fix essay9
Maozedong- 1. Need a clear thesis that specifies what your analysis of the rhetorical elements in both articles are. You must be specific—show me what you believe makes one article more engaging than the other or not.
- 2.Need see a very specific claim in each paragraph that focuses on all the points you cover in the paragraph. I also need you to introduce yourself in that claim. Furthermore, I need to see a very clear structure of Claim—Evidence—Explanation of Evidence.
- Regarding the macrostructure, the organization of the paper is not efficient. You lump together the information about the articles and do not make a clear point about how they compare in a claim. You must use separate paragraphs for each article with the idea that you are comparing them in the claim.
- 3.This paper relies mostly on summary and not on the analysis of the rhetorical elements.
- 4.In text-citation and WC page are absent.
- 5.Need more explanation of evidence so that you can explore how the rhetorical elements engage or disengage the audience.
8 years ago
30
Answer(1)![blurred-text]()
Purchase the answer to view it
NOT RATED
RevisedVersion.docx
other Questions(10)
- Financial Statements
- Market Analysis Paper
- geniusy_2006
- Part2: Course Project
- FOR GOOGLESCHOLAR APol1-2
- Write an essay consisting of at least 500 words addressing all of the following topics (a through h):
- Practice-Based Statement of Cash Flows Learning Experience
- Assignment for Kim
- 4
- Avoiding group thinking online search to find more details of the techniques/models and 4. Describe the concepts of how it works and what kinds of problems can be solved with it.
