Human Resource Management ADD5106: Week 9 Assignment: Additional Screening and Assessment Tools

profileTierainie

Please see attached.

  • 3 years ago
  • 30
files (1)

ADD5106_Week9Assignment_AdditionalScreeningandAssessmentTools-GoogleDocs.pdf

ADD5106: Week 9 Assignment: Additional Screening and Assessment Tools

Assignment Instructions 1. Identify how suicide risk is assessed or screened for.

○ Provide examples of assessment or screening tools available to determine level of risk associated with suicide and/or violence for a client.

2. Identify how to determine the appropriate level of care for a client in addictions treatment.

○ Provide examples of assessment or screening tools available to determine appropriate level of care for a client.

3. Identify how stage of change is determined. ○ Provide examples of additional assessment or screening

tools available to determine the client's stage of change. 4. Analyze what types of ethical considerations must be addressed

when using the assessment or screening tools. ○ What specific ethical codes are used to address these

considerations?

Assignment Requirements ● Written communication: Written communication must be free of

errors such that the overall message is clear. ● APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according

to current APA style. ● Length of paper: 4–5 double-spaced, typed pages, excluding title

and reference pages. ● Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

Week 9 Assignment: Additional Screening and Assessment Tools

Criteria Ratings Pts

Evaluate identified

instruments used to

screen and assess

suicide risk. view longer description

50 to >42.5 pts DISTINGUISHED Evaluates identified instruments used to screen and assess suicide risk and provides recommendations for how to interpret the data. 42.5 to >35 pts PROFICIENT Evaluates identified instruments used to screen and assess suicide risk. 35 to >0 pts BASIC Identifies but does not evaluate instruments used to screen and assess suicide risk. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not evaluate identified instruments used to screen and assess suicide risk.

/ 50 pts

Evaluate identified

instruments to determine the

most appropriate level of care for clients in

addiction treatment.

view longer description

50 to >42.5 pts DISTINGUISHED Evaluates identified instruments to determine the most appropriate level of care for clients in addiction treatment and discusses the specific levels of care. 42.5 to >35 pts PROFICIENT Evaluates identified instruments to determine the most appropriate level of care for clients in addiction treatment. 35 to >0 pts BASIC

/ 50 pts

Identifies but does not evaluate instruments to determine the most appropriate level of care for clients in addiction treatment. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not evaluate identified instruments to determine the most appropriate level of care for clients in addiction treatment.

Evaluate how the stage of change is

determined. view longer description

50 to >42.5 pts DISTINGUISHED Evaluates how the stage of change is determined and describes how stages of change are linked to the treatment planning process. 42.5 to >35 pts PROFICIENT Evaluates how the stage of change is determined. 35 to >0 pts BASIC Discusses but does not evaluate how the stage of change is determined. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not evaluate how the stage of change is determined.

/ 50 pts

Analyze ethical

consideration s that must be addressed in a case study. view longer description

50 to >42.5 pts DISTINGUISHED Analyzes identified types of ethical considerations that must be addressed in the screening and assessment tools. In addition, identifies appropriate ethical codes to guide the assessment process. 42.5 to >35 pts PROFICIENT Analyzes ethical considerations that must be addressed in a case study. 35 to >0 pts BASIC Identifies but does not analyze ethical considerations that must be addressed in a case study. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not analyze ethical considerations that must be addressed in a case study.

/ 50 pts

Communicate effectively

through the consistent use of grammar, punctuation,

and mechanics expected of an addiction professional. view longer description

50 to >42.5 pts DISTINGUISHED Communicates effectively through writing that is free of errors and that shows the consistent use of grammar, punctuation, and mechanics expected of an addiction professional. 42.5 to >35 pts PROFICIENT Communicates effectively through the consistent use of grammar, punctuation, and mechanics expected of an addiction professional. 35 to >0 pts BASIC

/ 50 pts

Inconsistently communicates through the use of grammar, punctuation, and mechanics expected of an addiction professional. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not communicate effectively through the consistent use of grammar, punctuation, and mechanics expected of an addiction professional.