Human Resource Management Week 6 assignment
Please see attached.
3 years ago
15
Wk6.Assignment.docx
WK6PM570_v1_grading_rubrics.pdf
pm570_v1_wk6_risk_register_template.docx
- TheExecutiveDirector.pdf
Wk6.Assignment.docx
Wk 6 - Apply: Summative Assessment: Risk Register
Exam Content
1.
Top of Form
As a project manager, you must analyze projects for known and unknown risks, anticipate project risks, and manage that risk in different ways to ensure project success. A skill in risk assessment enables you to assess the internal and external factors that influence project success by planning for the risks that could potentially interfere with meeting that success.
For this assignment, choose the provided case studies. The Executive Director case provided by John Wiley & Sons. You must choose a different case than the one you used for your Week 4 Summative Assessment: Project Proposal.
Complete a risk register based on the case study using the Risk Register Template .
Identify 6 to 8 risks for the project identified in the case study, and do the following:
· Identify each risk. Consider the most common project risks for the selected case. Other risks may exist, but if they’re highly unlikely to occur or have a very low impact, then these may not be worth including in the risk register at this time.
· Describe each risk, highlighting the risk and the area of impact if the risk were to occur. The risk description should provide adequate detail to understand the risk to the project.
· Identify the owner of each risk. The owner is responsible for monitoring triggers and implementing the risk strategy. Consider who is impacted because the owner assumes that risk and decides what to do if the risk happens.
· Identify the risk trigger. Consider how the project team and stakeholders would be able to tell if the risk has occurred or is approaching.
· Choose the risk strategy (Accept, Avoid, Mitigate, or Transfer) and explain the risk response for that risk strategy:
· Accept it. Why you will not actively try to control this risk, and what resources must be reserved in case the risk occurs.
· Avoid it. How you will remove this risk by eliminating the cause or selecting an alternative.
· Mitigate it. How you can minimize the impact of the risk within acceptable limits.
· Transfer it. How you can reduce direct impact of the risk on the project by shifting all or part of this risk to a third party, such as vendor or insurer.
· Indicate the probability of the risk occurring at the current state. This may change over time, but what is important is to identify this probability today. Select from the following levels of probability:
· High – This risk has a 75% chance or greater of happening.
· Medium – This risk has a 25%–74% chance of occurring.
· Low – This risk has less than a 25% chance of happening.
· Indicate the level of impact to the organization if this risk happens. Select from the following levels of impact:
· High – This risk will impact the organization in an extremely negative way.
· Medium – This risk will impact the organization in a negative way, with some harm.
· Low – This risk will impact the organization in a negative way, but any harm will be manageable.
Please refer to the respective week's grading rubric when completing each Summative Assessment assignment.
Link to Grading Rubrics: PM/570 Grading Rubrics attached
Assignment Support
Access the exercise files for “Project Management Foundations: Risk” by Bob McGannon from LinkedIn Learning through the video link in this week’s Learning Activities folder.
WK6PM570_v1_grading_rubrics.pdf
Grading Rubrics PM/570 v1
Page 6 of 7
Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Wk 6 – Summative Assessment: Risk Register
Criteria and Weight Accomplished
90-100% A to A-
Emerging 70-89% B+ to C-
Beginning 50-69% D+ to F
Not Evident 0% F
1. Identify and describe each risk. Weight: 25%
Identification and descriptions of the risks were appropriate for the project and had thorough detail.
Identification and descriptions of the risks were mostly appropriate for the project and had adequate detail.
Identification and descriptions of the risks were somewhat appropriate for the project and had limited detail.
Identification and descriptions of the risks appropriate for the project were not evident.
2. Identify the owner of each risk, who will monitor triggers and implement the risk strategy. Weight: 5%
Identification of risk owners to monitor risk triggers and implement risk strategy was clear and complete.
Identification of risk owners to monitor risk triggers and implement risk strategy was mostly clear and nearly complete.
