Education j jordan Philosophy of Ethics in Research Assignment
JordanjameirePlease see attachment
3 days ago
60
files (2)PhilosophyofEthicsinResearchAssignmentInstructions.docx
PhilosophyofEthicsinResearchGradingRubric.pdf
PhilosophyofEthicsinResearchAssignmentInstructions.docx
HSCI 705
Philosophy of Ethics in Research Assignment Instructions
Overview
Having a firm grasp of the ethical principles that will guide you as a researcher in your career are essential. This can be difficult to put into words and even writing. Writing down the ethical concepts will provide you with the confidence and map for you to conduct an ethical career. You will express with confidence your own sense of identity and values related to your views on ethics in research which are thoughtfully expressed and defended, and establishment of a foundation of belief that will allow for future actions “that are honest, courageous, and consistent with your beliefs.
Instructions
You will complete one 12—15-page paper (typed, double-spaced APA format with at least 5 biblical verses and 10 sources [peer reviewed research and textbooks]). Note that the the 12-15 pages is the minimum and maximum range for the body of the paper (i.e., this does not include cover page nor reference list).
The following is to be utilized as a guide for writing up your paper:
· Write an introduction (provide a brief summary of ethics in human subjects research).
· The body of the paper is where you will address your own mission statement and ethical philosophy. Next how do they serve as your guiding light in ethical dilemmas discussed within this course. How would they guide your decision making in the various aspects of research including publication, data, human subjects, mentorship, etc… You will cite specific ethical dilemmas that have been discussed in the course readings and discussion board activities and how their mission statement will guide them through the scenarios.
· You must include a concluding paragraph (or 2) that provides a brief summary of your paper as well as gives some ideas as to your future evaluation/reflection of your current ethical philosophy.
Components of the paper must include the following:
· An introduction
· A mission statement
· Ethical philosophy
· Integration of ethical dilemmas and how your philosophy guides your decisions
· publication
· data management
· protection of human subjects
· protection of animal subjects
· role of the IRB and informed consent
· mentorship
· Summary
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
PhilosophyofEthicsinResearchGradingRubric.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Content: Introduction and Mission Statement
25 to >20 pts
Advanced
Introduces the Philosophy of Ethics assignment with a clear and logical introduction. Clearly states the mission statement.
20 to >15 pts
Proficient
Introduces the Philosophy of Ethics assignment with a moderately clear introduction. The mission statement is present but may not be clear or concise.
15 to >0 pts
Developing
A weak or vague introduction is present. The mission statement may either be absent or not explicitly stated.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 25 pts
Content: Ethical Philosophy and ethical dilemmas
35 to >28 pts
Advanced
The ethical philosophy is clear stated and explained, providing clearly defined personal values and sense of ethical identity. Potential challenges, issues, or barriers to remaining consistent with the ethical philosophy are discussed. The chosen examples from the course readings. The analysis of the ethical examples is correct and aligns with their ethical philosophy.
28 to >21 pts
Proficient
The ethical philosophy and corresponding personal values and sense of ethical identity are defined, but could be clearer. Potential challenges, issues, or barriers to remaining consistent with the ethical philosophy are identified, but not in great detail. Some examples from the course readings are discussed in some detail. The analysis of the ethical examples is mostly correct and aligns with the ethical philosophy.
21 to >0 pts
Developing
The ethical philosophy and corresponding personal values and sense of ethical identity are not clearly defined. Potential challenges, issues, or barriers to remaining consistent with the ethical philosophy are not identified. Some to no examples from the course readings are discussed. The analysis of the ethical examples are not correct or does not align with the ethical philosophy.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 35 pts
Content: Discussion of Various Topics
35 to >28 pts
Advanced
Student provided an effective and informed summary of the required topics (publication, data management, protection of human subjects, protection of animal subjects, role of the IRB and informed consent, and mentorship), providing examples from the course and a discussion that is in line with their ethical philosophy for each topic.
28 to >21 pts
Proficient
Student provided a summary of the required topics (publication, data management, protection of human subjects, protection of animal subjects, role of the IRB and informed consent, and mentorship), but may have overlooked one of the topics. The student may have some incorrect statements or may not have properly utilized examples from the course. A discussion of how the topic is in line with their ethical philosophy may not be provided in great detail.
21 to >0 pts
Developing
Student did not provide a summary of more than one of the required topics. Examples from the course may not have been utilized, and a discussion of how the topic is in line with their ethical philosophy may not be provided.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 35 pts
Philosophy of Ethics in Research Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Points
Structure: Grammar
20 to >16 pts
Advanced
Writing is clear, concise, and well-organized with no grammatical and/or spelling errors. Paragraphs contain appropriately varied sentence structures
16 to >12 pts
Proficient
Writing is mostly clear and organized, with a small number of grammatical and/or spelling errors. Errors do not take away from reader comprehension of the assignment. Some sentences are not presented well. Some paragraphs contain some varied sentences.
12 to >0 pts
Developing
Writing is unclear and disorganized, with a large number of grammatical and/or spelling errors. Errors can make comprehension of the writing difficult at times. Sentences may be incomplete or unclear. Paragraphs may be poorly formed.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 20 pts
Structure: Formatting and Sourcing
20 to >16 pts
Advanced
Contains an accurately formatted reference page. Citations and references are fully formatted according to the current APA edition with no errors. Includes 10 peer reviewed sources and 5 biblical verses.
16 to >12 pts
Proficient
Contains an accurately formatted reference page. Citations and references are generally formatted according to the current APA edition with minor errors. At least 8 peer reviewed sources and 3 biblical verses are included.
12 to >0 pts
Developing
A reference page may not be included. There may be major errors involving citation and reference formatting, and these are generally not formatted according to the current APA edition. There are <8 peer reviewed sources and <3 biblical verses included.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 20 pts
Structure: Page Requirement
15 to >12 pts
Advanced
Paper is between 12 and 15 pages, not including title page, abstract, or references page.
12 to >9 pts
Proficient
Paper is at least 11 pages but may be >15 pages.
9 to >0 pts
Developing
Paper is <11 pages.
0 pts
Not Present
/ 15 pts
Total Points: -
Philosophy of Ethics in Research Grading Rubric
- Assignment 2: LASA 3—Instructional Functional Analysis
- haardous waste
- Fundamentals of HR Mgmt Assignment 2
- u6a1...updatws
- late paper need done asap (8-23_16)
- ACC460 Recording General Fund Operating
- michael smith 150words
- Develop a complete business case project for an idea. This may be a real example from your work environment or a fictional example from anywhere you choose. This must be 7 pages project with APA format
- Assignment 3: Twin Behavior: Intervening
- Essay
