I need help with home work

LaMark19*

Main

Home >Homework Answsers >Education homework help

APA

Can someone help me with these assignments

2 years ago
20.11.2024
30

Report issue

files (3)

LearningObjectiveinstructionweek1.docx
-LearningObjectivesPracticeweek1.docx
Rubicforlearningobjectiveweek1.docx

LearningObjectiveinstructionweek1.docx

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

State standards and learning objectives are foundational to a successful lesson. For students to grow and learn according to state expectations, teachers must accurately align instruction to the state standards. State standards are the big picture and learning objectives are the puzzle pieces that make up the standard. While some state standards are straightforward and can be taught in a single lesson, others must be broken down into multiple learning objectives to be taught over several lessons.

Complete the “Learning Objectives Practice” template to practice writing learning objectives aligned to Arizona state standards for different grade levels and to plan aligned instruction.

Part 1: Writing Learning Objectives

Write a concise learning objective based on each of the given state standards. Then in 50-100 words, provide a rationale for how each learning objective aligns with the state standard.

Part 2: Aligning Instruction

Research the English Language Arts (ELA) or math standards for the state in Mississippi. Select a single standard for a grade level you plan to teach. Write a concise learning objective aligned to your selected standard, then provide a rationale for alignment.

In 100-150 words, write a lesson summary of how you would teach the lesson. Include the following:

· Brief introductory activity to capture the students’ interest/attention at the beginning of the lesson.

· At least one instructional activity that aligns with the learning objective.

· Closing activity to summarize the content of the lesson.

Note: The selected grade level, ELA or math standard, and learning objective will be used throughout the rest of the assignments in this course.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite Technical Support Articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.P

Please use the required reference :

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Required

As applicable, review the Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts for a grade level of your choice to inform the topic assi

https://learning.ccsso.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/ELA_Standards1.pdf

Common Core State Standards for Mathematics

Required

As applicable, review the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics for a grade level of your choice to inform the topic assignment.

https://learning.ccsso.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Math_Standards1.pdf

Writing Lesson Objectives for Classroom Teachers

Required

Watch “Writing Lesson Objectives for Classroom Teachers,” located on YouTube (2018).

https://youtu.be/IS5wMv_ILXE

Lesson Plans

Required

Explore “Lesson Plans,” located on the ReadWriteThink website.

http://www.readwritethink.org/classroom-resources/lesson-plans/

Optional: An Analysis of Strategies for Teaching Standards-Based Lesson Plan Alignment to Preservice Teachers

Optional

Read “An Analysis of Strategies for Teaching Standards-Based Lesson Plan Alignment to Preservice Teachers,” by Drost and Levi

https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oc

-LearningObjectivesPracticeweek1.docx

A close-up of a logo Description automatically generated with low confidence

Learning Objectives Practice

Part 1: Writing Learning Objectives

State Standard	Learning Objective	Alignment Rationale
Fifth Grade English Language Arts: 5.RL.2: Determine a theme of a story, drama, or poem from details of the text; include how characters in story or drama respond to challenges, how the speaker in a poem reflects upon a topic, and a summary of the text.	Example: Students will describe the theme of a story by creating a tree map.	Example: This objective is aligned to the standard because the standard is measuring a student’s ability to determine the theme of either a story, drama, or poem. Since this standard has three different genres, it will need to be taught in multiple lessons. The focus of this lesson would be determining the theme of a story.
Kindergarten English Language Arts K.RL.1: With prompting and support, ask and answer questions about key details in a text.
First Grade Physical Education S1.E12 Manipulatives, Catching: Catches a soft object from a self-toss before it bounces.
Second Grade Mathematics 2.OA.C.3: Determine whether a group of objects (up to 20) has an odd or even number of members (e.g., by pairing objects or counting them by 2's).
Fourth Grade Science 4.E1U1.8: Collect, analyze, and interpret data to explain weather and climate patterns.
Eighth Grade Mathematics 8.SP.A.1: Construct and interpret scatter plots for bivariate measurement data to investigate and describe patterns such as clustering, outliers, positive or negative association, linear association, and nonlinear association.

