final 10
please follow all directions
3 years ago
28
ModuleTenPresentationGuidelinesandRubric-IHP-604-Q1480HealthcareQualityImprovement23TW1.pdf
HealthcareQualityImprovementInitiativeandEvaluationReport.docxpaper.docx
ModuleTenPresentationGuidelinesandRubric-IHP-604-Q1480HealthcareQualityImprovement23TW1.pdf
IHP 604 Module Ten Presentation Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
Congratulations! Your quality improvement initiative was approved by your manager. Now you need to communicate and build support for implementing your improvement initiative within
the organization to help ensure a smooth and effective implementation.
This assignment will help you perform both learning objectives in this module.
Prompt
Create a 7-to 15-slide presentation with detailed speaker notes that will create support and enthusiasm for your quality improvement initiative. You will need to select an audience for your
presentation that will be affected by your improvement initiative. Your presentation will only be given to your selected audience.
Speci�cally, you must address the following rubric criteria by including the following sections in your presentation:
1. Section 1: Selection of audience: Describe your selected audience and how the audience would be impacted by the quality improvement initiative.
2. Section 2: Metric analysis and opportunity for improvement description: Describe the relevant information for this audience from the �rst two parts of your course project related to
metric analysis and your process for identifying an opportunity for improvement.
3. Section 3: Quality improvement initiative recommendation description: Describe the quality improvement initiative for your selected audience, including information that would
generate enthusiasm for your quality improvement initiative.
4. Section 4: How this presentation will persuade and generate enthusiasm: Discuss techniques you used in the other sections of your presentation to persuade and generate enthusiasm
for your initiative from your selected audience.
5. Section 5: How this presentation will change behavior: Discuss techniques you used in the other sections of your presentation to encourage your selected audience to change behavior
related to your initiative.
What to Submit
Submit this assignment as a 7-to 15-slide presentation with detailed speaker notes. If you need writing support, you can access the Online Writing Center through the Academic Support
module of your course.
Module Ten Presentation Rubric
Criteria Exemplary (100%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Selection of Audience Describes selected audience and how audience would be impacted
by the quality improvement initiative
Does not attempt criterion 15
Metric Analysis and
Opportunity for
Improvement Description
Describes relevant information for audience from the �rst two
parts of course project related to metric analysis and process for
identifying an opportunity for improvement
Does not attempt criterion 15
Quality Improvement
Initiative Recommendation
Description
Describes quality improvement initiative for selected audience,
including information that would generate enthusiasm for the
quality improvement initiative
Does not attempt criterion 15
How Presentation Will
Persuade and Generate
Enthusiasm
Discusses techniques used in other sections of presentation to
persuade and generate enthusiasm for the initiative from selected
audience
Does not attempt criterion 20
How Presentation Will
Change Behavior
Discusses techniques used in other sections of presentation to
encourage selected audience to change behavior related to the
initiative
Does not attempt criterion 20
Articulation of Response Clearly conveys meaning with correct grammar, sentence
structure, and spelling, demonstrating an understanding of
audience and purpose
Submission has critical errors in grammar, sentence structure, and
spelling, preventing understanding of ideas
15
Total: 100%
HealthcareQualityImprovementInitiativeandEvaluationReport.docxpaper.docx
2
Healthcare Quality Improvement Initiative and Evaluation Report
Precious Teasley
Southern New Hampshire University
IHP-604-Q1480 Healthcare Quality Improvement 23TW1
Professor Barbara Brophy
November 8, 2023
Background
The healthcare organization selected is Mass General Brigham. Mass General Brigham is located in the state of Massachusetts and is considered the biggest healthcare facility based on the number of employees with approximately 74,000 employees working as physicians, nurses, support staff, researchers, and carers (Mass General Brigham, 2023). The medical facilities affiliated with Mass General Brigham include Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) and Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) which have also performed exceptionally well.
