Education need help with homework

Rubric Criteria

collapse all Rubric CriteriaCollapse All

Technology and Student Engagement

8 points

Criteria Description

Technology and Student Engagement

5. Target

8 points

Explanation of why teachers should utilize technology in the classroom is exceptional and skillfully describes how it benefits student engagement, creativity, persistence, and self-motivation.

4. Acceptable

6.96 points

Explanation of why teachers should utilize technology in the classroom is solid and logically describes how it benefits student engagement, creativity, persistence, and self-motivation.

3. Approaching

5.92 points

Explanation of why teachers should utilize technology in the classroom is surface level and weakly describes how it benefits student engagement, creativity, persistence, and self-motivation.

2. Insufficient

5.52 points

Explanation of why teachers should utilize technology in the classroom is flawed and insufficiently describes how it benefits student engagement, creativity, persistence, and self-motivation.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Strategies or Tools to Integrate Technology

8 points

Criteria Description

Strategies or Tools to Integrate Technology

5. Target

8 points

Strategies or tools that teachers can utilize to integrate technology into the classroom to increase student engagement and motivation are novel. The strategy or tool that provides opportunities for students to virtually collaborate in an authentic, real-world learning experience with experts, teams, and/or other students locally and/or globally is innovative.

4. Acceptable

6.96 points

Strategies or tools that teachers can utilize to integrate technology into the classroom to increase student engagement and motivation are suitable. The strategy or tool that provides opportunities for students to virtually collaborate in an authentic, real-world learning experience with experts, teams, and/or other students locally and/or globally is noteworthy.

3. Approaching

5.92 points

Strategies or tools that teachers can utilize to integrate technology into the classroom to increase student engagement and motivation are artificial. The strategy or tool that provides opportunities for students to virtually collaborate in an authentic, real-world learning experience with experts, teams, and/or other students locally and/or globally is shallow.

2. Insufficient

5.52 points

Strategies or tools that teachers can utilize to integrate technology into the classroom are unrelated to increasing student engagement and motivation. The strategy or tool that provides opportunities for students to virtually collaborate in an authentic, real-world learning experience with experts, teams, and/or other students locally and/or globally is unrealistic.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Accessibility and Equity to All Students

8 points

Criteria Description

Accessibility and Equity to All Students

5. Target

8 points

Convincing discussion of how teachers can provide accessibility and equity to all students in the classroom, regardless of setting, with the use of technology tools, digital content, and other online learning opportunities is included.

4. Acceptable

6.96 points

Concise discussion of how teachers can provide accessibility and equity to all students in the classroom, regardless of setting, with the use of technology tools, digital content, and other online learning opportunities is included.

3. Approaching

5.92 points

Ambiguous discussion of how teachers can provide accessibility and equity to all students in the classroom, regardless of setting, with the use of technology tools, digital content, and other online learning opportunities is included.

2. Insufficient

5.52 points

Incomplete discussion of how teachers can provide accessibility and equity to all students in the classroom, regardless of setting, with the use of technology tools, digital content, and other online learning opportunities is included.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Digital Assessment Tool

8 points

Criteria Description

Digital Assessment Tool

5. Target

8 points

Digital assessment tool that teachers can utilize during instruction is ideal. Explanation of how the teacher can ensure the tool is equitable for all students is sophisticated.

4. Acceptable

6.96 points

Digital assessment tool that teachers can utilize during instruction is apt. Explanation of how the teacher can ensure the tool is equitable for all students is solid.

3. Approaching

5.92 points

Digital assessment tool that teachers can utilize during instruction does not demonstrate best practices. Explanation of how the teacher can ensure the tool is equitable for all students is vague.

2. Insufficient

5.52 points

Digital assessment tool that teachers can utilize during instruction is inadequate. Explanation of how the teacher can ensure the tool is equitable for all students is unintelligible.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Technology Barriers

8 points

Criteria Description

Technology Barriers

5. Target

8 points

Potential barriers students may encounter when using technology are insightful and solutions provided for each barrier are creative. One barrier comprehensively addresses safe technology use in the classroom and realistically explains how teachers can model and promote student management of their personal data, digital identity, and data privacy.

4. Acceptable

6.96 points

Potential barriers students may encounter when using technology are credible and solutions provided for each barrier are logical. One barrier suitably addresses safe technology use in the classroom and accurately explains how teachers can model and promote student management of their personal data, digital identity, and data privacy.

