English HOMEWORK
3 years ago
150
Module4discussion8instructions.docx
Module3discussion6instructions.docx
Module4discussion9instructionsGrammarandSpellingCheck.docx
Module3discussion7instructions.docx
Module4assignment7Instructions.docx
module3assignment6instructionsRoughDraft.docx
Module4discussion8instructions.docx
Due Date: Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. PST Word limit: 300 words maximum Points: 20
Purpose: Developing a mature writing process is one of the keys to becoming a better writer. Part of developing the process is being aware of your growth through thoughtful reflection.
Task:
1. Be sure you have read "Growing Your Writing Process" before writing your post.
2. In 100 to 150 words, describe the steps of your writing process.
3. In 50 to 100 words, describe if, according to the lesson, you see your revision strategies mostly in the beginner, intermediate, or advanced categories and why. Do you feel like your writing process is growing?
Criteria for Success
Successful reflections will show comprehension of the lesson on the writing process of beginning, intermediate, and advanced writers. It will thoughtfully describe your own writing process and the growth you may have experienced.
Module3discussion6instructions.docx
Due Date: Thursday, 11:59 p.m. PST Word Limit: 200-300 words Points: 30
Purpose: Conclusions are your last impression on your reader. They wrap up your points, suggest new directions, and urge audiences to action. Choosing the best conclusion strategy depends on your purpose, audience, and the conventions of your field. In this discussion, you will draft a conclusion paragraph that uses a common conclusion strategy and then you will reflect on your choice.
Task:
1. Read the lesson on conclusion strategies.
2. Compose a conclusion paragraph in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). The paragraph should be between 150-250 words. In your paragraph, use one or more of the strategies we reviewed in the lesson.
· So What? Explain Importance/ Synthesize.
· Pose Questions for Future Research or Study/ What Now?
· Echo the Introduction
· Call to Action
· Use Quotations to Amplify your Main Point
3. In 50 words, reflect on which conclusion strategy(s) you chose and why.
4. Start a new discussion post below and copy and paste your conclusion paragraph and rationale for your strategy into the post below.
Criteria for Success Conclusion paragraphs will be graded based on quality and according to the associated rubric.
Module4discussion9instructionsGrammarandSpellingCheck.docx
Grammar and Spelling Check
Due Date: Thursday, 11:59 p.m. PST Points: 20
Purpose: Use a grammar checker to find three errors in your paper and explain why you made the error, according to the grammar checker. Grammar checkers handy for finding any spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors that you have made in your paper, but did you know that they can also explain why what you did is considered incorrect? Everyone makes spelling or grammatical mistakes, even your professors, but we should really take the time to learn how to avoid the mistake in the first place. Knowing grammar rules and fixing your most common spelling errors will make you a more confident writer and save you from embarrassing situations in the future.
Task:
1. Use Grammarly or Microsoft Word's grammar checker and find three errors in your paper. If you don't have Grammarly or Word, National University provides these programs for you for free. See "Criteria for Success" below.
2. For each error:
·
· If it is a grammar or style error, click on the error to display the rule that the grammar checker says you have broken and paste that rule below. Return to the examples in the lesson "Using Grammar Checkers..." for help.
· If it is a spelling error, take a moment to think up a trick for remembering the correct spelling in the future. For example, 'receive' is a commonly misspelled word. In the correct spelling of 'receive,' e comes before i. I remember the correct spelling by the sentence: " Rece, I've got to talk to you." Make up your own way to remember the spelling of your commonly misspelled word(s).
· Start a new discussion post and share the three errors, along with the rule broken or the trick you've come up with.
Criteria for Success:
If you complete the requirements of the assignment, you will receive full credit.
If you don't have Grammarly, install Grammarly through the Library . Follow the instructions on the page, and be sure to sign up using your NU email.
If you don't have Microsoft Word, follow these instructions* to download and install it. Please note that the icon on your SSO dashboard says "NU Student Mail," and not "Student Microsoft Office 365 Mail." When you download Word, you can also install other software from Microsoft Office 365, including Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, and more.)
