help with engl due in 24 hours

Comparison/Contrast Essay

A Comparison and Contrast essay looks at the similarities and differences between two or more things. For this assignment, you will write an eight paragraph essay comparing and contrasting the two short stories “Finishing School” by Maya Angelou and “What’s in a Name?” by Henry Louis Gates, Jr. You must have three points to compare, so a three-point thesis will be required. Because this assignment is comparing and contrasting the two stories, no biographical information about the authors should be used; instead, focus on the similarities and differences between what happens in the stories themselves.

You may use research to help write this essay although it is not required. A Works Cited page must be included which will include the two stories and any research you may decide to use.

Because you are writing about literature, you will have to use quotes from the stories to help you make your points. In-text citations must indicate the necessary information. I will provide the page numbers for the stories so that you may cite correctly. Every body paragraph should include at least one quote from the story (not from the historical information) as evidence that supports the thesis.

On this essay, I will grade on usage of Comparison/Contrast structure as well as grammar and mechanics. The essay is worth one hundred points and will be due on ______________________ by 11:59 PM. Due to the timing of this assignment, no late work will be accepted.

Exemplification Essay

For your fourth essay, you will write an Exemplification essay based on one of the following topics. You must use a three-point thesis statement for this essay. As always, your essay must be double-spaced, written in Times New Roman 12 point font, and have an MLA heading. The essay must be at least two and a half to three pages long. The exemplification essay is worth one hundred points. The final draft of the essay will be due on ____________________.

Because an exemplification essay uses examples to prove its thesis, you will need to use research in your essay. I will require you to use at least two sources (either a book or a database article). You may NOT use an Internet source as your source. You must attach an MLA Works Cited page which coordinates with any in-text citations. Any essay received without an MLA Works Cited page will be docked ten points.

You may write on the following topics:

College

Suggestions: Is an online education as good as a traditional face-to-face education? Should the first two years of college be free? Should textbooks come with tuition?

Politics

Suggestions: Should there be political parties? Should Congress have term limits? Is the electoral college outdated? Is campaign finance reform necessary?

Social networking

Suggestions: Do social networking cites police themselves? Should social networking cites be held legally responsible if a crime occurs involving posts on their cite?

Health

Suggestions: Should alternative medical treatments be paid for by insurance? Should illegal aliens have the right to state funded hospitals? Should insurance companies be allowed to lobby Congress?

Film or Television

Suggestions: Should movie theaters follow stricter guidelines on audience attendance in “R” rated films? Should television be censored or penalized for questionable programming? Should Hollywood be held accountable for violence in films that produces copycat violence in society? What about video games?

You may NOT write on gay marriage, religion, abortion, legalization of marijuana, gun control, Obamacare, or euthanasia. **All topics must be approved by me.

F=Formatting:

1. Italics or quote mark error (titles)

2. Assignment requirements/length

3. Font incorrect (01)

4. Title does not meet criteria (O1)

5. Heading or header (page #) error

6. Margins or indentation error

7. Not all double-spaced

8. Formatting does not fulfill MLA requirements

P=Punctuation & spelling :

1. Comma error

2. Apostrophe error

3. Quotation mark error

4. Period error

5. Semicolon/ colon error

6. Capitalization error

7. Misspelled or should be spelled out

8. Excessive punctuation and/or spelling errors cause a problem with reading.

D=Diction/Style problems :

1. word choice is incorrect

2. Contraction used

3. 1st or 2nd person pronouns used

4. Verb tense (present only about lit)

5. Informal language/tone

6. Excessive diction/style errors cause a problem with understanding meaning.

G=Grammar :

1. Unnecessary words/awkward wording

2. Word missing or word order incorrect

3. Unclear pronoun reference

4. Verb form incorrect

5. Parallelism error

6. Preposition incorrect

7. Fragment, comma splice, or run-on

8. Subject-verb agreement error

9. choppy sentences

10. Dangling or misplaced modifier

11. Excessive grammar errors create a barrier to understanding the main idea.

O=Organization (org)

1. Guidelines/instructions not followed.

2. Paragraphs are too long or too short

3. Paragraph structure incorrect

4. Paragraphs not parallel

5. Not analysis/summarizes plot

6. Transition needed

7. Purpose of info unclear/Repetitious

8. Intro does not give background of thesis

9. Thesis statement unclear, vague, or missing

10. Thesis statement is obvious or too general

11. Location or format of thesis incorrect

12. Topic sentence does not connect to thesis and/or main idea of paragraph (TS)

13. Commentary is missing, unclear, or does not connect to Thesis

14. Concluding para. does not sum up the argument effectively or adds new evidence

15. Thesis/argument has not been proven because of paragraph structure and organizational errors.

C= Parenthetical Citations (in-text):

1. Required no. of citations per para. not met

2. Evidence not cited or cited incorrectly

3. MLA incorrect or citation not 09 MLA

4. Quote(s) incorrectly or not introduced

5. Quote(s) not relevant to the main idea

6. Long quote not blocked

W=Works Cited page:

1. WC page is missing

2. MLA page formatting problems

3. List not alphabetical

4. Authors name (s) incorrect

5. Source has info missing or out of order

6. Unacceptable source/ no. of sources unmet

7. Source MLA incorrect or not current

8. Names/titles do not match in-text citations

9. Citation errors prevent effective use of evidence and examples.

Name: _______________________________

A S atisfactory (C) paper:

· Meets the primary requirements of the assignment (length, etc.), including the topic, deadlines, format, and length

· Has an acceptable thesis statement in the intro paragraph that contains the author and/or title.

