help with vocab due in 24 hours
attached
2 years ago
16
Assignmentvocab.docx
Read.docx
LectureNotesonArgumentation.docx
- basic-principles-of-persuasive-writing.pdf
- English-Composition2.pdf
Assignmentvocab.docx
Assignment: Define these Vocabulary Word
The Purpose of Persuasive/Argumentative Writing The purpose of persuasion in writing is to convince, motivate, or move readers toward a certain point of view or opinion. The very act of trying to persuade implies more than one opinion on the subject can be argued. The idea of an argument often conjures up images of two people yelling and screaming in anger. Instructions: read the textbook under the icon= Course Textbook; review lecture notes, and the powerpoint on Argumentation. All of this information will aid you in understanding and define the argumentative terms provided below.
Assignment: Define the following terms. Type your definitions in a Word document. Save your file and submit it as an attachment.
In the heading of your paper include your name, date, course, and title of the assignment to the left of your margin; Use at least 12-inch font. Be sure to number each term.
Type your definitions in a Word document. In the heading of your paper include your name, date, course, and assignment title to the left of your margin. Be sure to number each term.
Vocabulary Words:
Argument
deductive reasoning
persuasion
ethos
pathos
logos
fact
opinions
expert opinion
credibility
evidence
plagiarism
journal
relevant
representative
documentation
premise
Rogerian Argument
Aristotelian Argument
Toulmin model of argument
MLA style
APA style
claim
validity
concession
fallacies
inductive reasoning
paraphrase
refutation
syllogism
antithesis
Begging the question (define and give an example)
Argument from Analogy (define and give an example)
Red Herring (define and give an example)
Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc (define and give an example)
Non-Sequitur (define and give an example)
Read.docx
Read: Glossary of Terms
Abstract language names concepts or qualities that cannot be directly seen or touched: love, emotion, evil, anguish. Concrete language denotes objects or qualities that the senses can perceive: such as, fountain pen, leaky, shouting, rancid. Abstract words are sometimes needed to express ideas, but they are very vague unless used with concrete supporting detail. The abstract phrase “The speaker was overcome with emotion” could mean almost anything, but the addition of concrete language clarifies the meaning: “He clenched his fist and shook it at the crowd” (anger). Allusion is a brief reference to literature, history, the Bible, mythology, popular culture, and so on that readers are expected to recognize. An allusion evokes a vivid impression in very few words. “The gardener opened the gate, and suddenly we found ourselves in Eden” suggests in one word (Eden) the stunning beauty of the garden. Analogy is a form of comparison that explains an unfamiliar element by comparing it to another that is more familiar. Analogies also enable writers to put abstract or technical information in simpler, more concrete terms: “The effect of pollution on the environment is like that of cancer on the body.” Annotating is the technique of recording one’s responses to a reading selection by writing notes in the margins of the text. Annotating a text might involve asking questions, suggesting possible parallels with other selections or with the reader’s own experience, arguing with the writer’s points, commenting on the writer’s style, or defining unfamiliar terms or concepts. Antithesis is a viewpoint opposite to one expressed in a thesis. In an argumentative essay, the thesis must be debatable. If no antithesis exists, the writer’s thesis is not debatable. Antonym is a word opposite in meaning to another word. Beautiful is the antonym of ugly. Synonym is the antonym of antonym. Argumentation is the form of writing that takes a stand on an issue and attempts to convince readers by presenting a logical sequence of points supported by evidence. Unlike persuasion, which uses a number of different appeals, argumentation is primarily an appeal to reason. Unlike persuasion, which uses a number of different appeals, argumentation is primarily an appeal to reason. The Audience is the people “listening” to a writer’s words. Writers who are sensitive to their audience will carefully choose a tone, examples, and allusions that their readers will understand and respond to. For instance, an effective article attempting to persuade high school students not to drink alcohol would use examples and allusions pertinent to a teenager’s life. Different examples would be chosen if the writer were addressing middle-aged members of Alcoholics Anonymous. Claim in Toulmin’s logic, is the thesis or main point of an essay. Usually the claim is stated directly, but sometimes it is implied. Deductive reasoning is the method of reasoning that moves from a general premise to a specific conclusion. Deductive reasoning is the opposite of inductive reasoning. (See also Syllogism.) Fallacy A statement that resembles a logical argument but is actually flawed. Logical fallacies are often persuasive, but they unfairly manipulate readers to win agreement . Fallacies include begging the question; argument from analogy; personal (ad hominem) attacks; jumping to a conclusion (hasty or sweeping generalizations); false dilemmas (the either and or fallacy); equivocation; What does red herring is something intended to divert attention from the real problem or matter at hand; a misleading clue.
