an argument about how the relationship between two of the play's characters allows for development of the theme(s).

  

Compose a 750 to 1250 word essay in MLA format using this

Identify one or more of the dominant themes in Oedipus the King and Othello. Construct an argument about how the relationship between two of the play's characters allows for development of the theme(s).

Successfully completing this assignment will involve constructing an overall thesis for your essay that addresses one of the prompts above and then using quotations and references to specific scenes from the works you select as evidence to support your argument. Reference the Writer's Workshops in Modules 1, 2, 3, and 6 for helpful advice about constructing literary arguments as well as using MLA format for your essay, quotations, citations, and references.

HUMN 142 M7 Essay 2 Rubric

   

HUMN    142 M7 Essay 2 Rubric

 

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

 

This criterion is linked to a   Learning OutcomeIntroduction

Provides   context; includes thesis and forecast if required.

   

10.0 pts

Clearly provides all necessary     information and sets expectations.

8.0 pts

Minor lack or excess of     information; minor lack of clarity.

6.0 pts

Confusing, vague or lacking.

10.0 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a   Learning OutcomeBody Structure

Paragraphs focus   on one major idea; Transitions clearly show relationships among ideas.

   

10.0 pts

Paragraphs consistently meet     expectations; transitions very clear.

8.0 pts

1-3 lapses in paragraphs; 1-3     problems with transitions.

6.0 pts

So many lapses in paragraphs or     problems with transitions that comprehension is difficult.

10.0 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a   Learning OutcomeConclusion

Decisively ends   paper.

   

10.0 pts

Ends paper with powerful impact;     creates a fully satisfying sense of completion.

8.0 pts

Ending works, but may be weak or     does not create a good sense of completion.

6.0 pts

Weak, confusing or missing     ending.

10.0 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a   Learning OutcomeContent

Paper   effectively responds to the topic; paper is sufficient length to adequately   address the topic; both works are discussed thoroughly.

   

30.0 pts

Paper carefully and thoroughly     responds to the topic, discusses both works intelligently and compares and     contrasts them effectively.

24.0 pts

Paper adequately responds to the     topic; length is adequate to address the topic; there is discussion of two     works of literature.

18.0 pts

Paper does not respond     effectively to the topic; length is insufficient to adequately address the     topic; discussion of one work missing or incomplete.

30.0 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a   Learning OutcomeWriting Style

Variety of   sentence constructions, appropriate brevity, use of parallelism, poetic   effects (such as metaphor, simile, alliteration).  Appropriate; avoids   jargon, slang, and overly emotionally charged words.

   

15.0 pts

Pleasing variety of sentence     constructions; always effective and appropriate brevity, use of parallelism     and/or poetic effects.

12.0 pts

Relatively few minor errors.

9.0 pts

Errors detract significantly     from comprehension or create significant distractions.

15.0 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a   Learning OutcomeGrammar

Fragments,   run-ons, tense, voice, person, disagreement, spelling, punctuation.

   

10.0 pts

Few to no errors (1% or less of     assignment word total).

8.0 pts

Some errors (less than 5% of     word total).

6.0 pts

Errors detract significantly     from comprehension.

10.0 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a   Learning OutcomeSources

Integration and   Citation: Quoting, summarizing, and paraphrasing; in-text citations and   references adhere to required style.

   

15.0 pts

Sources interspersed with     writer’s own analysis or synthesis; quotes are less than 10% of paper; 1-5     minor errors in documentation.

12.0 pts

Sources interspersed with     writer’s own work; quotes are less than 20% of paper; more than 5 minor     errors in documentation.

9.0 pts

Sources strung together with     little of the writer’s own work; quotes are 50% or more of paper; citations     missing or with major errors; plagiarism.

15.0 pts

 

Total Points: 100.0