HOW HAS NURSING INFORMATICS AND TECHNOLOGY IMPACTED YOUR PRACTICE?

NURS_8210_Week3_Blog_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting: Idea and Content (40 points)

40 to >29.0 ptsExcellent• Thoroughly responds to the blog prompt/s. • Post provides comprehensive insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are clearly related to the topic, activity or process identified in blog prompts. • The post reflects in-depth engagement with the topic. • Detailed reply to faculty.

29 to >19.0 ptsGood• Responds to all of the blog prompt/s. • Post provides insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a reasonably focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are but not fully developed to align with blog prompts. • The post reflects moderate engagement with the topic. • Appropriate reply to faculty.

19 to >9.0 ptsFair• Partially responds to the blog prompt/s. • Posts are typically short and may contain some irrelevant material. • The post is mostly description or summary without connections or analysis between ideas. • The post reflects minimal engagement with the topic. • Brief response to faculty with minimal effort.

9 to >0 ptsPoor• Does not respond to the blog prompt/s or entries lack insight, depth or are superficial. • The entries are short and are frequently irrelevant to the events. • They do not express opinion clearly and show little understanding. • The post does not reflect engagement with the topic. • Fails to respond to faculty inquiries.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response: (30 points) Post to classmate’s main blog post shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic.

30 to >21.0 ptsExcellent• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to classmate’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts on separate day.

21 to >12.0 ptsGood• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to classmate’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts on separate day.

12 to >4.0 ptsFair• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to classmate’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with classmate. • Posts on separate day.

4 to >0 ptsPoor• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to classmate’s post. • The post does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the classmate. • Posts on same day.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response: (30 points) Post to second classmate’s blog post shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic.

30 to >21.0 ptsExcellent• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to classmate’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts on separate day.

21 to >12.0 ptsGood• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to classmate’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts on separate day.

12 to >4.0 ptsFair• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to classmate’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with classmate. • Posts on separate day.

4 to >0 ptsPoor• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to classmate’s post. • The does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the classmate. • Posts on same day.

30 pts

NURS_8210_Week3_Blog_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting: Idea and Content (40 points)

40 to >29.0 ptsExcellent• Thoroughly responds to the blog prompt/s. • Post provides comprehensive insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are clearly related to the topic, activity or process identified in blog prompts. • The post reflects in-depth engagement with the topic. • Detailed reply to faculty.

29 to >19.0 ptsGood• Responds to all of the blog prompt/s. • Post provides insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a reasonably focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are but not fully developed to align with blog prompts. • The post reflects moderate engagement with the topic. • Appropriate reply to faculty.

19 to >9.0 ptsFair• Partially responds to the blog prompt/s. • Posts are typically short and may contain some irrelevant material. • The post is mostly description or summary without connections or analysis between ideas. • The post reflects minimal engagement with the topic. • Brief response to faculty with minimal effort.

9 to >0 ptsPoor• Does not respond to the blog prompt/s or entries lack insight, depth or are superficial. • The entries are short and are frequently irrelevant to the events. • They do not express opinion clearly and show little understanding. • The post does not reflect engagement with the topic. • Fails to respond to faculty inquiries.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response: (30 points) Post to classmate’s main blog post shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic.

30 to >21.0 ptsExcellent• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to classmate’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts on separate day.

21 to >12.0 ptsGood• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to classmate’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts on separate day.

12 to >4.0 ptsFair• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to classmate’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with classmate. • Posts on separate day.

4 to >0 ptsPoor• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to classmate’s post. • The post does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the classmate. • Posts on same day.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response: (30 points) Post to second classmate’s blog post shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic.

30 to >21.0 ptsExcellent• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to classmate’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts on separate day.

21 to >12.0 ptsGood• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to classmate’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts on separate day.

12 to >4.0 ptsFair• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to classmate’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with classmate. • Posts on separate day.

4 to >0 ptsPoor• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to classmate’s post. • The does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the classmate. • Posts on same day.

30 pts