Part 2: Aligning Instruction

Grade Level:

Subject Area (ELA or Math):

ELA or Math State Standard:

Learning Objective:

Alignment Rationale:

Lesson Summary:

image1.jpeg

Rubicforlearningobjectiveweek1.docx

Rubric Criteria

collapse all Rubric CriteriaCollapse All

Part 1: Writing Learning Objectives

24 points

Criteria Description

Part 1: Writing Learning Objectives

5. Target

24 points

Concise learning objectives that align with the given standards are well-crafted. Alignment rationales for how each learning objective aligns with the state standard are convincing.

4. Acceptable

20.88 points

Concise learning objectives that align with the given standards are appropriate. Alignment rationales for how each learning objective aligns with the state standard are reasonable.

3. Approaching

17.76 points

Learning objectives lack precision and/or unclearly align with the given standards. Alignment rationales for how each learning objective aligns with the state standard are vague.

2. Insufficient

16.56 points

Learning objectives are ineffective or flawed and/or fail to align with the given standards. Alignment rationales for how each learning objective aligns with the state standard are unconvincing.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Part 2: Aligning Instruction – Learning Objective and Alignment Rationale

6 points

Criteria Description

Part 2: Aligning Instruction – Learning Objective and Alignment Rationale

5. Target

6 points

Concise learning objective that aligns with a selected standard is well-crafted. Alignment rationale is convincing.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Concise learning objective that aligns with a selected standard is appropriate. Alignment rationale is reasonable.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Learning objective lacks precision and/or unclearly aligns with a selected standard. Alignment rationale is vague.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Learning objective is ineffective or flawed and/or fails to align with a selected standard. Alignment rationale is unconvincing.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Introductory Activity

6 points

Criteria Description

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Introductory Activity

5. Target

6 points

Brief introductory activity to capture the students’ interest/attention at the beginning of the lesson is ideal.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Brief introductory activity to capture the students’ interest/attention at the beginning of the lesson is appropriate.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Brief introductory activity to capture the students’ interest/attention at the beginning of the lesson is underdeveloped.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Brief introductory activity to capture the students’ interest/attention at the beginning of the lesson is inappropriate.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Instructional Activity

6 points

Criteria Description

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Instructional Activity

5. Target

6 points

Instructional activity that aligns with the learning objective is ideal.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Instructional activity that aligns with the learning objective is appropriate.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Instructional activity that aligns with the learning objective is underdeveloped.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Instructional activity that aligns with the learning objective is inappropriate.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Closing Activity

6 points

Criteria Description

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Closing Activity

5. Target

6 points

Closing activity to summarize the content of the lesson is ideal.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Closing activity to summarize the content of the lesson is appropriate.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Closing activity to summarize the content of the lesson is underdeveloped.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Closing activity to summarize the content of the lesson is inappropriate.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Template Format

6 points

Criteria Description

Template Format

5. Target

6 points

Content is well-presented and easy to read. All template and format elements are correct.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Content is clear. Appropriate template is fully used. There are very few errors in formatting style.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Content is unfocused. Appropriate template is used, but formatting includes several errors or lack of clarity.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Content is confusing. Template is missing key elements or includes pervasive errors. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Mechanics of Writing

6 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

5. Target

6 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Rubicforlearningobjectiveweek1.docx

Rubric Criteria

collapse all Rubric CriteriaCollapse All

Part 1: Writing Learning Objectives

24 points

Criteria Description

Part 1: Writing Learning Objectives

5. Target

24 points

Concise learning objectives that align with the given standards are well-crafted. Alignment rationales for how each learning objective aligns with the state standard are convincing.

4. Acceptable

20.88 points

Concise learning objectives that align with the given standards are appropriate. Alignment rationales for how each learning objective aligns with the state standard are reasonable.