Metric Analysis
The two metrics that will be used for the hospital are hospital readmission rate and patient satisfaction score. According to Dukhanin et al., (2018), the hospital readmission rate is the proportion of patients readmitted within 30 days following discharge. It is an important metric that shows whether patients at the hospital are receiving proper care during hospitalization. A lower rate of hospital readmission rate means that patients are getting proper care during hospitalization and transferring easily to post-discharge treatment. According to a report by the Centre for Health Information and Analysis (2022), the Risk Standardization Readmission Rate for Mass General Brigham was 16%. This is quite higher than the national average even though the state of Massachusetts is usually ranked as having the highest hospital readmission rates. There is a lot that has to be done by the organization to improve on this metric. The higher rate of hospital readmission shows the ineffectiveness of treatment during past hospitalization (Wang et al., 2022).
The patient satisfaction score is a consumer experience metric that shows the satisfaction levels of the patient based on the overall treatment the patient has received. According to Doupe et al., (2019), hospitals and other health organizations use surveys to collect patient satisfaction levels, which represent their care perspective. This metric rates how happy the patient is with their healthcare on a scale of 1-5. The patient satisfaction score for Mass General Brigham between the period April 2021 to March 2022 was 81% (. This is higher than the national average which is 71%. A higher patient satisfaction score is good for the organization as it shows that the patient is satisfied with the healthcare received. However, patient satisfaction score looks at various aspects of the hospital like admission, rooms, quality of meals, communication with nurses and doctors, tests and treatment, visitors and family, discharge, and personal issues. This gives an overall assessment of the hospital showing whether the patient is satisfied with the treatment received. There is room for improvement in certain areas of the hospital like rooms and meals which received the lowest scores.
The data for the hospital readmission rates is received from the Centre for Health Information and Analysis. This is an independent state agency that offers an objective analysis of quality, utilization, and access to mass healthcare systems. The data for the patient satisfaction score are derived from surveys done by patients. The data is available on the hospital's website and is comparable with the national average.
Opportunity for Improvement
Metrics for hospital readmission rate is quite important. It can help in reducing mortality rates in the hospital. This is because when there is an increase in hospital readmission, there is likely to be an increase in mortality rates. There is a link between an increase in mortality rates and an increase in readmission rates (Gangu et al., 2022). Metrics on hospital readmission rates can also help the hospital find areas where they will make improvements to avoid losing money. Hospitals know that when the readmission rates are high the cost and quality of care are adversely affected.
The metrics for patient satisfaction score consist of various areas that may need improvement in the hospital. The metrics include data for admission, rooms, quality of meals, communication with nurses and doctors, tests and treatment, visitors and family, discharge, and personal issues. All these are different areas and departments in the hospital that can be analyzed to find room for improvement. According to the metrics for patient satisfaction score for Mass General Brigham (2023), the overall score surpasses the national average. However, some areas need improvement and create opportunities for the management of the hospital to make significant changes. An example would be making changes in communication between patients and medical staff like nurses and the physician. This is likely to improve the patient satisfaction score.
Root cause analysis is an evidence-based quality improvement tool that is applicable in healthcare. It is a methodology used to look into an occurrence and help find health system flaws that might not be obvious at first glance. The primary purpose of Root cause analysis is to pinpoint the system faults that caused or contributed to the incident, as well as to offer suggestions for mitigating or preventing a similar occurrence from happening again (Kwok et al., 2020). It is multidisciplinary and follows a methodical approach that aims to address three queries: What took place? Why did it take place? How can we make sure that doesn't happen again?
Root cause analysis can be used as a problem-solving tool for the issues that the hospital is facing. The tool can be applied differently at the hospital to help in finding system vulnerabilities that are leading to the problems. When looking at the issue of the high rate of hospital readmissions, Root cause analysis can effectively be used in pinpointing the system vulnerabilities that are leading to the high rates. The tool can then be used in coming up with solutions to the vulnerabilities that would help in reducing the high rate of hospital readmissions. It can also be used to show why certain aspects of the patient satisfaction score have lower scores than others. The tool will pinpoint the exact issues that are leading to lower scores in certain aspects and help in coming up with solutions that will help in increasing the scores.
Recommendations
The hospital should apply Root Cause Analysis (RCA) as a strategy that will help them in identifying any system faults that caused or contributed to an incident. This tool is effective as it will also help in coming up with solutions to the problem and ensuring the prevention of similar occurrences. The recommendation to the organization is to use RCA in improving the quality of health care and delivery. This will help the organization in reducing the rate of hospital readmissions and improve the various aspects of patient satisfaction scores.
