Education Logic Model Assignment

Logic Model - Rubric Total 80 points

Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Less Than

Satisfactory 3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent

Behavior/Decision Making

Behavior/Decision Making

0 points

Student does not identify the

ethical behavior or moral

decision making when

resolving ethical dilemmas

within the issue or barrier

you identified for the

stakeholders.

7.8 points

Student is vague in

attempting to identify the

ethical behavior or moral

decision making when

resolving ethical dilemmas

within the issue or barrier

you identified for the

stakeholders.

9 points

Student provides cogent

insight into ethical behavior

or moral decision making

when resolving ethical

dilemmas within the issue or

barrier you identified for the

stakeholders.

10.2 points

Student identifies basic

ethical behavior or moral

decision making when

resolving ethical dilemmas

within the issue or barrier

you identified for the

stakeholders.

12 points

Student provides profound

insight into ethical behavior

or moral decision making

when resolving ethical

dilemmas within the issue or

barrier you identified for the

stakeholders.

Legislation/Regulation

Legislation/Regulation

0 points

Student does not consider

any legislation or regulation

that governs their field or

area of research.

7.8 points

Student attempt to consider

any legislation or regulation

that governs their field or

area of research is limited or

fails to address major

legislation or regulation.

9 points

Student thoroughly considers

any legislation or regulation

that governs their field or

area of research.

10.2 points

Student thoroughly considers

any legislation or regulation

that governs their field or

area of research, including

considering the impact of

future changes to legislation

and regulations.

12 points

Student does a good job

considering the impact of

legislation or regulation that

governs their field or area of

research.

Logic Model Template

Logic Model Template

0 points

Student’s logic model

template is confusing or

incomplete.

7.8 points

Student completes the logic

model template and all

inputs, outputs and

outcomes are appropriate to

the identified issue or

barrier.

9 points

Student completes the logic

model template and most

inputs, outputs and

outcomes are appropriate to

the identified issue or

barrier.

10.2 points

Student does not complete

the logic model template.

12 points

Student completes the logic

model template and their

inputs, outputs and

outcomes and organization

make for an extremely

effective tool for future work.

Christian Worldview

Christian Worldview

0 points

Student addresses the

Christian Worldview

elements of the assignment

but vaguely or as an

afterthought.

7.8 points

Student addresses the

Christian Worldview

elements of the assignment

in a basic but complete

manner.

9 points

Student does not address the

Christian Worldview

elements of the assignment.

10.2 points

Student addresses the

Christian Worldview

elements of the assignment

thoroughly and effectively.

12 points

Student addresses the

Christian Worldview

elements of the assignment

with insight that enhances

the overall assignment.

Research

Research

0 points

Research is adequate.

Sources are standard in

relevance, quality of outside

sources, and/or timeliness.

7.8 points

Research is timely and

relevant, and addresses all of

the issues stated in the

assignment criteria.

9 points

Few outside sources were

used to support the

assignment. Limited research

is apparent.

10.2 points

No outside sources were

used to support the

assignment.

12 points

Research is supportive of the

rationale presented. Sources

are distinctive. Addresses all

of the issues stated in the

assignment criteria.

Mechanics of Writing

Mechanics of Writing

(includes spelling,

punctuation, grammar, and

language use)

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive

enough that they impede

communication of meaning.

Inappropriate word choice or

sentence construction is

employed.

13 points

Frequent and repetitive

mechanical errors distract

the reader. Inconsistencies in

language choice (register) or

word choice are present.

Sentence structure is correct

but not varied.

15 points

The writer is clearly in

command of standard,

written, academic English.

17 points

Prose is largely free of

mechanical errors, although

a few may be present. The

writer uses a variety of

effective sentence structures

and figures of speech.

20 points

Some mechanical errors or

typos are present, but they

are not overly distracting to

the reader. Correct and

varied sentence structure

and audience-appropriate

language are employed.

© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

image1.jpeg

Logic Model - Rubric Total 80 points

Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Less Than

Satisfactory 3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent

Behavior/Decision Making

Behavior/Decision Making

0 points

Student does not identify the

ethical behavior or moral

decision making when

resolving ethical dilemmas

within the issue or barrier

you identified for the

stakeholders.

7.8 points

Student is vague in

attempting to identify the

ethical behavior or moral

decision making when

resolving ethical dilemmas

within the issue or barrier

you identified for the

stakeholders.

9 points

Student provides cogent

insight into ethical behavior

or moral decision making

when resolving ethical

dilemmas within the issue or

barrier you identified for the

stakeholders.

10.2 points

Student identifies basic

ethical behavior or moral

decision making when

resolving ethical dilemmas

within the issue or barrier

you identified for the

stakeholders.

12 points

Student provides profound

insight into ethical behavior

or moral decision making

when resolving ethical

dilemmas within the issue or

barrier you identified for the

stakeholders.

Legislation/Regulation

Legislation/Regulation

0 points

Student does not consider

any legislation or regulation

that governs their field or

area of research.

7.8 points

Student attempt to consider

any legislation or regulation

that governs their field or

area of research is limited or

fails to address major

legislation or regulation.

9 points

Student thoroughly considers

any legislation or regulation

that governs their field or

area of research.

10.2 points

Student thoroughly considers

any legislation or regulation

that governs their field or

area of research, including

considering the impact of

future changes to legislation

and regulations.

12 points

Student does a good job

considering the impact of

legislation or regulation that

governs their field or area of

research.

Logic Model Template

Logic Model Template

0 points

Student’s logic model

template is confusing or

incomplete.

7.8 points

Student completes the logic

model template and all

inputs, outputs and

outcomes are appropriate to

the identified issue or

barrier.

9 points

Student completes the logic

model template and most

inputs, outputs and

outcomes are appropriate to

the identified issue or

barrier.

10.2 points

Student does not complete

the logic model template.

12 points

Student completes the logic

model template and their

inputs, outputs and

outcomes and organization

make for an extremely

effective tool for future work.

Christian Worldview

Christian Worldview

0 points

Student addresses the

Christian Worldview

elements of the assignment

but vaguely or as an

afterthought.

7.8 points

Student addresses the

Christian Worldview

elements of the assignment

in a basic but complete

manner.

9 points

Student does not address the

Christian Worldview

elements of the assignment.

10.2 points

Student addresses the

Christian Worldview

elements of the assignment

thoroughly and effectively.

12 points

Student addresses the

Christian Worldview

elements of the assignment

with insight that enhances

the overall assignment.

Research

Research

0 points

Research is adequate.

Sources are standard in

relevance, quality of outside

sources, and/or timeliness.

7.8 points

Research is timely and

relevant, and addresses all of

the issues stated in the

assignment criteria.

9 points

Few outside sources were

used to support the

assignment. Limited research

is apparent.

10.2 points

No outside sources were

used to support the

assignment.

12 points

Research is supportive of the

rationale presented. Sources

are distinctive. Addresses all

of the issues stated in the

assignment criteria.

Mechanics of Writing

Mechanics of Writing

(includes spelling,

punctuation, grammar, and

language use)

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive

enough that they impede

communication of meaning.

Inappropriate word choice or

sentence construction is

employed.

13 points

Frequent and repetitive

mechanical errors distract

the reader. Inconsistencies in

language choice (register) or

word choice are present.

Sentence structure is correct

but not varied.

15 points

The writer is clearly in

command of standard,

written, academic English.

17 points

Prose is largely free of

mechanical errors, although

a few may be present. The

writer uses a variety of

effective sentence structures

and figures of speech.

20 points

Some mechanical errors or

typos are present, but they

are not overly distracting to

the reader. Correct and

varied sentence structure

and audience-appropriate

language are employed.

© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.