Financial Planning Software NaviPlan
3 years ago
20
AbigailandTedSayersUniqueCase.docx
SayersAssetAllocationQuestionnaire.pdf
- Assignment2Part1SayersCaseInstructionsandRubric.docx
AbigailandTedSayersUniqueCase.docx
Abigail and Ted Sayers
Ted and Abigail Sayers have been common law partners for ten years. They came to Canada from the United States on March 1, 2007 when Abigail was offered a job with the Canadian diplomatic service. They have one son, George. The family lives at 6547 Aston Martin Mews in Mississauga, Ontario L5N 7P6.
The family’s birthdates are:
Ted, April 20, 1977
Abigail: June 15, 1977
George: October 30, 2016
Ted and Abigail have provided their most recent Notice of Assessments to you that show that Ted has $23,000 in RRSP carryforward room, while Abigail has $5,000 in RRSP carryforward room. Ted has TFSA carryforward room in the amount of $73,000, while Abigail has $88,000 in TFSA carryforward.
The couple have three goals:
First, they would like to retire at age 60. They would like to continue living the same lifestyle as they are now. They would also like to have an extra $14532 (in today’s dollars) each year for travel.
Second, the couple would like to fund 100% of George’s four-year post-secondary education. The total cost of the education is expected to be $17681 (in today’s dollars) per year and education costs are expected to continue rising at an annual pace of 5%. George is expected to begin his education when he turns 17.
Third, the couple would like to accumulate $100,000 in today’s dollars to start a scholarship fund for students who want to spend a summer abroad for cultural studies. Given Abigail’s connections with the diplomatic corps in various countries, she believes that she can raise additional funds to facilitate a student exchange. The couple intend to spend launch the fund in their retirement, but would like to accumulate the funds by the time they are 55 so that they can raise matching contributions from donors.
Ted earns a gross annual salary of $148329 as the CFO for Amazing Software Co. and generally gets cost of living adjustments each year to keep up with inflation. He gets paid biweekly. Abigail earns $126586 per year, also indexed to inflation. She receives her pay bi-weekly.
The couple currently have $25,000 in a joint chequing account. This account earns no interest. They also have joint savings account with a $50,000 balance that earns 1% interest and is earmarked for emergencies.
The couple lease a car worth $45,000 and pay $500 per month for the car. They prefer to lease rather than buy cars because they appreciate that the car is always under warranty.
Ted has a TFSA that the couple uses to save money for George’s education. It currently has $15,000 in cash in it. They contribute $200 per month to it and earn 2% interest.
Ted has a group RRSP to which he contributes 6% of his salary to each year, through payroll deductions. His company will match 100% of his contribution to a maximum of 9% of his salary. Ted’s group RRSP has $150,000 currently invested at 4% in balanced fund.
Please note that there is some missing information in the Sayers case that I have added in bold.
Abigail joined her pension plan on January 2, 2008. She will be eligible to receive an unreduced, non-indexed pension when the sum of her age and years of service equal 85. The normal retirement age is 65. Her pension benefit accrues at 1.5% of her income up to the YMPE plus 1.8% above the YMPE to a maximum of 50% of the last five years of her salary. For every year that the pension is taken early, there is a 5% penalty. Abigail contributes $10,000 per year to her pension. Ted will assume 60% of the pension in the event of Abigail's premature death.
The couple own their home jointly, which is currently valued at $1.2 million. Their only debt is their mortgage. They bought their house for $850,000 in November 2010 using a $450,000 mortgage. Their current five-year mortgage rate of 3.50% is fixed until September 2024, at which time they will choose a new term and rate when they renew their mortgage contract. They currently owe $350,000 on their mortgage and pay monthly payments of $2,500.
The couple have the following expenses each month:
· Housing costs, including utilities of $1,400.
· Food and housing supplies of $1,000.
· Transportation expenses of $1,500.
· CableTV, internet, and cell phones of $500.
· Extra-curricular activities for George of $500 (payable to June 30, 2034).
· Social and Entertainment expenses of $1,000
· Car lease $500
The couple also have the following expenses each year:
· Property taxes of $8,000
· Travel expenses of $10,000
Each partner has a will that designates the other as the executor and sole beneficiary of all assets, except for $100,000, indexed for inflation, that will fund a trust for the care of George in the event that the couple pass while George is a minor. Their wills also appoint Abigail’s sister as the guardian for George and the trustee of the trust. Their wills were last updated when George was born.
The couple’s answers to their investment questionnaire are posted separately. They expect to pay a 2% non-tax deductible annual fee for money management.
SayersAssetAllocationQuestionnaire.pdf
Important: The calculations or other information generated by NaviPlan® version 23.8 regarding the likelihood of various investment
outcomes are hypothetical in nature, do not reflect actual investment results, and are not guarantees of future results. These calculations are shown for illustrative purposes only because they utilize return data that may not include fees or operating expenses, and are not
available for investment. If included, fees and other operating expenses would materially reduce these calculations.
1
Questionnaire Results
Sayers
Different investors have different risk tolerances. Much of the difference stems from time horizon. That is, someone with a short investment time horizon is less able to withstand losses. The remainder of the difference is attributable to the individual’s appetite for risk. Volatility can be nerve-wracking for many people, and they are more comfortable when they can avoid it. However, there is a relationship between risk and return. Investors need to recognize this risk/return trade-off. The following risk tolerance questionnaire is designed to measure an individual’s ability (time horizon) and willingness (risk tolerance) to accept uncertainties in their investment’s performance. The total score recommends which of five distinct risk profiles is most appropriate for the investor.
Investment History (not scored)
1. What is your experience and overall knowledge of investments?
I have no investment experience and a very low knowledge level regarding investments.
I have very little investment experience and a fairly low knowledge level.