3. Approaching

5.92 points

Potential barriers students may encounter when using technology are cursory and solutions provided for each barrier are unfocused. One barrier minimally addresses safe technology use in the classroom and unclearly explains how teachers can model and promote student management of their personal data, digital identity, and data privacy.

2. Insufficient

5.52 points

Potential barriers students may encounter when using technology are unrealistic and solutions provided for each barrier are ineffective. One barrier irrelevantly addresses safe technology use in the classroom and inaccurately explains how teachers can model and promote student management of their personal data, digital identity, and data privacy.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Rules and Procedures

8 points

Criteria Description

Rules and Procedures

5. Target

8 points

Discussion of how rules and procedures in the classroom will create experiences for students to make positive, socially responsible contributions to the environment provides new insight. Discussion proficiently describes how students will be taught to demonstrate empathy in the online environment.

4. Acceptable

6.96 points

Discussion of how rules and procedures in the classroom will create experiences for students to make positive, socially responsible contributions to the environment is competent. Discussion successfully describes how students will be taught to demonstrate empathy in the online environment.

3. Approaching

5.92 points

Discussion of how rules and procedures in the classroom will create experiences for students to make positive, socially responsible contributions to the environment is inexplicit. Discussion minimally describes how students will be taught to demonstrate empathy in the online environment.

2. Insufficient

5.52 points

Discussion of how rules and procedures in the classroom will create experiences for students to make positive, socially responsible contributions to the environment is unintelligible. Discussion fails to describe how students will be taught to demonstrate empathy in the online environment.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Technology Used for Communication

8 points

Criteria Description

Technology Used for Communication

5. Target

8 points

Realistic explanation of how technology can be used to communicate with families about student progress, school-home support, and online resources relevant to the classroom is included. Explanation thoroughly discusses how all families will have access to information.

4. Acceptable

6.96 points

Sound explanation of how technology can be used to communicate with families about student progress, school-home support, and online resources relevant to the classroom is included. Explanation logically discusses how all families will have access to information.

3. Approaching

5.92 points

Weak explanation of how technology can be used to communicate with families about student progress, school-home support, and online resources relevant to the classroom is included. Explanation superficially discusses how all families will have access to information.

2. Insufficient

5.52 points

Poor explanation of how technology can be used to communicate with families about student progress, school-home support, and online resources relevant to the classroom is included. Explanation fails to discuss how all families will have access to information.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Dedicated Planning Time

8 points

Criteria Description

Dedicated Planning Time

5. Target

8 points

Convincing discussion of why it is important to dedicate planning time to collaborate with colleagues to create authentic learning experiences that leverage technology and provide opportunities to co-learn new digital resources and tools with students is included with realistic examples.

4. Acceptable

6.96 points

Significant discussion of why it is important to dedicate planning time to collaborate with colleagues to create authentic learning experiences that leverage technology and provide opportunities to co-learn new digital resources and tools with students is included with appropriate examples.

3. Approaching

5.92 points

Ambiguous discussion of why it is important to dedicate planning time to collaborate with colleagues to create authentic learning experiences that leverage technology and provide opportunities to co-learn new digital resources and tools with students is included with unclear examples.

2. Insufficient

5.52 points

Insufficient discussion of why it is important to dedicate planning time to collaborate with colleagues to create authentic learning experiences that leverage technology and provide opportunities to co-learn new digital resources and tools with students is included with inappropriate or unrealistic examples.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Organization

8 points

Criteria Description

Organization

5. Target

8 points

The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Acceptable

6.96 points

The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

3. Approaching

5.92 points

The content is not well organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea.

2. Insufficient

5.52 points

An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Supporting Research and Documentation of Sources

4 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate designated style and formatting to document sources in citations and references.

5. Target

4 points

Supporting research is compelling and thorough. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Acceptable

3.48 points

Supporting research is credible and relevant. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Approaching

2.96 points

Supporting research is minimal and somewhat inaccurate. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although several minor formatting errors are present.

2. Insufficient

2.76 points

Supporting research is ineffective. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Mechanics of Writing

4 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

5. Target

4 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable

3.48 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching

2.96 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

2. Insufficient

2.76 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Total80 points

© 2024.  Grand Canyon University . All Rights Reserved.

