Education Final Assignment

2

2

Smart Goals for Education Improvement Proposal Week 2

Smart Goals for Education Improvement Proposal

Introduction

Effective school improvement begins with the establishment of clear and achievable goals. SMART goals—Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound — are seen as the backbone of strategic educational planning. This proposal includes two SMART goals that aim to improve the school climate, equity, and support systems for students. It involves the consistent use of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) in school classrooms and a decrease in the number of disciplinary referrals, especially for marginalized groups of students. The objectives are in synergy with the overall mission of establishing a safe, inclusive, and high-performing learning environment for all students at the K-12 levels.

SMART Goal #1: PBIS Implementation and Consistency Across Classrooms

Implement PBIS school-wide to promote consistency in classroom management strategies across all K–12 classrooms. By May 2026, the percentage of classrooms consistently using core PBIS practices—such as setting clear expectations, establishing proactive routines, and using positive reinforcement—will increase from baseline (identified via an initial audit) to 90%..

Rationale and Relevance

Studies have demonstrated that in schools where PBIS is used rigorously, there are fewer behavior issues, better academic achievement, and more discipline equity (Simonsen et al., 2015). Uneven classroom management may be misleading to students and reinforce injustice. This aim achieves this by making all the teachers focus on a common behavioral framework, therefore, providing the students with wise counsel that is both consistent and supportive and culturally sensitive.

Implementation Strategies

First, the school will carry out a baseline audit to get to know the current PBIS practices in classrooms. According to the results, a PBIS toolkit will be compiled and disseminated. The toolkit will entail an expectation teaching lesson sample, a behavior matrix template, as well as frequency examples. Every three months, professional development will be centered around central practices in PBIS, behavioral data utilization, and culturally responsive teaching. Continuing teacher development will be facilitated by behavior specialists in the field through an in-class monthly coaching session. PBIS grade-level teams will promote collaboration, tell success stories, and problem-solve implementation challenges.

Monitoring and Evaluation

The implementation of PBIS will be monitored with the help of the Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI), which will be applied every 2 months. The teacher feedback surveys and classroom observations will allow obtaining qualitative as well as quantitative observations. The school will also monitor the behavioral referral patterns, attendance rates, and teacher response-specific feedback of PBIS in order to quantify a change in the long run.

Challenges and Opportunities

The possible barriers are diverse teacher buy-in, time restraints to PD and coaching, and logistics of gathering data. Nonetheless, the given objective has a great potential to bring the staff on a single basis, reinforce classroom culture, and establish a consistent set of behavior expectations more beneficial to all students.

SMART Goal #2: Reducing Disciplinary Referrals and Behavioural Disparities

Reduce the number of disciplinary referrals and address disparities in behavioral consequences among students of marginalized backgrounds through restorative and proactive PBIS practices. By the end of the 2025–2026 school year, overall disciplinary referrals will decrease by 30%, and racial/ethnic disparities in discipline will decline by 50%, based on disaggregated incident data.

Rationale and Relevance

The national data indicates that the racial/ethnic groups of color, especially Black and Latino students, are overrepresented when it comes to discipline, and they can be punished simply because they do nothing more than others (Gregory et al., 2017). This continues patterns of disengagement, academic failure, and poor school experiences. This is necessary if we are to enhance educational parity, suppress implicit bias, and uphold equality and dignity for all students.

Implementation Strategies

At the start of the implementation phase, an equity audit will be done to determine discipline trends and gaps. Sections of results will guide specific professional learning in culturally responsive classroom management and restorative justice. Every quarter, employees will undergo the training devoted to such aspects as implicit biases, equitable discipline, and relationship building with students. Equity liaisons and discipline equity teams will also be established to assist teachers and monitor the data trends. Also, the school will collaborate with families and the community-based organizations that will augment the behavioral interventions outside the classroom.

Monitoring and Evaluation

Data on discipline will also be disaggregated quarterly on the basis of race and gender, plus special education status. Changes in instructional and disciplinary practices will be captured in the teacher coaching logs and self-assessment reflections, as well as in the comments of peer learning groups. An annual comparison between the rate of suspension and expulsion received will be made by the school to measure the effect. The evaluation process will also be guided by student focus groups and feedback from parents.