Module3discussion7instructions.docx
Due Dates:
· Rough draft: Friday, 11:59 p.m. PST
· Three critiques: Sunday, 11:59 p.m. PST
Word limits:
· Rough draft: 5-6 pages
· Three critiques: 200 words each
Points: 30 (ten points per critique)
Purpose: Peer review is an integral part of the writing process for students and professional academics. Through the peer review process we receive valuable feedback on our writing that helps us get distance and perspective on our work. Peer review also helps us learn discourse and genre conventions by reading the work of others.
Task:
1. Start a new discussion thread below. Post a copy of your rough draft in the text box (please do not post as an attachment) by Friday, 11:59 p.m. PT. You will be forgiven for any formatting issues this creates.
2. Write three, 200-word-minimum critiques to your classmates. Your first two critiques may be to anyone you like, but the third must be to whichever student has the fewest number of critiques on the discussion board at the time you are posting. As you write your critiques, focus mostly on global comments instead of specific concerns. Here is a description of each:
Global Comments (your peer review should focus on these)
·
· What is the paper's thesis?
· Do you agree with the paper's main points? Are there some sources the author could have used to support his or her points more?
· Do you disagree with any part of the paper? Could you play devil's advocate? If so, what sources would you quote to counter the paper's argument?
· Do you feel like the paper was misreading the points of any of the authors or taking them too much out of context?
· Did the author adequately set up the debate? Did the author leave out any voices he or she might want to address?
· Did you feel lost in the paper at any time? If so, what did you find confusing?
· Are there any questions about the paper's argument that popped into your mind that you thought the paper could address?
· Did the paper feel organized? Did you feel guided through the paper or like you had to figure out where it was going?
· What parts of the argument did you feel were the strongest?
· Do the introduction and conclusion do the job they are supposed to do?
Specific Concerns (comment on these sparingly)
·
· Is the paper using its chosen citation style correctly?
· Are there patterns of grammar or spelling mistakes?
· Is the tone and language of the paper formal enough for academic writing?
IMPORTANT NOTE: YOU MUST ALSO POST YOUR ROUGH DRAFT IN THE ASSIGNMENT DROP BOX ON THE WEEK 3 BUTTON FOR YOUR INSTRUCTOR. IT MUST BE POSTED IN BOTH PLACES.
Criteria for Success:
Successful critiques will be thoughtful and constructive, focusing mostly on global comments over specific concerns.
Module4assignment7Instructions.docx
|
Instructions |
|
|
ENG 240: Final Paper – Writing in the Disciplines Due Saturday, 11:59 p.m. PST, the final day of class. Points: 500
PURPOSE: In this paper, you will continue to practice basic discourse patterns common to all academic writing, but with the specific focus of moving closer to the discourse conventions in your chosen major, recognizing that scholars in different fields may use somewhat different discourse patterns or conventions. This paper will also reinforce fundamental patterns of academic writing that apply to all fields. The purpose of the paper is also simply to practice more high-stakes writing before entering the upper-division courses of study.
TASK: 1. The library guide for this class ( https://nu.libguides.com/ENG240 ) contains readings in every undergraduate major that requires this class. Read the articles in the tab that corresponds to your major area of study. If you don't know what your major will be or if you are pursuing general studies, you may choose any subject that interests you. 2. Compose a 5- or 6-page double-spaced research paper written in response to one or more of the class readings. This paper will focus on an argument. This means it will make an arguable claim on a debatable subject or (possibly) propose and answer a research question in your field. All the assignments in this class have helped you prepare for the final assignment, so you should have much of the work completed already. Now it is time to assemble it all into a coherent whole. 3. Submit your final paper as a docx, .rtf, or .pdf file.
Other Requirements: Citation Style You will cite your paper in the citation style preferred by the discipline in which you are writing. Include a works cited or references page in the same citation style. If you use a citation style that is not MLA or APA, please let your instructor know which citation style you use.