There are fallacy that appeals to misleading statistics; post hoc reasoning; and non sequiturs. The appeal to authority fallacy is a fallacy of relevance. It occurs when someone uses an expert's opinion to support an argument. This can happen when someone cites an authority figure who is not qualified to make reliable claims about the topic. What is the misleading statistics fallacy?
When the statistical reason involved is false or misapplied, this constitutes a statistical fallacy. The false statistics trap can be quite damaging for the quest for knowledge. For example, in medical science, correcting a falsehood may take decades and cost lives. Misuses can be easy to fall into. The post hoc fallacy is a logical fallacy that assumes that one event must have caused another event because it happened before it. The term comes from the Latin phrase post hoc ergo propter hoc, which translates to "after this, therefore because of this."
Inductive reasoning is the method of reasoning that moves from specific evidence to a general conclusion based on this evidence. Inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Paraphrase is the restatement of another person’s words in one’s own words, following the order and emphasis of the original. Paraphrase is frequently used in source-based papers, where the purpose is to use information gathered during research to support the ideas in the paper. For example, Bruce Catton’s “Grant was the modern man emerging; beyond him, ready to come on the stage, was the great age of steel and machinery, of crowded cities and a restless burgeoning vitality” might be paraphrased as, “Grant was a man of a new era; following him, glimpsed but not fully seen, was the time of new technologies, with its crowded urban life and growing restlessness.” Persuasion is the method a writer uses to move an audience to adopt a belief or follow a course of action. To persuade an audience, a writer relies on the various appeals — to the emotions, to reason, or to ethics. Persuasion is different from argumentation, which appeals primarily to reason. Plagiarism is presenting the words or ideas of someone else as if they were one’s own (whether intentionally or unintentionally). Plagiarism should always be avoided. Rogerian argument is a strategy put forth by psychologist Carl Rogers that rejects the adversarial approach that characterizes many arguments. Rather than attacking the opposition, Rogers suggests acknowledging the validity of opposing positions. By finding areas of agreement, a Rogerian argument reduces conflict and increases the chance that the final position will satisfy all parties. Toulmin logic is a method of structuring an argument according to the way arguments occur in everyday life. Developed by philosopher Stephen Toulmin. Toulmin logic divides an argument into three parts: the claim, the grounds, and the warrant.
LectureNotesonArgumentation.docx
1
Lecture Notes on Argumentation
Argumentation is a process of reasoning that asserts the soundness of a debatable position, belief, or conclusion. Argumentation takes a stand — supported by evidence — and urges people to share the writer’s perspective and insights.
Although the terms persuasion and argumentation are frequently used interchangeably, they do not mean the same thing. Persuasion is a general term that refers to how a writer influences an audience to adopt a belief or follow a course of action. To persuade an audience, a writer relies on various kinds of appeals — appeals based on emotion (pathos), appeals based on logic (logos), and appeals based on the character reputation of the writer (ethos). Argumentation is the appeal to reason (logos). In an argument, a writer connects a series of statements so that they lead logically to a conclusion. Argumentation is different from persuasion in that it does not try to move an audience to action; its primary purpose is to demonstrate that certain ideas are valid and others are not. Moreover, unlike persuasion, argumentation has a formal structure: an argument makes points, supplies evidence, establishes a logical chain of reasoning, refutes opposing arguments, and accommodates the audience’s views. Most effective arguments combine two or more appeals: even though their primary appeal is to reason, they may also appeal to emotions. For example, you could use a combination of logical and emotional appeals to argue against lowering the drinking age in your state from twenty-one to eighteen. You could appeal to reason by constructing an argument leading to the conclusion that the state should not condone policies that have a high probability of injuring or killing citizens. You could support your conclusion by presenting statistics showing that alcohol-related traffic accidents kill more teenagers than disease does. You could also cite a study showing that when the drinking age was raised from eighteen to twenty-one, fatal accidents declined. In addition, you could include an appeal to the emotions by telling a particularly sad story about an eighteen-year-old alcoholic or by pointing out how an increased number of accidents involving drunk drivers would cost some innocent people their lives. These appeals to your audience’s emotions could strengthen your argument by widening its appeal. Keep in mind, however, that in an effective argument emotion does not take the place of logic; it supports and reinforces it. The appeals you choose and how you balance them depend in part on your purpose and your sense of your audience. As you consider what strategies to use, remember that some extremely effective appeals are unfair. Although most people would agree that lies, threats, misleading statements, and appeals to greed and prejudice are unacceptable ways of reaching an audience, such appeals are used in daily conversation, in political campaigns, and even in international diplomacy. Nevertheless, in your college writing you should use only those appeals that most people would consider fair. To do otherwise will undercut your audience’s belief in your trustworthiness and weaken your argument.
