Health assessment

sent1.docx

Sentinel Events Literature Review

Assignment: Complete a literature review about a Sentinel Event.

First, reflect on a sentinel event that you know of personally, professionally, or have heard about in the media. Then, locate two research articles about preventing such an event. Lastly, critique the two articles. Follow the directions and grading criteria. **Reminder: Do not discuss any privileged information in this assignment (HIPAA, FERPA, etc.).

Links to an external site.

A literature review is an objective, critical summary of published research literature relevant to a

topic under consideration for research. Its purpose is to create familiarity with current thinking and research on

a particular topic and may justify future research into a previously overlooked or understudied area.

****A literature review is more than just a summary of each article. It involves critically appraising the two articles and finding common themes, topics, etc. about the sentinel event. As you find those common themes among the two articles, then discuss those in the literature review. ****

Here's a quick overview of how to identify research articles:

A scholarly, research article is written by the scientist(s) who actually did the research WITHIN the last five years (unless it was a historic study). If a resource is greater than 5 years from publication, a discussion with faculty is necessary.

The article follows a specific format

abstract

introduction

materials & methods

results

conclusions

references

A systematic review searches for the answer to a particular question in the existing scientific literature on a topic.

A meta-analysis compares and combines the findings of previously published studies, usually to assess the effectiveness of an intervention or mode of treatment.

Below are links to an article and PowerPoint from 2021 discussing Sentinel Events.

Select one Sentinel Event that has occurred in the last five years and locate two scholarly journal articles related to this type of event. Submit a literature review paper in APA format (see article "How to Write a Literature Review Paper" Preview the document Download "How to Write a Literature Review Paper") and submit a PDF copy of both scholarly articles that were used for this review, along with your paper under the submission link. Please review the grading rubric for specific requirements.

NOTE***This is not a paper regarding a sentinel event. This is a paper critically appraising the research articles you chose about the type of sentinel event. Discuss the research articles, not the event.

sent1.docx

Make up an event that happen –

Sentinel Events Literature Review

Assignment: Complete a literature review about a Sentinel Event.

First, reflect on a sentinel event that you know of personally, professionally, or have heard about in the media. Then, locate two research articles about preventing such an event. Lastly, critique the two articles. Follow the directions and grading criteria. **Reminder: Do not discuss any privileged information in this assignment (HIPAA, FERPA, etc.).

Links to an external site.

A literature review is an objective, critical summary of published research literature relevant to a

topic under consideration for research. Its purpose is to create familiarity with current thinking and research on

a particular topic and may justify future research into a previously overlooked or understudied area.

****A literature review is more than just a summary of each article. It involves critically appraising the two articles and finding common themes, topics, etc. about the sentinel event. As you find those common themes among the two articles, then discuss those in the literature review. ****

Here's a quick overview of how to identify research articles:

A scholarly, research article is written by the scientist(s) who actually did the research WITHIN the last five years (unless it was a historic study). If a resource is greater than 5 years from publication, a discussion with faculty is necessary.

The article follows a specific format

abstract

introduction

materials & methods

results

conclusions

references

A systematic review searches for the answer to a particular question in the existing scientific literature on a topic.

A meta-analysis compares and combines the findings of previously published studies, usually to assess the effectiveness of an intervention or mode of treatment.

Below are links to an article and PowerPoint from 2021 discussing Sentinel Events.

Select one Sentinel Event that has occurred in the last five years and locate two scholarly journal articles related to this type of event. Submit a literature review paper in APA format (see article "How to Write a Literature Review Paper" Preview the document Download "How to Write a Literature Review Paper") and submit a PDF copy of both scholarly articles that were used for this review, along with your paper under the submission link. Please review the grading rubric for specific requirements.

NOTE***This is not a paper regarding a sentinel event. This is a paper critically appraising the research articles you chose about the type of sentinel event. Discuss the research articles, not the event.

Points (100)
2.5	JSU title page	Title page meets requirements per APA guidelines for scholarly writing.
15	Introduction	The introductory paragraph serves the purpose to introduce the purpose of the paper and the topic that will be discussed. A concise definition of a topic under consideration (this may be a descriptive or argumentative thesis, or proposal), as well as the scope of the related literature being investigated. State the general findings of the review (what do most of the sources conclude), and comment on the availability of sources in the subject area.
25	Body Paragraphs	There are many ways to organize the evaluation of the sources. Chronological and thematic approaches are each useful example. For the purpose of scholarly writing, you should have clear topics or themes being discussed in each paragraph of the paper. Therefore, you should have at least two body paragraphs, one for each article. Each work should be critically summarized and evaluated for its premise, methodology, and conclusion. It is as important to address inconsistencies, omissions, and errors, as it is to identify accuracy, depth, and relevance. Use logical connections and transitions to connect sources.
20	Conclusion	Reflect critical thinking of your findings. The conclusion summarizes the key findings of the review in general terms. Note commonalities between works. This section is the reviewer’s opportunity to justify a research proposal. Therefore, the idea should be clearly re-stated and supported according to the findings of the review.
7.5	Reference page	References are required for this project and should be noted utilizing APA format. Please review the APA textbook for proper formatting of the Reference page. *Points will be deducted if references are published greater than 5 years.
10	Supporting Articles	Submit a PDF copy of both scholarly articles that were used for this review, along with your paper. Please note the articles must be considered scholarly and reliable. To be considered reliable, the date of the article must be within a 5 year time frame.
20	APA	Sentence structure and grammar are consistent with scholarly writing guidelines.
Submit your document to TurnItIn for plagiarism review.