Rubric Criteria

collapse all Rubric CriteriaCollapse All

Technology and Student Engagement

8 points

Criteria Description

Technology and Student Engagement

5. Target

8 points

Explanation of why teachers should utilize technology in the classroom is exceptional and skillfully describes how it benefits student engagement, creativity, persistence, and self-motivation.

4. Acceptable

6.96 points

Explanation of why teachers should utilize technology in the classroom is solid and logically describes how it benefits student engagement, creativity, persistence, and self-motivation.

3. Approaching

5.92 points

Explanation of why teachers should utilize technology in the classroom is surface level and weakly describes how it benefits student engagement, creativity, persistence, and self-motivation.

2. Insufficient

5.52 points

Explanation of why teachers should utilize technology in the classroom is flawed and insufficiently describes how it benefits student engagement, creativity, persistence, and self-motivation.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Strategies or Tools to Integrate Technology

8 points

Criteria Description

Strategies or Tools to Integrate Technology

5. Target

8 points

Strategies or tools that teachers can utilize to integrate technology into the classroom to increase student engagement and motivation are novel. The strategy or tool that provides opportunities for students to virtually collaborate in an authentic, real-world learning experience with experts, teams, and/or other students locally and/or globally is innovative.

4. Acceptable

6.96 points

Strategies or tools that teachers can utilize to integrate technology into the classroom to increase student engagement and motivation are suitable. The strategy or tool that provides opportunities for students to virtually collaborate in an authentic, real-world learning experience with experts, teams, and/or other students locally and/or globally is noteworthy.

3. Approaching

5.92 points

Strategies or tools that teachers can utilize to integrate technology into the classroom to increase student engagement and motivation are artificial. The strategy or tool that provides opportunities for students to virtually collaborate in an authentic, real-world learning experience with experts, teams, and/or other students locally and/or globally is shallow.

2. Insufficient

5.52 points

Strategies or tools that teachers can utilize to integrate technology into the classroom are unrelated to increasing student engagement and motivation. The strategy or tool that provides opportunities for students to virtually collaborate in an authentic, real-world learning experience with experts, teams, and/or other students locally and/or globally is unrealistic.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Accessibility and Equity to All Students

8 points

Criteria Description

Accessibility and Equity to All Students

5. Target

8 points

Convincing discussion of how teachers can provide accessibility and equity to all students in the classroom, regardless of setting, with the use of technology tools, digital content, and other online learning opportunities is included.

4. Acceptable

6.96 points

Concise discussion of how teachers can provide accessibility and equity to all students in the classroom, regardless of setting, with the use of technology tools, digital content, and other online learning opportunities is included.

3. Approaching

5.92 points

Ambiguous discussion of how teachers can provide accessibility and equity to all students in the classroom, regardless of setting, with the use of technology tools, digital content, and other online learning opportunities is included.

2. Insufficient

5.52 points

Incomplete discussion of how teachers can provide accessibility and equity to all students in the classroom, regardless of setting, with the use of technology tools, digital content, and other online learning opportunities is included.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Digital Assessment Tool

8 points

Criteria Description

Digital Assessment Tool

5. Target

8 points

Digital assessment tool that teachers can utilize during instruction is ideal. Explanation of how the teacher can ensure the tool is equitable for all students is sophisticated.

4. Acceptable

6.96 points

Digital assessment tool that teachers can utilize during instruction is apt. Explanation of how the teacher can ensure the tool is equitable for all students is solid.

3. Approaching

5.92 points

Digital assessment tool that teachers can utilize during instruction does not demonstrate best practices. Explanation of how the teacher can ensure the tool is equitable for all students is vague.

2. Insufficient

5.52 points

Digital assessment tool that teachers can utilize during instruction is inadequate. Explanation of how the teacher can ensure the tool is equitable for all students is unintelligible.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Technology Barriers

8 points

Criteria Description

Technology Barriers

5. Target

8 points

Potential barriers students may encounter when using technology are insightful and solutions provided for each barrier are creative. One barrier comprehensively addresses safe technology use in the classroom and realistically explains how teachers can model and promote student management of their personal data, digital identity, and data privacy.

4. Acceptable

6.96 points

Potential barriers students may encounter when using technology are credible and solutions provided for each barrier are logical. One barrier suitably addresses safe technology use in the classroom and accurately explains how teachers can model and promote student management of their personal data, digital identity, and data privacy.