Evaluation
|
Period |
Evaluation Method |
|
1 month |
Focus Group. This will involve an interview of participants who will be the staff at the hospital. Certain questions will be prepared and the participants will give responses to the questions. The questions will be about the application of RCA. This will be done after a month to determine the impact of RCA on the organization. |
|
3 months |
Impact evaluation. This is an evaluation method that provides information about the impact of an intervention. This will be done to either improve the intervention (RCA) or reorient it. It will involve the collection of data for the first three months of the intervention being applied. Data collection methods will include staff surveys, patient surveys, interviews, and data from the focus group discussion. The data collected will be used to evaluate the RCA. |
|
6 months |
Focused Audit. This is a topic-specific audit that is directed to the performance of the RCA. The focused audit will be based on two critical factors; the medical industry and organizational performance. |
|
12 months |
Cost-benefit Analysis. This will be used to evaluate the economic impact of the RCA on the organization. As an intervention, the RCA is supposed to help in improving health care quality and delivery. A cost-benefit analysis will measure the benefits against the costs that are associated with taking action. |
Data Collection Tools
The data collection Tools that will be used will include staff surveys, patient surveys, interviews, and data from the focus group discussion. Patient surveys will offer insight into the quality of healthcare they receive when visiting the hospital. Staff surveys will be used in evaluating the effectiveness of RCA to the organization. Staff surveys and interviews will also be used in evaluating aspects that have been initiated to mitigate any problems.
References
Centre for Health Information and Analysis. (2022). Hospital-Wide Adult All-Payer Readmissions In Massachusetts: SFY 2011-2020. Retrieved from https://www.chiamass.gov/assets/docs/r/pubs/2022/Readmissions-Report-2011-2020.pdf
Doupe, P., Faghmous, J., & Basu, S. (2019). Machine Learning for Health Services Researchers. Value in Health, 22(7), 808–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.012
Dukhanin, V., Topazian, R., & DeCamp, M. (2018). Metrics and evaluation tools for patient engagement in healthcare organization- and system-level decisionmaking: A systematic review. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 7(10), 889–903. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.43
Gangu, K., Bobba, A., Chela, H. K., Avula, S., Basida, S., & Yadav, N. (2022). In-Hospital Mortality Rate and Predictors of 30-Day Readmission in Patients With Heart Failure Exacerbation and Atrial Fibrillation: A Cross-Sectional Study. International journal of heart failure, 4(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.36628/ijhf.2022.0002
Mass General Brigham. (2023). About Mass General Brigham. retrieved from https://innovation.massgeneralbrigham.org/about/about-mass-general-brigham
Mass General Brigham. (2023). Overall Rating of Hospital. Retrieved from https://www.massgeneral.org/quality-and-safety/patient-experience/overall-rating
Kwok, Y. T. A., Mah, A. P., & Pang, K. M. (2020). Our first review: an evaluation of the effectiveness of root cause analysis recommendations in Hong Kong public hospitals. BMC Health Services Research, 20, 1-9.
Wang, Y., Eldridge, N., Metersky, M. L., Rodrick, D., Faniel, C., Eckenrode, S., Mathew, J., Galusha, D. H., Tasimi, A., Ho, S. Y., Jaser, L., Peterson, A., Normand, S. T., & Krumholz, H. M. (2022). Analysis of Hospital-Level Readmission Rates and Variation in Adverse Events Among Patients With Pneumonia in the United States. JAMA Network open, 5(5), e2214586. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14586
- The News Media.
- "Course Recap" Please respond to the following: Make a list of 25 professions that rely on math. Identify and discuss three key principles learned in the course. Discuss how each of these principles can help you in your current or future life circumstan
- Research paper (7 pages) Soccer History
- I need a memo / note for XYZ that will explain in detail the financial position of this company balance sheet. Ratio and graph can be included.
- quick post next day
- Transfer pricing of assets, funds, services ect.
- What volume of gas at stp is the amount of h2 gas?
- Assignment 2: What Went Wrong?
- Balancing Goal Attainment and Ethics
- 8 Page Paper/10 slide Power Pointe-Case Study- Public Admin