Points (100)
2.5	JSU title page	Title page meets requirements per APA guidelines for scholarly writing.
15	Introduction	The introductory paragraph serves the purpose to introduce the purpose of the paper and the topic that will be discussed. A concise definition of a topic under consideration (this may be a descriptive or argumentative thesis, or proposal), as well as the scope of the related literature being investigated. State the general findings of the review (what do most of the sources conclude), and comment on the availability of sources in the subject area.
25	Body Paragraphs	There are many ways to organize the evaluation of the sources. Chronological and thematic approaches are each useful example. For the purpose of scholarly writing, you should have clear topics or themes being discussed in each paragraph of the paper. Therefore, you should have at least two body paragraphs, one for each article. Each work should be critically summarized and evaluated for its premise, methodology, and conclusion. It is as important to address inconsistencies, omissions, and errors, as it is to identify accuracy, depth, and relevance. Use logical connections and transitions to connect sources.
20	Conclusion	Reflect critical thinking of your findings. The conclusion summarizes the key findings of the review in general terms. Note commonalities between works. This section is the reviewer’s opportunity to justify a research proposal. Therefore, the idea should be clearly re-stated and supported according to the findings of the review.
7.5	Reference page	References are required for this project and should be noted utilizing APA format. Please review the APA textbook for proper formatting of the Reference page. *Points will be deducted if references are published greater than 5 years.
10	Supporting Articles	Submit a PDF copy of both scholarly articles that were used for this review, along with your paper. Please note the articles must be considered scholarly and reliable. To be considered reliable, the date of the article must be within a 5 year time frame.
20	APA	Sentence structure and grammar are consistent with scholarly writing guidelines.
Submit your document to TurnItIn for plagiarism review.

Points (100)
2.5	JSU title page	Title page meets requirements per APA guidelines for scholarly writing.
15	Introduction	The introductory paragraph serves the purpose to introduce the purpose of the paper and the topic that will be discussed. A concise definition of a topic under consideration (this may be a descriptive or argumentative thesis, or proposal), as well as the scope of the related literature being investigated. State the general findings of the review (what do most of the sources conclude), and comment on the availability of sources in the subject area.
25	Body Paragraphs	There are many ways to organize the evaluation of the sources. Chronological and thematic approaches are each useful example. For the purpose of scholarly writing, you should have clear topics or themes being discussed in each paragraph of the paper. Therefore, you should have at least two body paragraphs, one for each article. Each work should be critically summarized and evaluated for its premise, methodology, and conclusion. It is as important to address inconsistencies, omissions, and errors, as it is to identify accuracy, depth, and relevance. Use logical connections and transitions to connect sources.
20	Conclusion	Reflect critical thinking of your findings. The conclusion summarizes the key findings of the review in general terms. Note commonalities between works. This section is the reviewer’s opportunity to justify a research proposal. Therefore, the idea should be clearly re-stated and supported according to the findings of the review.
7.5	Reference page	References are required for this project and should be noted utilizing APA format. Please review the APA textbook for proper formatting of the Reference page. *Points will be deducted if references are published greater than 5 years.
10	Supporting Articles	Submit a PDF copy of both scholarly articles that were used for this review, along with your paper. Please note the articles must be considered scholarly and reliable. To be considered reliable, the date of the article must be within a 5 year time frame.
20	APA	Sentence structure and grammar are consistent with scholarly writing guidelines.
Submit your document to TurnItIn for plagiarism review.

Points (100)
2.5	JSU title page	Title page meets requirements per APA guidelines for scholarly writing.
15	Introduction	The introductory paragraph serves the purpose to introduce the purpose of the paper and the topic that will be discussed. A concise definition of a topic under consideration (this may be a descriptive or argumentative thesis, or proposal), as well as the scope of the related literature being investigated. State the general findings of the review (what do most of the sources conclude), and comment on the availability of sources in the subject area.
25	Body Paragraphs	There are many ways to organize the evaluation of the sources. Chronological and thematic approaches are each useful example. For the purpose of scholarly writing, you should have clear topics or themes being discussed in each paragraph of the paper. Therefore, you should have at least two body paragraphs, one for each article. Each work should be critically summarized and evaluated for its premise, methodology, and conclusion. It is as important to address inconsistencies, omissions, and errors, as it is to identify accuracy, depth, and relevance. Use logical connections and transitions to connect sources.
20	Conclusion	Reflect critical thinking of your findings. The conclusion summarizes the key findings of the review in general terms. Note commonalities between works. This section is the reviewer’s opportunity to justify a research proposal. Therefore, the idea should be clearly re-stated and supported according to the findings of the review.
7.5	Reference page	References are required for this project and should be noted utilizing APA format. Please review the APA textbook for proper formatting of the Reference page. *Points will be deducted if references are published greater than 5 years.
10	Supporting Articles	Submit a PDF copy of both scholarly articles that were used for this review, along with your paper. Please note the articles must be considered scholarly and reliable. To be considered reliable, the date of the article must be within a 5 year time frame.
20	APA	Sentence structure and grammar are consistent with scholarly writing guidelines.
Submit your document to TurnItIn for plagiarism review.

sent1.docx

SentinealEventLiteratureReviewGradingRubric-.docx

sent1.docx

SentinealEventLiteratureReviewGradingRubric-.docx

NU 350 Professional Roles

Sentinel Event Literature Review Grading Rubric

SentinealEventLiteratureReviewGradingRubric-.docx

NU 350 Professional Roles

Sentinel Event Literature Review Grading Rubric

sent1.docx

SentinealEventLiteratureReviewGradingRubric-.docx

NU 350 Professional Roles

Sentinel Event Literature Review Grading Rubric

sent1.docx

SentinealEventLiteratureReviewGradingRubric-.docx

NU 350 Professional Roles

Sentinel Event Literature Review Grading Rubric