Evidence-Based Practice II

profileTinacherry100$
Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework help

 Journal Entry  

  • 2 years ago
  • 20
Report issue
files (1)

journal.entry.EvidenceBasedPracticeII.docx

Evidence Based Practice II

Journal Entry 1

Submit a journal entry (along with your time log)= I WILLL COMPLETE THE TIME LOG. The journal entry is your opportunity to be self-reflective. It should connect your previous professional experience with your practice, competencies/concepts in the program, and the literature. See the Practicum Guidelines, located in the  Practicum area and in this week’s Learning Resources, for a complete description of the practicum.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 

WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Resources

· Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021).  Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines (4th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International.

· Chapter 8, “Translation” (pp. 189–206) 

· Sipes, C. (2024).  Project management for the advanced practice nurse (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing.

· Chapter 4, “Planning: Project Management – Phase 2” (pp. 85–130)

· White, K. M., Dudley-Brown, S., & Terhaar, M. F. (Eds.). (2021).  Translation of evidence into nursing and healthcare (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing.

·

· Chapter 8, “Methods for Translation” (pp. 173–196)

· Chapter 9, “Project Management for Translation” (pp. 199–228)

· Chapter 10, “Ethical Responsibilities of Translation of Evidence and Evaluation” (pp. 229–244)

· Chapter 17, “Best Practices in Translation: Challenges and Barriers in Translation” (pp. 337–346)

· Chapter 18, “Legal Issues in Translation” (pp. 347–354) 

· American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2021).  The essentials: Core competencies for professional nursing educationLinks to an external site. . https://www.aacnnursing.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Publications/Essentials-2021.pdf

· Walden University Oasis: Writing Center. (n.d.).  Citations: OverviewLinks to an external site. . https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/citations 

· Walden University Oasis: Writing Center. (n.d.).  Common assignments: Discussion postLinks to an external site. . https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/discussionpost 

Examples of Clinical and Administrative Practice Changes - Implementation of Evidence

· Álvarez-Maldonado, P., Reding-Bernal, A., Hernández-Solís, A., & Cicero-Sabido, R. (2019).  Impact of strategic planning, organizational culture imprint and care bundles to reduce adverse events in the ICULinks to an external site..  International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 31(6), 480–484. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy198

· Barnes-Daly, M. A., Pun, B. T., Harmon, L. A., Byrum, D. G., Kumar, V. K., Devlin, J. W., Stollings, J. L., Puntillo, K. A., Engel, H. J., Posa, P. J., Barr, J., Schweickert, W. D., Esbrook, C. L., Hargett, K. D., Carson, S. S., Aldrich, J. M., Ely, E. W., & Balas, M. C. (2018).  Improving health care for critically ill patients using an evidence-based collaborative approach to ABCDEF bundle dissemination and implementationLinks to an external site..  Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 15(3), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12290

· Baughman, A., Cain, G., Ruopp, M., Concepcion, C., Oliveira, C., O'Toole, R., Saunders, S., Jindal, S., Ferreira, M., & Simon, S. (2018).  Improving access to care by admission process redesign in a veterans affairs skilled nursing facilityLinks to an external site..  The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 44(8), 454–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.04.002

· Busca, E., Savatteri, A., Calafato, T. L., Mazzoleni, B., Barisone, M., & Dal Molin, A. (2021).  Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of nurse’s role in primary care settings: An integrative reviewLinks to an external site. .  BMC Nursing, 20(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00696-y

· Curtis, K., Fry, M., Shaban, R. Z., & Considine, J. (2017).  Translating research findings to clinical nursing practiceLinks to an external site..  Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(5–6), 862–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13586

· Lockwood, C., & Hopp, L. (2016). Knowledge translation:  What it is and the relevance to evidence-based healthcare and nursingLinks to an external site..  International Journal of Nursing Practice, 22(4), 319–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12466

· Naqib, D., Purvin, M., Prasad, R., Hanna, I. M., Dimitri, S., Llufrio, A., & Hanna, M. N. (2018).  Quality improvement initiative to improve postoperative pain with a clinical pathway and nursing education programLinks to an external site..  Pain Management Nursing, 19(5), 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2018.06.005 

· Reed, J. E., Howe, C., Doyle, C., & Bell, D. (2018).  Simple rules for evidence translation in complex systems: A qualitative studyLinks to an external site..  BMC Medicine, 92 (16), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1076-9

· Schuller, K. A., Kash, B. A., Edwardson, N., & Gamm, L. D. (2013).  Enabling and disabling factors in implementation of Studer Group’s evidence-based leadership initiative: A qualitative case studyLinks to an external site..  Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 6(2), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1179/1753807613Y.0000000033

· Yeager, L, Karp, S., & Leming-Lee, T. (2019).  Barriers to the implementation of pediatric overweight and obesity guidelines in a school-based health centerLinks to an external site..  The Nursing Clinics of North America, 54(1), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2018.10.003

·

· Rubric

· NURS_8503_Week3_Assignment3_Rubric

NURS_8503_Week3_Assignment3_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflect on the practicum experience hours completed.

45 to >40.0 pts

Excellent

The response comprehensively and clearly reflects on the practicum experience. ... The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the reflection.

40 to >35.0 pts

Good

The response clearly reflects on the practicum experience. ... The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the reflection.

35 to >31.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely reflects on the practicum experience. ... The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the reflection.

31 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely reflects on the practicum experience, or it is missing. ... The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support reflection, or it is missing.

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComplete the Practicum Time Log.

40 to >0.0 pts

Excellent

A completed Practicum Time Log is submitted.

0 pts

Fair

0 pts

Good

0 pts

Poor

An incomplete Practicum Time Log is submitted, or it is missing.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. ... A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. ... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. ... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. ... Purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion were not provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (more than five) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) APA format errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (more than five) APA format errors

5 pts

Total Points: 100