help with 106 assgn due in 48 hours

profilecombs
Home>Homework Answsers>English homework help
essyAssignment

attached

  • 2 years ago
  • 18
Report issue
files (1)

moduleassessment.docx

13.5: Module Assessment

Directions:

Your assignment for week 3 has two components:

Component 1: Before Class(11/19)

To complete component 1 of this assignment, you must complete the following sections of your  Learning LogLinks to an external site.:

· The comprehension questions for your readings in Parts 1-3 of the Learning Log

· The 'Clarifying Questions' exercise in Part 5 of the Learning Log

· The Summative Assessment prep in Part 6 of the Learning Log

· The Glossary exercise at the bottom of the Learning Log.

Component 2: After Class- Due 11/21

To complete component 2 of this assignment, you must complete the following sections of your Learning Log:

· The Tutorial Essay in Part 4 of the Learning Log

· Write 400-500 words in response to our essential question for this week:  “What is the link between questioning and understanding?”

· You will find full instructions and a list of guided talking points to support your writing.

· WC 106 Module 3(Week 13) Essay Information ResourceLinks to an external site.

Submission Details:

Make a copy of the Learning Log for week two.

Fill in the Learning Log based on all of the resources that you read/studied for the module.

Complete your tutorial essay response

Copy and paste the URL/ web link to your Learning Log on the Canvas page and hit submit!

Grading

· The rubric below offers success criteria for how your Learning Log responses will be graded.

· IMPORTANT: Make sure that the access permissions of the file are set to ‘Anyone with the link can view’. This is extremely important because if your professor is not able to access your responses then they cannot give you a grade.

· IMPORTANT: All responses must be your own work. Any detection of AI or plagiarism, whether intentional or unintentional, will result in a 0 for this assignment.

Rubric

Tutorial Response Submission Criteria (1)

Tutorial Response Submission Criteria (1)

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDepth of understanding

To extent to which the candidate engages in a deeper exploration of the topic and material.

5 pts

Exceeds expectations

The candidate demonstrates an understanding of the main concepts, arguments, and theories presented in the question by summarizing and paraphrasing several of the tutorial question's key ideas in their own words, alongside drawing on verbatim quotes from sources where necessary.

4 pts

Meets expectations

The candidate demonstrates an understanding of the main concepts, arguments, and theories presented in the question by summarizing and paraphrasing at least 2 of the tutorial question's key ideas in their own words, alongside drawing on verbatim quotes from sources where necessary.

3 pts

Approaches expectations

The candidate demonstrates an understanding of the main concepts, arguments, and theories presented in the question by summarizing and paraphrasing one key idea from the tutorial question in their own words.

2 pts

Does not meet expectations

The candidate submits a response that references key concepts and theories by name only.

1 pts

Incomplete

The candidate does not refer to any readings or key concepts in their response.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBreadth of knowledge

The extent to which the candidate draws on a range of knowledge sources when responding to the question.

5 pts

Exceeds expectations

When substantiating an argument, the candidate uses quotes from course readings and relevant sources from their own research, alongside reflections from lived experience and those of fellow candidates.

4 pts

Meets expectations

When substantiating an argument, the candidate uses quotes from course readings alongside reflections from lived experience to back up their commentary on key concepts in their writing.

3 pts

Approaches expectations

When substantiating an argument, the candidate uses reflections from lived experience to provide commentary on key concepts in their writing.

2 pts

Does not meet expectations

The candidate makes assertions and poses arguments in their response to the tutorial question.

1 pts

Incomplete

The candidate's response is based entirely on anecdotes.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCoherence of Argument

The extent to which the candidate can generate original insights, questions, or contributions related to the topic and question.

5 pts

Exceeds expectations

The candidate’s response connects directly to the tutorial question and has a ‘thesis statement’. There is a clear introduction and conclusion to the response. The candidate explains the links between the tutorial question and the references/experiences that the candidate chooses to draw on in their writing in a way that provides original insights on the tutorial question and that helps the reader to see the tutorial question in a new way.

4 pts

Meets expectations

The candidate’s response connects directly to the tutorial question and has a ‘thesis statement’. There is a clear introduction and conclusion to the response. The candidate explains the links between the tutorial question and the references/experiences that the candidate chooses to draw on in their writing.

3 pts

Approaches expectations

There is a clear introduction and conclusion to the candidate's response. The candidate makes a link between the tutorial question a reading/ experience that they choose to reference in their writing.

2 pts

Does not meet expectations

There is a clear introduction and conclusion to the candidate's response.

1 pts

Incomplete

The candidate's response has no discernible structure.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Grammar

To extent to which the candidate pays attention to grammatical norms.

5 pts

Exceeds expectations

The candidate's grammar use is consistently correct, and word choice enhances the effectiveness of the writing.

4 pts

Meets expectations

The candidate's response is generally free of grammar/usage errors.

3 pts

Approaches expectations

The candidate makes several grammatical errors in their response.

2 pts

Does not meet expectations

The candidate makes several serious errors in language, grammar, usage, and/or mechanics that detract from the overall clarity of the essay.

1 pts

Incomplete

The candidate's response has serious writing errors that detract from understanding the ideas or is not coherent.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Citation

To extent to which the candidate pays attention to referencing norms.

5 pts

Exceeds expectations

All works are cited correctly.

4 pts

Meets expectations

The candidate's use of citations is mostly correct.

3 pts

Approaches expectations

The candidate make a citation for every work referenced, with some minor errors.

2 pts

Does not meet expectations

The candidate makes citations inconsistently and/or their citations contain serious errors, making it difficult to know to whom the work cited belongs to.

1 pts

Incomplete

The candidate does not include any citations when referring to reading materials and research sources.

5 pts

Total Points: 25