Challenges and Opportunities

The unwillingness to change pre-existing disciplinary behavior or to raise the issue of equity may be an impediment. Nevertheless, this is an essential goal since it is a chance to change the school culture, minimize prejudice, and empower marginalized voices. Real change can be realized with the characteristics of strong leadership, communication, and accountability.

Conclusion

The following SMART goals cover urgent demands of the school system: consistency in behavioral expectations and betterment of unfair disciplining practices. These aspirations can have a sustainable effect on school climate and student achievement through the means of focused training, data-based monitoring, and collaborative implementation. Following the mission of the school, that is based on equity, inclusivity, and excellence, they will make the learning process safer and support the needs of all students.

References

Gregory, A., Skiba, R. J., & Mediratta, K. (2017). Eliminating disparities in school discipline: A framework for intervention. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 253–278. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X17690499

Ohio Department of Education. (n.d.). Ohio improvement process. Retrieved from https://education.ohio.gov/Topics/District-and-School-Continuous-Improvement/Ohio- Improvement-Process-OIP

Simonsen, B., Freeman, J., Sugai, G., Dooley, K., & Putnam, R. (2015). Fidelity of implementation within a multi-tiered system of support (MTSS): Focusing on classroom support. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 59(3), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2015.0009

Thoughtful Learning. (2016). Tips on how to write a SMART goal [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-SvuFIQjK8

2

2

Methods Analysis Assignment Week 4

Methods Analysis Assignment

In education, improving student behavior and addressing different levels of discipline in schools is very important. There have been several real-life examples of how behavioral expectations and differences in disciplinary methods can impact student performance, especially for students of color and those with special needs, over the years. Considering these issues, this research paper aims to implement Positive Behavior in classroom management.

To ensure that this project would be evidence-based and demonstrate measurable results, thorough research had to be conducted about the sources of data that would help shape the project and track its progress. This methodology will explain how the sources were selected and reviewed, the rationale for using them, and how they relate directly to the project objectives.

The first objective is quite simple; it is all about consistency: wanting to see at least 90% of the classrooms in my school consistently using core PBIS practices by May 2026. This will also be monitored using regular schoolwide audits and surveys of teachers whose identities are not disclosed. The second objective is equity: I hope that by the end of the 2025-2026 school year, there will be a 30 percent decrease in the total number of disciplinary referrals and a 50 percent decrease in racial and ethnical disparities of discipline. They are not merely wishful objectives but will be researched, data-driven, and will have data at every phase.

To help achieve these objectives, different secondary data sources were used: peer-reviewed journal articles, national PBIS frameworks, and reports of trends in school discipline. Each of these choices was highly specific, emphasizing their credibility and timeliness, but also on how related they are to the fundamental principles of PBIS and my school's equity-oriented mission.

The sources are categorized into three: empirical studies demonstrating the outcomes of PBIS implementation, frameworks of successful implementation, and studies concentrating on school discipline disparities. For example, Gregory, Skiba, and Mediratta's (2017) article is quite insightful. Their contributions were fundamental to the racial imbalance in school discipline and how PBIS offers solutions to this problem. The article draws on national data and various case studies, which is why it is comprehensive and applicable. The fact that it tied PBIS implementation with broader equity reforms was the most important section because it relates to the second SMART goal.

Hannigan and Hannigan (2020) also provided another important source as they presented the idea of the PBIS Champion Model. The model decomposes, measurable benchmarks in PBIS practices into three levels of support. This was helpful, especially when working on the first SMART goal, which concerned implementation consistency. They have an evidence-based model that contains fidelity tools and staff, students, and family engagement strategies. This model has been published in an authoritative journal of school leadership whose contents are germane to my objectives; hence, this gives me a sense of security in terms of reliability.

Pas et al. (2019) provided even more insights into the analysis. They conducted a longitudinal study on how PBIS fidelity affects academic and behavioral results. Their application of mediation analysis attracted attention when they demonstrated how staff training, leadership support, and standard application impacted student success. Their evidence supported the notion that it was necessary to consider implementing PBIS at the surface level as well, incorporate it into the school culture, and maintain support long-term.

Furthermore, there is the work of Simonsen et al. (2015), who propose a schoolwide model that incorporates behavior and academic support. They focus on sustainability based on well-defined structures, training, and constant monitoring. Their implementation checklists and coaching approaches proved to be the most valuable. This helps to define how to carry out the audits and collect the teachers' feedback. Their work was also justified as representatives of the University of Connecticut and the Center on PBIS.