3. Approaching

5.92 points

Potential barriers students may encounter when using technology are cursory and solutions provided for each barrier are unfocused. One barrier minimally addresses safe technology use in the classroom and unclearly explains how teachers can model and promote student management of their personal data, digital identity, and data privacy.

2. Insufficient

5.52 points

Potential barriers students may encounter when using technology are unrealistic and solutions provided for each barrier are ineffective. One barrier irrelevantly addresses safe technology use in the classroom and inaccurately explains how teachers can model and promote student management of their personal data, digital identity, and data privacy.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Rules and Procedures

8 points

Criteria Description

Rules and Procedures

5. Target

8 points

Discussion of how rules and procedures in the classroom will create experiences for students to make positive, socially responsible contributions to the environment provides new insight. Discussion proficiently describes how students will be taught to demonstrate empathy in the online environment.

4. Acceptable

6.96 points

Discussion of how rules and procedures in the classroom will create experiences for students to make positive, socially responsible contributions to the environment is competent. Discussion successfully describes how students will be taught to demonstrate empathy in the online environment.

3. Approaching

5.92 points

Discussion of how rules and procedures in the classroom will create experiences for students to make positive, socially responsible contributions to the environment is inexplicit. Discussion minimally describes how students will be taught to demonstrate empathy in the online environment.

2. Insufficient

5.52 points

Discussion of how rules and procedures in the classroom will create experiences for students to make positive, socially responsible contributions to the environment is unintelligible. Discussion fails to describe how students will be taught to demonstrate empathy in the online environment.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Technology Used for Communication

8 points

Criteria Description

Technology Used for Communication

5. Target

8 points

Realistic explanation of how technology can be used to communicate with families about student progress, school-home support, and online resources relevant to the classroom is included. Explanation thoroughly discusses how all families will have access to information.

4. Acceptable

6.96 points

Sound explanation of how technology can be used to communicate with families about student progress, school-home support, and online resources relevant to the classroom is included. Explanation logically discusses how all families will have access to information.

3. Approaching

5.92 points

Weak explanation of how technology can be used to communicate with families about student progress, school-home support, and online resources relevant to the classroom is included. Explanation superficially discusses how all families will have access to information.

2. Insufficient

5.52 points

Poor explanation of how technology can be used to communicate with families about student progress, school-home support, and online resources relevant to the classroom is included. Explanation fails to discuss how all families will have access to information.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Dedicated Planning Time

8 points

Criteria Description

Dedicated Planning Time

5. Target

8 points

Convincing discussion of why it is important to dedicate planning time to collaborate with colleagues to create authentic learning experiences that leverage technology and provide opportunities to co-learn new digital resources and tools with students is included with realistic examples.

4. Acceptable

6.96 points

Significant discussion of why it is important to dedicate planning time to collaborate with colleagues to create authentic learning experiences that leverage technology and provide opportunities to co-learn new digital resources and tools with students is included with appropriate examples.

3. Approaching

5.92 points

Ambiguous discussion of why it is important to dedicate planning time to collaborate with colleagues to create authentic learning experiences that leverage technology and provide opportunities to co-learn new digital resources and tools with students is included with unclear examples.

2. Insufficient

5.52 points

Insufficient discussion of why it is important to dedicate planning time to collaborate with colleagues to create authentic learning experiences that leverage technology and provide opportunities to co-learn new digital resources and tools with students is included with inappropriate or unrealistic examples.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Organization

8 points

Criteria Description

Organization

5. Target

8 points

The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Acceptable

6.96 points

The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

3. Approaching

5.92 points

The content is not well organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea.

2. Insufficient

5.52 points

An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Supporting Research and Documentation of Sources

4 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate designated style and formatting to document sources in citations and references.

5. Target

4 points

Supporting research is compelling and thorough. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Acceptable

3.48 points

Supporting research is credible and relevant. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Approaching

2.96 points

Supporting research is minimal and somewhat inaccurate. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although several minor formatting errors are present.

2. Insufficient

2.76 points

Supporting research is ineffective. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Mechanics of Writing

4 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

5. Target

4 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable

3.48 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching

2.96 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

2. Insufficient

2.76 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Total80 points

© 2024.  Grand Canyon University . All Rights Reserved.