Identification of risk owners to monitor risk triggers and implement risk strategy was somewhat clear and minimally complete.
Identification of risk owners to monitor risk triggers and implement risk strategy was not evident.
3. Identify the risk trigger. Weight: 20%
Identification of the risk trigger was clear.
Identification of the risk trigger was mostly clear.
Identification of the risk trigger was somewhat clear.
Identification of the risk trigger was not evident.
4. Choose the risk strategy and explain the risk response for that risk strategy. Weight: 20%
Selection of the risk strategies and explanations showed considerable insight and understanding of the risks and how to manage risk occurrence.
Selection of the risk strategies and explanations showed insight and understanding of the risks and how to manage risk occurrence.
Selection of the risk strategies and explanations showed limited insight and understanding of the risks and how to manage risk occurrence.
Selection of the risk strategies and explanations were not evident.
5. Indicate the probability of the risk occurring. Weight: 20%
Indication of the probably of occurrence and the level of impact of risk occurrence was realistic.
Indication of the probably of occurrence and the level of impact of risk occurrence was mostly realistic.
Indication of the probably of occurrence and the level of impact of risk occurrence was somewhat realistic.
Indication of the probably of occurrence and the level of impact of risk occurrence was not evident.
Grading Rubrics PM/570 v1
Page 7 of 7
Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Criteria and Weight Accomplished
90-100% A to A-
Emerging 70-89% B+ to C-
Beginning 50-69% D+ to F
Not Evident 0% F
7. Critical thinking: Identify the Problem Weight: 10%
Thoroughly identified and defined the problem and provided supporting information for understanding.
Moderately identified and defined the problem and provided supporting information for understanding.
Vaguely identified and defined the problem and provided supporting information for understanding.
Did not or incorrectly identified and defined the problem and provided supporting information for understanding.
1. Identify and describe each risk. Weight: 25%
Identification and descriptions of the risks were appropriate for the project and had thorough detail.
Identification and descriptions of the risks were mostly appropriate for the project and had adequate detail.
Identification and descriptions of the risks were somewhat appropriate for the project and had limited detail.
Identification and descriptions of the risks appropriate for the project were not evident.
- PM/570 Grading Rubrics
- Wk 2 – Summative Assessment: Project Communication Matrix
- Wk 4 – Summative Assessment: Project Proposal
- Wk 6 – Summative Assessment: Risk Register
pm570_v1_wk6_risk_register_template.docx
PM/570 v1
Risk Register Template
PM/570 v1
Page 2 of 2
Risk Register Template
Complete the table below based on your chosen case study. The first column indicates the risk number, which is used as a label to help others easily identify which risk you are addressing. In the second column, write a description of the risk. In the third column, write the owner of the risk. In the fourth column, write what may trigger the risk. In the fifth column, write the strategy to use and the response to the risk. In the sixth column, write the probability of the risk occurring. In the seventh column, write the risk’s level of impact.
Identify 6 to 8 risks from the case study. An example is provided in the first row.
|
Risk # |
Risk Description |
Risk Owner |
Risk Trigger |
Risk Strategy & Response |
Probability of Occurrence |
Level of Impact |
|
Ex: |
If there are high winds during the event, then it could cause damage to technical equipment |
Technical Engineer |
Weather reports of high wind |
Mitigate: Identify resources that could potentially protect equipment from damage |
High |
High |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
image1.png
- stats200 week_5 homework
- Need psychology help
- Help Please!!
- public admin
- CHS4
- ACC 561, ACC-561, ACC561, ACC/561, ACC Week 5 Learning Team CVP And Break-Even Analysis Paper and Presentation Management Accounting The successful business plan: Secrets & strategies (4th ed.). Palo Alto, CA:
- IT HAS TO BE AN ORGINAL PAPER OR I WILL GET A O!
- human resourse
- GED 260 Criminology Unit 3
- Who will dominate a republican government? What is the remedy for this? Would an absolute veto remedy this?