Tyre and Feuerborn (2021) wrote an article that highlighted some challenges in implementing PBIS. They analyze typical challenges of PBIS implementation: staff burnout, poor leadership buy-in, and poor accountability. Early identification of these risks will help establish a sustainability plan that can be used to coach the team continually and share the leadership roles.

All these sources can play a unique role in helping to achieve the two SMART goals. The Hannigan and Simonsen modules of baseline audit and PD modules need to be utilized to enhance implementation fidelity. The research by Pas et al. promotes professional learning and demonstrates the influence of the quality of implementation on student achievements. Concerning the demarcation of disciplinary disparities, Gregory et al. and Tyre & Feuerborn provide theory-based, practice-based, equity-based approaches to disciplinary disparities using real-life scenarios of schools.

The sources also share some qualities that increase their credibility. They are all peer-reviewed, and their authors are experts in educational leadership, behavioral support, or equity. The majority use a large number of datasets or longitudinal data to conclude their findings, which makes them valid. Notably, their conclusions can be immediately applied to schools' current world problems and challenges.

Some other factors that had to be considered to determine whether these sources were valid and reliable were as follows. The former was content fitting: each article focuses on either PBIS implementation, outcomes, or discipline equity—this close association with the project's objectives augurs content validity well. Furthermore, many are based on existing PBIS models or employ documents like the SWPBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory, confirming their construct validity.

Another attribute that these sources excel in is reliability. Strict statistical study methods, multi-site research, and the tested implementation frameworks strengthen their findings. To illustrate, Pas et al. have administered data over various years and school locations, contributing to the strength of generalizability. Simonsen et al. applied verified assessment tools that have become highly used by PBIS schools nationwide. Such an agreement will allow findings to be replicated and provide confidence.

These data sources will be incorporated into the suggested PBIS plan. The PBIS Champion Model and the tools used by Simonsen will serve as the templates for the school audit and the staff self-assessments. The results of the research by Pas will influence the direction and content of further professional growth, so that the focus is not only on talking about the attitude but also mastering skills. The work presented by Gregory will inform policy review and help to evaluate the existing disciplinary procedures using an equity lens. The insights of Tyre & Feuerborn will come in handy during the design of a rollout strategy and coaching strategy that should foresee and counteract the feelings of implementation fatigue or resistance.

There is nothing wrong with using secondary data, but it also has limits. Most of the studies are based on data collected at the national or regional level, so they might not depict the special features of my school or district. To overcome this, researchers should augment these statistics with some localized data from local audits and disciplinary records of the chosen school. Another limitation is that the studies do not provide disaggregate data according to race, gender, or the status of disabilities. Therefore, the current project will require the use and analysis of school-level disaggregated data to monitor disparities with greater accuracy. Other challenges may include the need to comply with FERPA in case of student-level data analysis, or an insufficient number of personnel in an attempt to coach and guide concurrent practice.

References

Gregory, A., Skiba, R. J., & Mediratta, K. (2017). Eliminating disparities in school discipline: A framework for intervention. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 253–278. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X17690499

Hannigan, J. D., & Hannigan, J. (2020). Best practice PBIS implementation: Evidence indicators in each tier of the PBIS champion model. Journal of School Administration Research and Development, 5(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.32674/jsard.v5i1.2111

OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. (2021).

Positive behavioral interventions and supports implementation blueprint. https://www.pbis.org/resource/pbis-implementation-blueprint

Pas, E. T., Waasdorp, T. E., Bradshaw, C. P., & Ialongo, N. S. (2019). The impact of PBIS fidelity on student outcomes: Examining school-level mediators. Prevention Science, 20(7), 1043–1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-01017-8

Simonsen, B., Freeman, J., Sugai, G., Dooley, K., & Flannery, K. B. (2015). A schoolwide model for service delivery: Redefining and reorganizing academic and behavior supports. Teaching Exceptional Children, 47(6), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059915580030

Tyre, A. D., & Feuerborn, L. L. (2021). The top 10 implementation pitfalls of schoolwide PBIS: Recommendations for sustainable change. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 65(2), 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2020.1817686

U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2020). Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC): School discipline reports. https://ocrdata.ed.gov