Human Resource Management
Individual Research
a year ago
60
IndividualResearchPaper.docx
IndividualResearchPaper.docx
Purpose
This assignment gives you an opportunity to investigate trends in a topic related to virtual and global teams. You must complete this assignment individually, without contacting other students, and you may not use a paper or any part of a paper from a previous class or from another person. If you have any questions about this assignment, please post them in the Ask the Professor discussion forum so that everyone can benefit from the answers. This assignment addresses Course Objectives 3, 4, and 5.
Task
Pick a topic related to virtual and global teams that interests you and explore it further in 6-8 pages. Sample topics: use of technology among virtual teams; team-based rewards and recognition programs; characteristics of effective leaders of virtual teams; use of virtual teams in global corporations; theories of virtual team development. Identify and discuss the trends in your chosen topic area.
Support your opinions and statements with a minimum of five references from sources published within the last ten years and integrate appropriate concepts and theories from our work over the semester. You can cite scholarly and practitioner-oriented journals, newspaper articles, and YouTube videos about the topic, but not Wikipedia, consulting company websites, or other non-academic sources. Please use the UMGC library to conduct a search for appropriate sources of information. You can access the library through the Resources section of our classroom (on the ribbon above the course title banner) or directly at https://libguides.umgc.edu/home . Librarians are available by phone, email, and chat; they can help you narrow your topic, create a search strategy, and identify appropriate sources.
Writing should be in third person. For help with writing in the third person
|
Knowledge of Relevant Theories and Concepts |
Student demonstrated exceptional knowledge of relevant theories and concepts from the course; all statements and opinions were supported by appropriate citations from the literature. |
Student demonstrated satisfactory knowledge of relevant theories and concepts from the course; most statements and opinions were supported by appropriate citations from the literature.
|
Student demonstrated less than satisfactory knowledge of relevant theories and concepts from the course; some statements and opinions were not supported by appropriate citations from the literature. |
Student demonstrated unsatisfactory knowledge of relevant theories and concepts from the course; many statements and opinions were not supported by appropriate citations from the literature. |
Score of Knowledge of Relevant Theories and Concepts, / 40 |
|
Quality of Topic Application |
Student did excellent work in translating theory into practical application, with the use of 2 or more examples. |
Student did a satisfactory job translating theory in practical application by using 1 or more examples. |
Student made a less than satisfactory effort in translating the theory into application. There was 1 or no examples. |
Application section was missing. |
Score of Quality of Topic Application, / 40 |
|
Criteria |
A 40 points |
B 30 points |
C 20 points |
F 10 points |
Criterion Score |
|
Quality of Interpreting the Theory/Research |
Student did an exceptional job of researching the topic and integrating course materials with the research. Student cited more than the minimum number of references; sources listed were all scholarly or practitioner journals, newspapers, annual reports, or academic books from the last ten years. |
Student did a satisfactory job of researching the topic and integrating course materials with the research. Student cited the minimum number of references; sources listed were primarily scholarly or practitioner journals, newspapers, annual reports, or academic books from the last ten years. |
Student did a less than satisfactory job of researching the topic and integrating course materials with the research. Student may not have cited the minimum number of references; some sources listed were not scholarly or practitioner journals, newspapers, annual reports, or academic books from the last ten years. |
Student did an inadequate job of researching the topic and integrating course materials with the research. Student did not cite the minimum number of references; many of the sources listed were not scholarly or practitioner journals, newspapers, annual reports, or academic books from the last ten years. |
Score of Quality of Interpreting the Theory/Research, / 40 |
|
Presentation of Ideas and Mechanics |
Student presented ideas in a compelling manner with no distracting grammar or spelling problems; the page length requirement was met. |
Student presented ideas presented in a clear, coherent manner with few distracting grammar or spelling problems; the page length requirement was met. |
Student presented ideas in a somewhat organized manner with several distracting grammar or spelling problems; the page length requirement may not have been met. |
Student presented ideas in a poorly organized or incoherent manner with many distracting grammar or spelling problems; the page length requirement may not have been met. |
Score of Presentation of Ideas and Mechanics, / 40 |
|
Formatting, APA in-text citation management and reference list accuracy |
All citations, quotations, and references were properly formatted or contained one or two minor errors. |
Most citations, quotations, and references were properly formatted or contained a few minor errors. |
Some citations, quotations, and references were not properly formatted or contained major errors. |
Most citations, quotations, and references were not properly formatted or contained many errors |
|