Ethical Responsibilities and Professionalism Journal

Ethical Responsibilities and Professionalism Journal Guidelines and Rubric.html

SCS 224 Ethical Responsibilities and Professionalism Journal Guidelines and Rubric

Overview

It is important to be aware of stakeholders' rights and wishes when dealing with ethical conflicts in the field or during research. Keep the following questions in mind as you write this week’s journal entry: What is an institutional review board (IRB), and what is its purpose? Do you think it actually works? Why, or why not?

Prompt

Choose one of three ethical dilemmas and write a response in your journal. As you respond to the specific ethical dilemma, consider the role of the IRB. What is an IRB? What is its purpose? Would the IRB protect everyone involved in your research? If so, how?

1. You are an epidemiologist and you have just proposed a grant to a large government institution. After a few months of waiting, you discover that the government has accepted your proposal—this is the research offer of a lifetime. You will receive the entirety of your requested funds ($250,000) to run a three-year project examining the differences of rural homes’ and urban dwellings’ access to clean water sources in Haiti and its impacts to overall human health. During your final year of research, you realize that after your results are published, the study sites will be greatly impacted—people’s homes will be torn down and they will be forced to move from lands that are special to their culture. You know that getting access to clean water will eventually help their families survive, but the present generations will likely suffer the consequences of government relocation. What do you do?
2. You are a sociologist studying gang violence on the fringes of a large American urban city. The people you interview and their families have a high likelihood to suffer increased levels of violence if they are seen communicating with you. Your reports must be published and interviewees must sign a consent form, so there is potential for word to spread of their involvement with you and your institution. You believe that the neighborhood will undoubtedly benefit from a social scientific examination of how violence affects childhood development, but you are putting yourself and other families at risk in the present. How do you choose to conduct your research and gather data in such a high-risk area?
3. You are a cultural anthropologist who has been looking for a research position for six months, and your finances are stretched to the breaking point. To your surprise, you are contacted by a major network TV company for a funded opportunity to document the “untouched tribes” of Brazil. With the approval of the Brazilian government already established, do you make contact with a group of peoples who have not had interaction with much (if any) of the Western world in order to be published and receive a substantial paycheck? Do you deny the opportunity altogether knowing that someone else will likely fill your position? Do you accept in hopes that you will make contact as sensitively as possible, not trusting someone else to do it? Is it even your place to protect the cultural environment of people you do not know?

Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

• Institutional review board
• Does the IRB work?
• Ethical dilemma

What to Submit

Journal entries should be one page in length. All citations should be completed using APA format.

AI Usage

If you use gen AI tools to support your work on this assignment, be sure to follow these AI usage guidelines. You must acknowledge your use of these tools in your work. Guidelines on how to cite AI tools can be found in this Shapiro Library guide.

Ethical Responsibilities and Professionalism Journal Rubric

Criteria	Exceeds Expectations (100%)	Meets Expectations (85%)	Partially Meets Expectations (55%)	Does Not Meet Expectations (0%)	Value
Institutional Review Board	Exceeds expectations and uses clear and relevant examples to explain the IRB in the ethical dilemma scenario	Effectively explains the IRB in the ethical dilemma scenario	Ineffectively explains the IRB in the ethical dilemma scenario	Does not explain the IRB in the ethical dilemma scenario	30
Does the IRB Work?	Exceeds expectations and uses clear and relevant examples to explain if the IRB works in the ethical dilemma scenario	Effectively explains if the IRB works in the ethical dilemma scenario	Ineffectively explains if the IRB works in the ethical dilemma scenario	Does not explain if the IRB works in the ethical dilemma scenario	30
Ethical Dilemma	Exceeds expectations and uses clear and relevant examples to analyze the ethical dilemma in the scenario	Sufficiently analyzes the ethical dilemma in the scenario	Insufficiently analyzes the ethical dilemma in the scenario	Does not analyze the ethical dilemma in the scenario	30
Clear Communication	Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understanding	Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience	Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding	Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication	5
Citations and Attributions	Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with few or no minor errors	Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with consistent minor errors	Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with major errors	Does not use citations for ideas requiring attribution	5
Total:	100%