Sources Academic writing is a conversation. Your final paper must use five credible sources that support your argument or add to the conversation around your main point. Two of your sources must be peer-reviewed journals. Two of your sources must not be listed on the course library guide. You must find them through your own research.
Acceptable scholarly sources include: · Books/ebooks · Scholarly or Professional Journals Acceptable popular sources include: · Magazines · Newspapers · Websites (if scrupulously chosen)
In many academic papers, popular sources will not be allowed, but since this paper may make a claim about a topical, polemic subject in your field, popular sources used for the sake of conveying popular interest or public exigency in a problem are acceptable if used judiciously.
The paper should consider all of the basic conventions of academic writing learned in ENG 102 (or whichever introductory composition course you completed at another university). The paper should be thoroughly edited and proofread. Submission To repeat, final papers should be submitted as a Microsoft Word document (.doc or .docx) or as a .rtf file. Do not submit as a .pdf, a Microsoft works file, or a Word Perfect file. If you think there may have been any technological error when submitting your paper, it is best to email your paper to your instructor as a backup so you will not be counted late.
No Recycling!
If you took English 102 here at National, it may be tempting to improve your ENG 102 paper and turn it in for ENG 240. This is against the rules. You are expected to write a wholly new paper. Your instructor in this class will have taught ENG 102 many times before and will be familiar with all the subjects in ENG 102. On the flip side, since we are focusing on disciplines in this class, it might be tempting to try to recycle a research paper you have written in another class. This is also against the rules and will easily be detected by your instructor. To use the work written in one class to fulfill the requirements of another will be considered academic dishonesty, and the university may reprimand you. This class is about practice. You don't become an excellent writer with just one try. So, please, recycle your aluminum cans and your plastic water bottles, but recycling papers is not allowed in college-level work.
Criteria for Success
To understand what makes a successful paper, let’s look at the highest levels of the associated rubric.
Critical Thinking · Paper enacts critical thinking in written discourse by evaluating sources, questioning assumptions, being fair to other viewpoints, and using higher-level thinking skills of analysis and synthesis. Critical thinking is clearly developed through productive struggle in the writing process as a way to find, develop, and support ideas with clear evidence. Text in Conversation/Research · Paper makes a very strong and necessary point that adds to the conversation. Paper finds a research “niche” so research is relevant and valuable in itself. Paper impeccably employs use of summary, quotations, and framing the conversation in both primary and secondary sources. Sources are used judiciously and properly. Thesis and Organization · Thesis is specific, insightful, and predicts the paper’s main points. Organization moves flawlessly, and the reader at no times feels lost. Paper uses metacommentary and other forecasting strategies. Each paragraph of the paper fulfills its role and feels necessary. Revision · Paper shows that the student is using the writing process as a thinking process, discovering and changing major points along the way toward significant improvement. Revision efforts show the student does not settle for “good enough,” even if the initial draft is solid. Grammar, Style, and Citation · Paper is free of grammatical errors that would impede comprehension. Proper citation style use shows the use of a style guide for difficult citations. |
module3assignment6instructionsRoughDraft.docx
|
Rough Draft Due Date: Friday, 11:59 p.m. PST Word limit: 5-6 double-spaced pages. Points: 50 NOTE: YOU MUST ALSO POST A COPY OF YOUR PAPER ON THE WEEK 3 DISCUSSION BOARD SO YOUR PEERS MAY REVIEW IT. · Week Three Rough Draft Rubric - PDF Document (158 KB) Now would be a good time to preview the Final Paper assignment ENG 240: Final Paper – Writing in the Disciplines Due Saturday, 11:59 p.m. PST, the final day of class. Points: 500
PURPOSE: In this paper, you will continue to practice basic discourse patterns common to all academic writing, but with the specific focus of moving closer to the discourse conventions in your chosen major, recognizing that scholars in different fields may use somewhat different discourse patterns or conventions. This paper will also reinforce fundamental patterns of academic writing that apply to all fields. The purpose of the paper is also simply to practice more high-stakes writing before entering the upper-division courses of study.