3. Approaching

17.76 points

Learning objectives lack precision and/or unclearly align with the given standards. Alignment rationales for how each learning objective aligns with the state standard are vague.

2. Insufficient

16.56 points

Learning objectives are ineffective or flawed and/or fail to align with the given standards. Alignment rationales for how each learning objective aligns with the state standard are unconvincing.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Part 2: Aligning Instruction – Learning Objective and Alignment Rationale

6 points

Criteria Description

Part 2: Aligning Instruction – Learning Objective and Alignment Rationale

5. Target

6 points

Concise learning objective that aligns with a selected standard is well-crafted. Alignment rationale is convincing.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Concise learning objective that aligns with a selected standard is appropriate. Alignment rationale is reasonable.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Learning objective lacks precision and/or unclearly aligns with a selected standard. Alignment rationale is vague.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Learning objective is ineffective or flawed and/or fails to align with a selected standard. Alignment rationale is unconvincing.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Introductory Activity

6 points

Criteria Description

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Introductory Activity

5. Target

6 points

Brief introductory activity to capture the students’ interest/attention at the beginning of the lesson is ideal.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Brief introductory activity to capture the students’ interest/attention at the beginning of the lesson is appropriate.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Brief introductory activity to capture the students’ interest/attention at the beginning of the lesson is underdeveloped.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Brief introductory activity to capture the students’ interest/attention at the beginning of the lesson is inappropriate.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Instructional Activity

6 points

Criteria Description

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Instructional Activity

5. Target

6 points

Instructional activity that aligns with the learning objective is ideal.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Instructional activity that aligns with the learning objective is appropriate.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Instructional activity that aligns with the learning objective is underdeveloped.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Instructional activity that aligns with the learning objective is inappropriate.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Closing Activity

6 points

Criteria Description

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Closing Activity

5. Target

6 points

Closing activity to summarize the content of the lesson is ideal.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Closing activity to summarize the content of the lesson is appropriate.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Closing activity to summarize the content of the lesson is underdeveloped.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Closing activity to summarize the content of the lesson is inappropriate.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Template Format

6 points

Criteria Description

Template Format

5. Target

6 points

Content is well-presented and easy to read. All template and format elements are correct.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Content is clear. Appropriate template is fully used. There are very few errors in formatting style.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Content is unfocused. Appropriate template is used, but formatting includes several errors or lack of clarity.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Content is confusing. Template is missing key elements or includes pervasive errors. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Mechanics of Writing

6 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

5. Target

6 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

LearningObjectiveinstructionweek1.docx

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

Complete the “Learning Objectives Practice” template to practice writing learning objectives aligned to Arizona state standards for different grade levels and to plan aligned instruction.

Part 1: Writing Learning Objectives

Write a concise learning objective based on each of the given state standards. Then in 50-100 words, provide a rationale for how each learning objective aligns with the state standard.

Part 2: Aligning Instruction

In 100-150 words, write a lesson summary of how you would teach the lesson. Include the following:

· Brief introductory activity to capture the students’ interest/attention at the beginning of the lesson.

· At least one instructional activity that aligns with the learning objective.

· Closing activity to summarize the content of the lesson.

Note: The selected grade level, ELA or math standard, and learning objective will be used throughout the rest of the assignments in this course.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite Technical Support Articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.P

Please use the required reference :

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Required

As applicable, review the Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts for a grade level of your choice to inform the topic assi

https://learning.ccsso.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/ELA_Standards1.pdf

Common Core State Standards for Mathematics

Required

As applicable, review the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics for a grade level of your choice to inform the topic assignment.

https://learning.ccsso.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Math_Standards1.pdf

Writing Lesson Objectives for Classroom Teachers

Required

Watch “Writing Lesson Objectives for Classroom Teachers,” located on YouTube (2018).