· Has basic body paragraph organization, with citations if required and a final concluding paragraph.

· MLA formatting may need some improvement, but in-text citations and sources from the alphabetical list on the Works Cited page correlate and are appropriate.

· Student has not used first person (“I”) or second person (“you”) in the essay.  

· Paper may have some grammar, spelling, and sentence structure errors that do not interfere significantly with readability and understanding.

An Above Average (B) paper:

· Meets the above requirements, with paragraphs that consistently refer to the main idea of the Thesis Statement (which is also correctly placed as the last sentence of the intro paragraph) and have good transitions. Diction and vocabulary are mature and collegiate.

· Sentences and paragraph structure are well-developed, organized and parallel. Topic Sentences and Commentary in each paragraph reflect the main point of the paragraph's relevance to the thesis/argument.

· The Introduction and Conclusion effectively introduce and summarize the argument. The student’s title contains the literary title.

· The primary and secondary sources, if required, are cited in each of the body paragraphs as examples and evidence to support the thesis/argument.

· Quotes are relevant to the argument and are from scholarly, academic journals (where secondary sources are required).

· Critical thinking and analysis is evident and literary terms are used to convey the main ideas.

· Most MLA formatting is correct, but there may be minor errors. There may be enough minor errors to prevent the paper from being “Excellent.” A major error in any area can also prevent the “Above Average” grade. A “B” will have at least one more than the minimum required no. of sources or page numbers. (In the case of the Literary Essay, it must be to the bottom of p.3.)

An Excellent (A) paper, in addition to the above criteria for a “B,” has excellent transitions that connect the evidence to form a mature, collegiate-level argument that is based upon literary analysis and uses literary terminology. It will be imaginative and have fresh insights. “A” papers will have at least one more of each sources and page numbers than the minimum required.

[The number and degree of errors determines whether the letter grade is high (+) or low (-).]

Kevineshia Jefferson

Instructor Cobbs

ENGL - 101

02 March 2024

Online Education VS Traditional Face-to-Face Education

The fastest-growing market in the education industry is online learning. A significant number of students now prefer online learning to traditional face-to-face learning. Technological advancements have hastened the adoption of online learning. Collaborative platforms and mobile educational apps have facilitated online learning. Online learning has enabled students to learn whenever and wherever they want. Online education is as good as traditional face-to-face education because it provides quality education, engagement and feedback, and networking opportunities. Comment by Shelby Hartley: + The use of specific examples such as Google, IBM, Amazon, and Microsoft recognizing online certifications effectively supports the argument about the credibility of online education (Paragraph 3). Comment by Shelby Hartley: +Excellent choice of reputable companies to illustrate the recognition of online certifications, bolstering the credibility of the argument. Comment by Shelby Hartley: +Concrete examples of commonly used platforms enhance the clarity and understanding of how online engagement is facilitated. The description of networking opportunities, including joining professional organizations, attending webinars, and accessing alumni networks, provides a comprehensive view of the networking possibilities in online education (Paragraph 8). Comment by Shelby Hartley: -While the paper adequately discusses the benefits of online education, it could benefit from addressing potential drawbacks or limitations of online learning compared to traditional face-to-face education. Adding a section that acknowledges and addresses common criticisms of online education would provide a more balanced perspective. Comment by Shelby Hartley: -Some paragraphs lack depth in analysis and rely heavily on summarizing information. Incorporating critical analysis and discussing potential counterarguments would strengthen the paper's argumentation. Comment by Shelby Hartley: -The conclusion could be expanded to provide a more comprehensive summary of the key points discussed in the paper and their broader implications for education. Additionally, tying the conclusion back to the introduction would provide a sense of closure and cohesion.

Students acquire quality education through online education. The instructional methods, curriculum, and content can be altered to meet student’s learning objectives and educational standards. Online learning enables students to achieve quality education by providing discussion forums and multimedia resources. Examples of multimedia resources in online learning platforms include simulations, animations, and videos. Students often collaborate, share insights, and ask questions in the discussion forums. They simulate various experiments in virtual laboratories. Online learning provides quality education by allowing students to decide when to attend virtual laboratories and participate in discussion forums (Chang et al. 1281). Students attending traditional face-to-face education also participate in discussions and do experiments in laboratories. The quality of education in both online and traditional face-to-face education is the same because similar resources and learning opportunities are provided to students.

