Human Resource Management

Criteria

Excellent

Proficient

Developing

Needs Improvement

Not Submitted

Criterion Score

Executive Summary

20 points

20 Points

Clearly summarizes situation, key findings, and provides 2+ high-level recommendations.

17 points

17 Points

Clearly summarizes with at least 1 recommendation included.

15 points

15  Points

Basic summary with no clear recommendations.

12 points

12 Points

Summary is unclear, incomplete, or recommendations missing.

0 points

0 Points

Not submitted.

Score of Executive Summary,

/ 20

Introduction & Context

15 points

15 Points

Clearly defines purpose, provides complete background on company and industry.

13 points

13 Points

Clearly defines purpose and includes general company and industry background.

11 points

11 Points

Purpose or background is partially unclear or incomplete.

9 points

9 Points

Significant gaps or errors in purpose or background.

0 points

0 Points

Not submitted.

Score of Introduction & Context,

/ 15

Economic Environment Analysis

25 points

25 Points

Clearly identifies and explains 3+ economic factors, their potential impacts, and market trends with numeric data.

22 points

22 Points

Identifies and explains at least 2 economic factors clearly, with some numeric data.

19 points

19 Points

Identifies and briefly explains at least 1 economic factor, with minimal numeric data.

15 points

15 Points

 Economic factors unclear or incomplete, lacking numeric data.

0 points

0 Points

Not submitted.

Score of Economic Environment Analysis,

/ 25

Financial Tool Assessment

25 points

25 Points

Clearly assesses strengths/limitations of all 3 tools (break-even, CVP, ABC), identifies 1 additional tool with clear rationale.

22 points

22 Points

Clearly assesses strengths/limitations of at least 2 tools, identifies 1 additional tool.

19 points

19 Points

 Basic assessment of at least 1 tool, minimal or unclear additional tool.

15 points

15  Points

Assessment unclear or incorrect; additional tool missing.

0 points

0 Points

Not submitted.

Score of Financial Tool Assessment,

/ 25

Break-Even & CVP Analysis Interpretation

25 points

25 Points

Clearly interprets break-even and CVP results, with 3+ numeric references, clearly identifying implications and profitability.

22 points

22 Points

Clearly interprets with 2 numeric references, identifies implications.

19 points

19 Points

Basic interpretation with at least 1 numeric reference, limited implications.

15 points

15 Points

Interpretation vague or incorrect, numeric references missing or incorrect.

0 points

0 Points

Not submitted.

Score of Break-Even & CVP Analysis Interpretation,

/ 25

Recommendations & Implementation

20 points

20 Points

Provides 3+ specific, quantifiable recommendations with clearly outlined risk mitigation and implementation timeline.

17 points

17 Points

Provides 2 clear recommendations with basic risk mitigation and timeline.

15 points

15 Points

Provides at least 1 basic recommendation, limited detail on risk or implementation.

12 points

12 Points

Recommendations unclear, unquantifiable, or lacking implementation details.

0 points

0 Points

Not submitted.

Score of Recommendations & Implementation,

/ 20

Presentation, Organization & Citations

10 points

10 Points

Professional formatting, logical structure, clear visuals, and fully correct APA citations.

8 points

8 Points

Minor formatting or citation errors (1-2 errors).

7 points

7 Points

Several formatting or citation errors (3-4 errors); visuals unclear or limited.

5 points

5 Points

Poor formatting, numerous errors (>4 errors), visuals missing or irrelevant.

0 points

0 Points

Not submitted.

Score of Presentation, Organization & Citations,

/ 10

Skills

10 points

10 Points

The student skillfully and consistently integrates relevant skills into the assignment. Application is accurate, contextually appropriate, and enhances the depth or originality of the assignment. Demonstrates mastery through insightful use of skills.

8 points

8 Points

The student applies relevant skills accurately and appropriately. The use of skills supports key ideas or analysis and demonstrates a strong understanding. Integration is effective but may lack the depth or originality of a mastery-level response.

7 points

7 Points

The student applies relevant skills inconsistently or with partial success. Connections to the assignment may be unclear, generalized, or only loosely aligned with the topic. Demonstrates a basic understanding but limited integration.

5 points

5 Points

The student attempoints to apply relevant skills but with evident inaccuracies, oversimplifications, or weak alignment with the assignment content. Demonstrates limited awareness and understanding.