https://youtu.be/IS5wMv_ILXE

Lesson Plans

Required

Explore “Lesson Plans,” located on the ReadWriteThink website.

http://www.readwritethink.org/classroom-resources/lesson-plans/

Optional: An Analysis of Strategies for Teaching Standards-Based Lesson Plan Alignment to Preservice Teachers

Optional

Read “An Analysis of Strategies for Teaching Standards-Based Lesson Plan Alignment to Preservice Teachers,” by Drost and Levi

https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oc

-LearningObjectivesPracticeweek1.docx

A close-up of a logo Description automatically generated with low confidence

Learning Objectives Practice

Part 1: Writing Learning Objectives

State Standard	Learning Objective	Alignment Rationale
Fifth Grade English Language Arts: 5.RL.2: Determine a theme of a story, drama, or poem from details of the text; include how characters in story or drama respond to challenges, how the speaker in a poem reflects upon a topic, and a summary of the text.	Example: Students will describe the theme of a story by creating a tree map.	Example: This objective is aligned to the standard because the standard is measuring a student’s ability to determine the theme of either a story, drama, or poem. Since this standard has three different genres, it will need to be taught in multiple lessons. The focus of this lesson would be determining the theme of a story.
Kindergarten English Language Arts K.RL.1: With prompting and support, ask and answer questions about key details in a text.
First Grade Physical Education S1.E12 Manipulatives, Catching: Catches a soft object from a self-toss before it bounces.
Second Grade Mathematics 2.OA.C.3: Determine whether a group of objects (up to 20) has an odd or even number of members (e.g., by pairing objects or counting them by 2's).
Fourth Grade Science 4.E1U1.8: Collect, analyze, and interpret data to explain weather and climate patterns.
Eighth Grade Mathematics 8.SP.A.1: Construct and interpret scatter plots for bivariate measurement data to investigate and describe patterns such as clustering, outliers, positive or negative association, linear association, and nonlinear association.

Part 2: Aligning Instruction

Grade Level:

Subject Area (ELA or Math):

ELA or Math State Standard:

Learning Objective:

Alignment Rationale:

Lesson Summary:

image1.jpeg

Rubicforlearningobjectiveweek1.docx

Rubric Criteria

collapse all Rubric CriteriaCollapse All

Part 1: Writing Learning Objectives

24 points

Criteria Description

Part 1: Writing Learning Objectives

5. Target

24 points

Concise learning objectives that align with the given standards are well-crafted. Alignment rationales for how each learning objective aligns with the state standard are convincing.

4. Acceptable

20.88 points

Concise learning objectives that align with the given standards are appropriate. Alignment rationales for how each learning objective aligns with the state standard are reasonable.

3. Approaching

17.76 points

Learning objectives lack precision and/or unclearly align with the given standards. Alignment rationales for how each learning objective aligns with the state standard are vague.

2. Insufficient

16.56 points

Learning objectives are ineffective or flawed and/or fail to align with the given standards. Alignment rationales for how each learning objective aligns with the state standard are unconvincing.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Part 2: Aligning Instruction – Learning Objective and Alignment Rationale

6 points

Criteria Description

Part 2: Aligning Instruction – Learning Objective and Alignment Rationale

5. Target

6 points

Concise learning objective that aligns with a selected standard is well-crafted. Alignment rationale is convincing.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Concise learning objective that aligns with a selected standard is appropriate. Alignment rationale is reasonable.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Learning objective lacks precision and/or unclearly aligns with a selected standard. Alignment rationale is vague.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Learning objective is ineffective or flawed and/or fails to align with a selected standard. Alignment rationale is unconvincing.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Introductory Activity

6 points

Criteria Description

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Introductory Activity

5. Target

6 points

Brief introductory activity to capture the students’ interest/attention at the beginning of the lesson is ideal.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Brief introductory activity to capture the students’ interest/attention at the beginning of the lesson is appropriate.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Brief introductory activity to capture the students’ interest/attention at the beginning of the lesson is underdeveloped.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Brief introductory activity to capture the students’ interest/attention at the beginning of the lesson is inappropriate.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Instructional Activity