Online education provides quality education by offering academic support to students. For example, students receive academic advising, counseling, and tutoring through online learning. Most school websites now include sections whereby students can access tutoring services. Students have access to support groups and counseling services. University websites provide information on crisis intervention and scheduling appointments (Chang et al. 1282). Students’ learning experience is enhanced when they are provided with support services. The support services provided in traditional face-to-face education are available in online learning.

The quality of education in online education is high because employers recognize the qualifications and certifications earned through various online learning platforms. For example, companies such as Google, IBM, Amazon, and Microsoft recognize online certifications. Google recognizes the credentials and certifications earned through platforms such as Udacity and Coursera (Manegre et al. 974). The recognition of online learning certifications by numerous companies indicates that online learning is as good as traditional face-to-face learning.

Learners have access to continuous education opportunities in both online education and traditional face-to-face education. Students can achieve professional development and continuous learning in both online and traditional education. For example, students can enroll in various courses to acquire more skills and education (Müller et al. 54). A significant number of students further their education through online learning. They choose online learning because it does not require them to travel in order to attend classes.

Students learning through either online education or traditional face-to-face education are engaged actively. Online learning uses collaborative platforms and tools to engage students. For example, collaboration on projects and documents is facilitated through Google Workspace. Instructors use platforms such as Webex and Zoom to facilitate live classes (Chang et al. 1284). Multimedia elements such as visual diagrams and video lectures are used to increase student engagement. Online education platforms have chat features that enhance engagement and collaboration.

Students can receive immediate feedback in online education and traditional face-to-face education. Examples of ways in which students receive immediate feedback when they take online classes include online quizzes, auto-graded assignments, live virtual sessions, and interactive exercises (Woldeab et al. 12). Online platforms include interactive assessments and quizzes that provide immediate feedback. Assignments submitted by students electronically are auto-graded. Students receive immediate feedback as they get to know the questions they got wrong after submitting their assignments.

Online education provides networking opportunities just like traditional face-to-face education. Those who take online learning classes can join professional organizations or associations. They can attend virtual industry-specific forums and join alumni networks. University websites have pages or sections dedicated to alumni engagement, resources and relations. Students can fill out online registration or membership forms. They can submit these forms online and create profiles. Alumni networks allow members to access mentorship programs, job boards, and networking events (Müller et al. 101). Those taking traditional face-to-face education can network by attending traditional conferences while those taking online learning network by attending webinars and virtual conferences.

Online education is as good as traditional face-to-face education due to the quality of education and access to networking opportunities. Students can receive support services in both learning methods. Organizations recognize degrees earned through both online learning and traditional face-to-face education. Students are likely to prefer online learning because it is cheaper and more flexible than traditional face-to-face education.

Works Cited

Chang, Julia Yu-Fong, et al. "Comparison of learning effectiveness between physical classroom and online learning for dental education during the COVID-19 pandemic."  Journal of dental sciences 16.4 (2021): 1281-1289.

Manegre, Marni, and Kashif Ali Sabiri. "Online language learning using virtual classrooms: An analysis of teacher perceptions."  Computer Assisted Language Learning 35.5-6 (2022): 973-988.

Müller, Claude, and Thoralf Mildenberger. "Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education."  Educational Research Review 34 (2021): 100394.

Woldeab, Daniel, Robert M. Yawson, and Emmanuel Osafo. "A systematic meta-analytic review of thinking beyond the comparison of online versus traditional learning."  E-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching 14.1 (2020): 1-24.

Revision Questions

Shelby Hartley

Is the paper long enough?

The paper is currently two pages long. While it covers the main points adequately, expanding on some sections and providing more examples could enrich the content. Suggestions for lengthening the paper include delving deeper into the comparison between online and traditional education in terms of student engagement, instructor effectiveness, and impact on learning outcomes.

Does the title grab your attention?

The title is straightforward but lacks intrigue. A suggestion for a more captivating title could be: "Navigating the Education Frontier: Unveiling the Pros and Cons of Online versus Traditional Learning."

Is there a hook?

There is a hook discussing the rise of online education, but it could be strengthened by including a thought-provoking statistic or anecdote about the current landscape of education. For instance, a startling statistic about the exponential growth of online learners in recent years could enhance the hook.

Is there an effective bridge?

The transition from the introduction to the body paragraphs could be smoother. Incorporating a sentence that explicitly introduces the main points to be discussed in the subsequent paragraphs would improve the flow.

The body paragraphs follow the TEAL structure, providing evidence, analysis, and a clear link to the thesis. However, some paragraphs could benefit from deeper analysis and more varied examples to strengthen the arguments.

Are all citations done correctly?

Citations are properly formatted according to the given citation style. There is a Works Cited page, and the entries match the in-text citations.

One Thing Liked Most:

The comprehensive exploration of the similarities between online and traditional education, supported by specific examples and citations, is commendable. The paper effectively argues for the equivalence of online education in terms of quality, engagement, and networking opportunities, providing valuable insights into the evolving landscape of education.