Planning an Argumentative Essay
1. Select a topic-In an argumentative essay, as in all writing, choosing the right topic is important. Ideally, you should have an intellectual or emotional stake in your topic. Still, you should be open-minded and willing to consider all sides of a question. If the evidence goes against your position, you should be willing to change your position. You should also be able, from the outset, to consider your topic from other people’s viewpoints; this will help you determine what their beliefs are and how they are likely to react.
2. Develop a thesis-Keep in mind that in an argumentative essay, your thesis must take a stand — in other words, it must be debatable. A good argumentative thesis states a proposition that at least some people will object to.
· Thesis: Education is the best way to address the problem of increased drug use among teenagers.
· Thesis: Because immigrants have contributed much to the development of the United States, immigration quotas should be relaxed.
3. Analyzing your audience
Before writing any essay, you should analyze the characteristics, values, and interests of your audience. In argumentation, it is especially important to consider what beliefs or opinions your readers are likely to have and whether your audience is likely to be friendly, neutral, or hostile to your thesis.
4. Gather and document evidence-All the points you make in your paper must be supported. If they are not, your audience will dismiss them as unfounded, irrelevant, or unclear. Sometimes you can support a statement with appeals to emotion, but most of the time you support your argument’s points by appealing to reason — by providing evidence of facts and opinions in support of your position. Facts are statements that most people agree are true and that can be verified independently. Facts — including statistics — are the most commonly used type of evidence. It is a fact, for example, that fewer people per year were killed in U.S. automobile accidents in 2012 than in 1975. Facts may be drawn from your own experience as well as from reading and observation. Keep in mind that not all opinions are equally convincing. The opinions of experts are more convincing than are those of individuals who have limited knowledge of an issue. Your personal opinions can be excellent evidence (provided you are knowledgeable about your subject), but they are usually less convincing to your audience than an expert’s opinion. In the final analysis, what is important is not just the quality of the evidence but also the credibility of the person offering it. Your evidence should be relevant. It should support your thesis and be pertinent to your argument. Your evidence should be representative. It should represent the full range of opinions about your subject, not just one side. For example, in an essay arguing against the use of animals in medical experimentation, you would not just use information provided by animal rights activists. You would also use information supplied by medical researchers, pharmaceutical companies, and perhaps medical ethicists. Your evidence should be sufficient. It should include enough facts, opinions, and examples to support your claims. The amount of evidence you need depends on the length of your paper, your audience, and your thesis.
5. Documentation of Evidence. After you decide on a topic, you should begin to gather evidence. Sometimes you can use your own ideas and observations to support your claims. Most of the time, however, you will have to use the print and electronic resources of the library or search the Internet to locate the information you need. Documentation gives readers the ability to evaluate the sources you cite and to consult them if they wish. When you document sources, you establish credibility by showing readers that you are honest and have nothing to hide. Documentation also helps you avoid plagiarism — presenting the ideas or words of others as if they were your own.
6. Refutation- When gathering evidence, keep in mind that you should not ignore arguments against your position. In fact, you should always try to identify the most obvious — and even the not-so-obvious — objections to your position. By directly addressing these objections in your essay, you will help convince readers that your own position is valid. This part of an argument, called refutation, is essential to making the strongest case possible. You can refute opposing arguments by showing that they are unsound, unfair, or weak.
- Topic 1: Engaging Colleagues
- Human Resources 4 1/2 pg paper
- M3:A1
- "For The Think Tank"
- BUS 307 Week 3 DQ 2 ( Pros and Cons of Outsourcing ) - Tutorial Contains Two Answers For This Discussion - A Graded - Best Tutorial - Quality Work
- ANT 101 Week 2 DQ 1 Foraging Societies
- Survey Exam
- adobe indesign homework~~~
- I need help doing this paper.
- Any Takers - 2