6 points

Criteria Description

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Instructional Activity

5. Target

6 points

Instructional activity that aligns with the learning objective is ideal.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Instructional activity that aligns with the learning objective is appropriate.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Instructional activity that aligns with the learning objective is underdeveloped.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Instructional activity that aligns with the learning objective is inappropriate.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Closing Activity

6 points

Criteria Description

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Closing Activity

5. Target

6 points

Closing activity to summarize the content of the lesson is ideal.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Closing activity to summarize the content of the lesson is appropriate.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Closing activity to summarize the content of the lesson is underdeveloped.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Closing activity to summarize the content of the lesson is inappropriate.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Template Format

6 points

Criteria Description

Template Format

5. Target

6 points

Content is well-presented and easy to read. All template and format elements are correct.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Content is clear. Appropriate template is fully used. There are very few errors in formatting style.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Content is unfocused. Appropriate template is used, but formatting includes several errors or lack of clarity.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Content is confusing. Template is missing key elements or includes pervasive errors. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Mechanics of Writing

6 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

5. Target

6 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

LearningObjectiveinstructionweek1.docx

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

Complete the “Learning Objectives Practice” template to practice writing learning objectives aligned to Arizona state standards for different grade levels and to plan aligned instruction.

Part 1: Writing Learning Objectives

Write a concise learning objective based on each of the given state standards. Then in 50-100 words, provide a rationale for how each learning objective aligns with the state standard.

Part 2: Aligning Instruction

In 100-150 words, write a lesson summary of how you would teach the lesson. Include the following:

· Brief introductory activity to capture the students’ interest/attention at the beginning of the lesson.

· At least one instructional activity that aligns with the learning objective.

· Closing activity to summarize the content of the lesson.

Note: The selected grade level, ELA or math standard, and learning objective will be used throughout the rest of the assignments in this course.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite Technical Support Articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.P

Please use the required reference :

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Required

As applicable, review the Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts for a grade level of your choice to inform the topic assi

https://learning.ccsso.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/ELA_Standards1.pdf

Common Core State Standards for Mathematics

Required

As applicable, review the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics for a grade level of your choice to inform the topic assignment.

https://learning.ccsso.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Math_Standards1.pdf

Writing Lesson Objectives for Classroom Teachers

Required

Watch “Writing Lesson Objectives for Classroom Teachers,” located on YouTube (2018).

https://youtu.be/IS5wMv_ILXE

Lesson Plans

Required

Explore “Lesson Plans,” located on the ReadWriteThink website.

http://www.readwritethink.org/classroom-resources/lesson-plans/

Optional: An Analysis of Strategies for Teaching Standards-Based Lesson Plan Alignment to Preservice Teachers

Optional

Read “An Analysis of Strategies for Teaching Standards-Based Lesson Plan Alignment to Preservice Teachers,” by Drost and Levi

https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oc

-LearningObjectivesPracticeweek1.docx

A close-up of a logo Description automatically generated with low confidence

Learning Objectives Practice

Part 1: Writing Learning Objectives

State Standard	Learning Objective	Alignment Rationale
Fifth Grade English Language Arts: 5.RL.2: Determine a theme of a story, drama, or poem from details of the text; include how characters in story or drama respond to challenges, how the speaker in a poem reflects upon a topic, and a summary of the text.	Example: Students will describe the theme of a story by creating a tree map.	Example: This objective is aligned to the standard because the standard is measuring a student’s ability to determine the theme of either a story, drama, or poem. Since this standard has three different genres, it will need to be taught in multiple lessons. The focus of this lesson would be determining the theme of a story.
Kindergarten English Language Arts K.RL.1: With prompting and support, ask and answer questions about key details in a text.
First Grade Physical Education S1.E12 Manipulatives, Catching: Catches a soft object from a self-toss before it bounces.
Second Grade Mathematics 2.OA.C.3: Determine whether a group of objects (up to 20) has an odd or even number of members (e.g., by pairing objects or counting them by 2's).
Fourth Grade Science 4.E1U1.8: Collect, analyze, and interpret data to explain weather and climate patterns.
Eighth Grade Mathematics 8.SP.A.1: Construct and interpret scatter plots for bivariate measurement data to investigate and describe patterns such as clustering, outliers, positive or negative association, linear association, and nonlinear association.

