Human Resource Management ADD5106: Week 9 Assignment: Additional Screening and Assessment Tools
Please see attached.
3 years ago
30
ADD5106_Week9Assignment_AdditionalScreeningandAssessmentTools-GoogleDocs.pdf
ADD5106_Week9Assignment_AdditionalScreeningandAssessmentTools-GoogleDocs.pdf
ADD5106: Week 9 Assignment: Additional Screening and Assessment Tools
Assignment Instructions 1. Identify how suicide risk is assessed or screened for.
○ Provide examples of assessment or screening tools available to determine level of risk associated with suicide and/or violence for a client.
2. Identify how to determine the appropriate level of care for a client in addictions treatment.
○ Provide examples of assessment or screening tools available to determine appropriate level of care for a client.
3. Identify how stage of change is determined. ○ Provide examples of additional assessment or screening
tools available to determine the client's stage of change. 4. Analyze what types of ethical considerations must be addressed
when using the assessment or screening tools. ○ What specific ethical codes are used to address these
considerations?
Assignment Requirements ● Written communication: Written communication must be free of
errors such that the overall message is clear. ● APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according
to current APA style. ● Length of paper: 4–5 double-spaced, typed pages, excluding title
and reference pages. ● Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Week 9 Assignment: Additional Screening and Assessment Tools
Criteria Ratings Pts
Evaluate identified
instruments used to
screen and assess
suicide risk. view longer description
50 to >42.5 pts DISTINGUISHED Evaluates identified instruments used to screen and assess suicide risk and provides recommendations for how to interpret the data. 42.5 to >35 pts PROFICIENT Evaluates identified instruments used to screen and assess suicide risk. 35 to >0 pts BASIC Identifies but does not evaluate instruments used to screen and assess suicide risk. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not evaluate identified instruments used to screen and assess suicide risk.
/ 50 pts
Evaluate identified
instruments to determine the
most appropriate level of care for clients in
addiction treatment.
view longer description
50 to >42.5 pts DISTINGUISHED Evaluates identified instruments to determine the most appropriate level of care for clients in addiction treatment and discusses the specific levels of care. 42.5 to >35 pts PROFICIENT Evaluates identified instruments to determine the most appropriate level of care for clients in addiction treatment. 35 to >0 pts BASIC
/ 50 pts
Identifies but does not evaluate instruments to determine the most appropriate level of care for clients in addiction treatment. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not evaluate identified instruments to determine the most appropriate level of care for clients in addiction treatment.
Evaluate how the stage of change is
determined. view longer description
50 to >42.5 pts DISTINGUISHED Evaluates how the stage of change is determined and describes how stages of change are linked to the treatment planning process. 42.5 to >35 pts PROFICIENT Evaluates how the stage of change is determined. 35 to >0 pts BASIC Discusses but does not evaluate how the stage of change is determined. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not evaluate how the stage of change is determined.
/ 50 pts
Analyze ethical
consideration s that must be addressed in a case study. view longer description
50 to >42.5 pts DISTINGUISHED Analyzes identified types of ethical considerations that must be addressed in the screening and assessment tools. In addition, identifies appropriate ethical codes to guide the assessment process. 42.5 to >35 pts PROFICIENT Analyzes ethical considerations that must be addressed in a case study. 35 to >0 pts BASIC Identifies but does not analyze ethical considerations that must be addressed in a case study. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not analyze ethical considerations that must be addressed in a case study.
/ 50 pts
Communicate effectively
through the consistent use of grammar, punctuation,
and mechanics expected of an addiction professional. view longer description
50 to >42.5 pts DISTINGUISHED Communicates effectively through writing that is free of errors and that shows the consistent use of grammar, punctuation, and mechanics expected of an addiction professional. 42.5 to >35 pts PROFICIENT Communicates effectively through the consistent use of grammar, punctuation, and mechanics expected of an addiction professional. 35 to >0 pts BASIC
/ 50 pts
Inconsistently communicates through the use of grammar, punctuation, and mechanics expected of an addiction professional. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not communicate effectively through the consistent use of grammar, punctuation, and mechanics expected of an addiction professional.
- FIN 571 Week 1 DQs. Get an A++.
- BUS 644 Week 6 DQs. Get an A++.
- BUS 308 Week 4 DQs. Get an A++.
- zzzzz
- BSA 310 Week 5 Learning Team Assignment Service Request SR-rm-012 Paper and Presentation
- GB590-02N Unit2
- GB570-UNIT-6-PIP
- BUS 630 Week 5 DQs. Get an A++.
- The following data are from a completely randomized design
- XHTML ASSIGNMENT ATTACHED IS WHAT U GTA DO