I have some experience investing in mutual funds and am somewhat knowledgeable.
I have some experience investing in mutual funds, individual stocks and bonds and am somewhat knowledgeable.
I am an experienced investor and have a solid knowledge base regarding investments and am aware that markets can be volatile and unpredictable.
Time Horizon
2. When do you expect to begin withdrawing money from your investment account?
Less than 2 years
2 years
3 to 4 years
5 to 7 years
8 to 10 years
11 years or more
3. Once you begin withdrawing money from your investment account, how long do you expect the withdrawals to last?
I plan to take a lump sum distribution
1 to 4 years
5 to 7 years
8 to 10 years
11 years or more
Important: The calculations or other information generated by NaviPlan® version 23.8 regarding the likelihood of various investment
outcomes are hypothetical in nature, do not reflect actual investment results, and are not guarantees of future results. These calculations are shown for illustrative purposes only because they utilize return data that may not include fees or operating expenses, and are not
available for investment. If included, fees and other operating expenses would materially reduce these calculations.
2
Risk Tolerance
4. Inflation, the rise in prices over time, can erode your investment return. Long-term investors should be aware that, if portfolio returns are less than the inflation rate, their ability to purchase goods and services in the future might actually decline. However, portfolios with long-term returns that significantly exceed inflation are associated with a higher degree of risk. Which of the following choices best reflects your attitude toward inflation and risk?
My main goal is to avoid loss, even though I may only keep pace with inflation.
My main goal is to earn slightly more than inflation, while taking on a low level of risk.
My main goal is to increase my portfolio’s value. Therefore, I am willing to accept short-term losses, but I am not comfortable with extreme performance shifts that may be experienced in the most aggressive investment options.
My main goal is to maximize my portfolio value, and I am willing to take on more extreme levels of risk and performance shifts in my portfolio to do so.
5. The table below presents a hypothetical worst case loss, expected gain, and best case gain of five sample portfolios over a one-year period with an initial $100,000 investment. Which portfolio would you prefer to hold?
Hypothetical Best Base ($)
Expected Gain ($)
Hypothetical Worst Case ($)
Portfolio 1 116,500 105,300 89,500
Portfolio 2 122,200 106,400 83,500
Portfolio 3 128,800 107,400 76,200
Portfolio 4 135,900 108,400 68,200
Portfolio 5 141,400 109,200 62,300
6. Investing involves a trade-off between risk and return. Historically, investors who have received high long-term average returns have experienced greater fluctuations in the value of their portfolio and more frequent short-term losses than investors in more conservative investments have. Considering the above, which statement best describes your investment goals?
Protect the value of my account. In order to minimize the chance for loss, I am willing to accept the lower long-term returns provided by conservative investments.
Keep risk to a minimum while trying to achieve slightly higher returns than the returns provided by investments that are more conservative.
Focus more on the long-term investment returns. Long-Term growth is equally as important as managing portfolio risk.
Maximize long-term investment returns. I am willing to accept large and sometimes dramatic short-term fluctuations in the value of my investments.
7. Historically, markets have experienced downturns, both short-term and prolonged, followed by
Important: The calculations or other information generated by NaviPlan® version 23.8 regarding the likelihood of various investment
outcomes are hypothetical in nature, do not reflect actual investment results, and are not guarantees of future results. These calculations are shown for illustrative purposes only because they utilize return data that may not include fees or operating expenses, and are not
available for investment. If included, fees and other operating expenses would materially reduce these calculations.
3
market recoveries. Suppose you owned a well-diversified portfolio that fell by 20% (i.e. $1,000 initial investment would now be worth $800) over a short period, consistent with the overall market. Assuming you still have 10 years until you begin withdrawals, how would you react?
I would not change my portfolio.
I would wait at least one year before changing to options that are more conservative.
I would wait at least three months before changing to options that are more conservative.
I would immediately change to options that are more conservative.
8. The following graph shows the hypothetical best and worst results of five sample portfolios over a one-year holding period. The best potential and worst potential gains and losses are presented. Note that the portfolio with the highest upside also has the largest downside. Which of these portfolios would you prefer to hold?
Portfolio A
Portfolio B
Portfolio C
Portfolio D
Portfolio E
9. I am comfortable with investments that may frequently experience large declines in value if there is a potential for higher returns. What is your view regarding this statement?
Important: The calculations or other information generated by NaviPlan® version 23.8 regarding the likelihood of various investment
outcomes are hypothetical in nature, do not reflect actual investment results, and are not guarantees of future results. These calculations are shown for illustrative purposes only because they utilize return data that may not include fees or operating expenses, and are not
available for investment. If included, fees and other operating expenses would materially reduce these calculations.
4
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Somewhat agree
Agree
Strongly agree
© 2023 Morningstar Investment Management LLC. All rights reserved. Morningstar is a registered investment advisor that develops proprietary asset allocation tools used for educational purposes only. Morningstar has granted InvestCloud, Inc. and Advicent Solutions, LP. a license to use these asset allocation tools. Morningstar is not affiliated with InvestCloud or Advicent Solutions.
- Siéntense en la cama. No se sienten en la camaincorrect No lo limpie ahora. LÃmpielo ahoraincorrect Lávenmelas mañana. No me las laven mañanaincorrect No nos los...
- i have health project
- Accounting assignment
- Real analysis
- URL for Doctor Concy
- English 112 Analysis Project
- BUNSS 4-1
- "Victory Motorcycles" Please respond to the following:
- Thereâs an old adage that says that history is always written by the winners. Although this is not always the...
- Select a major ruling that has changed or been modified over the last 20 to 30 years (e.g., Miranda advisements, search and seizure rules, the exclusionary rules, use of DNA evidence, police surveillance, data mining, etc.).