Part 2: Aligning Instruction

Grade Level:

Subject Area (ELA or Math):

ELA or Math State Standard:

Learning Objective:

Alignment Rationale:

Lesson Summary:

image1.jpeg

Rubicforlearningobjectiveweek1.docx

Rubric Criteria

collapse all Rubric CriteriaCollapse All

Part 1: Writing Learning Objectives

24 points

Criteria Description

Part 1: Writing Learning Objectives

5. Target

24 points

Concise learning objectives that align with the given standards are well-crafted. Alignment rationales for how each learning objective aligns with the state standard are convincing.

4. Acceptable

20.88 points

Concise learning objectives that align with the given standards are appropriate. Alignment rationales for how each learning objective aligns with the state standard are reasonable.

3. Approaching

17.76 points

Learning objectives lack precision and/or unclearly align with the given standards. Alignment rationales for how each learning objective aligns with the state standard are vague.

2. Insufficient

16.56 points

Learning objectives are ineffective or flawed and/or fail to align with the given standards. Alignment rationales for how each learning objective aligns with the state standard are unconvincing.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Part 2: Aligning Instruction – Learning Objective and Alignment Rationale

6 points

Criteria Description

Part 2: Aligning Instruction – Learning Objective and Alignment Rationale

5. Target

6 points

Concise learning objective that aligns with a selected standard is well-crafted. Alignment rationale is convincing.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Concise learning objective that aligns with a selected standard is appropriate. Alignment rationale is reasonable.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Learning objective lacks precision and/or unclearly aligns with a selected standard. Alignment rationale is vague.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Learning objective is ineffective or flawed and/or fails to align with a selected standard. Alignment rationale is unconvincing.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Introductory Activity

6 points

Criteria Description

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Introductory Activity

5. Target

6 points

Brief introductory activity to capture the students’ interest/attention at the beginning of the lesson is ideal.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Brief introductory activity to capture the students’ interest/attention at the beginning of the lesson is appropriate.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Brief introductory activity to capture the students’ interest/attention at the beginning of the lesson is underdeveloped.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Brief introductory activity to capture the students’ interest/attention at the beginning of the lesson is inappropriate.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Instructional Activity

6 points

Criteria Description

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Instructional Activity

5. Target

6 points

Instructional activity that aligns with the learning objective is ideal.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Instructional activity that aligns with the learning objective is appropriate.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Instructional activity that aligns with the learning objective is underdeveloped.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Instructional activity that aligns with the learning objective is inappropriate.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Closing Activity

6 points

Criteria Description

Part 2: Aligning Instruction: Lesson Summary - Closing Activity

5. Target

6 points

Closing activity to summarize the content of the lesson is ideal.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Closing activity to summarize the content of the lesson is appropriate.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Closing activity to summarize the content of the lesson is underdeveloped.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Closing activity to summarize the content of the lesson is inappropriate.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Template Format

6 points

Criteria Description

Template Format

5. Target

6 points

Content is well-presented and easy to read. All template and format elements are correct.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Content is clear. Appropriate template is fully used. There are very few errors in formatting style.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Content is unfocused. Appropriate template is used, but formatting includes several errors or lack of clarity.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Content is confusing. Template is missing key elements or includes pervasive errors. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Mechanics of Writing

6 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

5. Target

6 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable

5.22 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching

4.44 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

2. Insufficient

4.14 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

other Questions(10)