TASK: 1. The library guide for this class ( https://nu.libguides.com/ENG240 ) contains readings in every undergraduate major that requires this class. Read the articles in the tab that corresponds to your major area of study. If you don't know what your major will be or if you are pursuing general studies, you may choose any subject that interests you. 2. Compose a 5- or 6-page double-spaced research paper written in response to one or more of the class readings. This paper will focus on an argument. This means it will make an arguable claim on a debatable subject or (possibly) propose and answer a research question in your field. All the assignments in this class have helped you prepare for the final assignment, so you should have much of the work completed already. Now it is time to assemble it all into a coherent whole. 3. Submit your final paper as a docx, .rtf, or .pdf file.
Other Requirements: Citation Style You will cite your paper in the citation style preferred by the discipline in which you are writing. Include a works cited or references page in the same citation style. If you use a citation style that is not MLA or APA, please let your instructor know which citation style you use.
Sources Academic writing is a conversation. Your final paper must use five credible sources that support your argument or add to the conversation around your main point. Two of your sources must be peer-reviewed journals. Two of your sources must not be listed on the course library guide. You must find them through your own research.
Acceptable scholarly sources include: · Books/ebooks · Scholarly or Professional Journals Acceptable popular sources include: · Magazines · Newspapers · Websites (if scrupulously chosen)
In many academic papers, popular sources will not be allowed, but since this paper may make a claim about a topical, polemic subject in your field, popular sources used for the sake of conveying popular interest or public exigency in a problem are acceptable if used judiciously.
The paper should consider all of the basic conventions of academic writing learned in ENG 102 (or whichever introductory composition course you completed at another university). The paper should be thoroughly edited and proofread. Submission To repeat, final papers should be submitted as a Microsoft Word document (.doc or .docx) or as a .rtf file. Do not submit as a .pdf, a Microsoft works file, or a Word Perfect file. If you think there may have been any technological error when submitting your paper, it is best to email your paper to your instructor as a backup so you will not be counted late.
No Recycling!
If you took English 102 here at National, it might be tempting to improve your ENG 102 paper and turn it in for ENG 240. This is against the rules. You are expected to write a wholly new paper. Your instructor in this class will have taught ENG 102 many times before and will be familiar with all the subjects in ENG 102. On the flip side, since we are focusing on disciplines in this class, it might be tempting to try to recycle a research paper you have written in another class. This is also against the rules and will easily be detected by your instructor. To use the work written in one class to fulfill the requirements of another will be considered academic dishonesty, and the university may reprimand you. This class is about practice. You don't become an excellent writer with just one try. So, please, recycle your aluminum cans and plastic water bottles, but recycling papers is not allowed in college-level work.
Criteria for Success
To understand what makes a successful paper, let’s look at the highest levels of the associated rubric.
Critical Thinking · Paper enacts critical thinking in written discourse by evaluating sources, questioning assumptions, being fair to other viewpoints, and using higher-level thinking skills of analysis and synthesis. Critical thinking is clearly developed through productive struggle in the writing process as a way to find, develop, and support ideas with clear evidence. Text in Conversation/Research · Paper makes a very strong and necessary point that adds to the conversation. Paper finds a research “niche” so research is relevant and valuable in itself. Paper impeccably employs use of summary, quotations, and framing the conversation in both primary and secondary sources. Sources are used judiciously and properly. Thesis and Organization · Thesis is specific, insightful, and predicts the paper’s main points. Organization moves flawlessly, and the reader at no times feels lost. Paper uses metacommentary and other forecasting strategies. Each paragraph of the paper fulfills its role and feels necessary. Revision · Paper shows that the student is using the writing process as a thinking process, discovering and changing major points along the way toward significant improvement. Revision efforts show the student does not settle for “good enough,” even if the initial draft is solid. Grammar, Style, and Citation · Paper is free of grammatical errors that would impede comprehension. Proper citation style use shows the use of a style guide for difficult citations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due on Jan 19, 2024 11:59 PM Available on Jan 8, 2024 12:01 AM. Access restricted before availability starts. Available until Jan 19, 2024 11:59 PM. Access restricted after availability ends. |