Education CLC PPT Assignment

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 1 of 9about:srcdoc

CLC - Ethics in the Changing Health Care Environment Presentation -

Rubric

Chosen Area of Health Care Research 11 points

Criteria Description

Chosen Area of Health Care Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly identifies and explains a specific area of

health care research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly identifies and explains a specific area of health care

research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation identifies and explains a specific area of health care research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely identifies and explains a specific area of health care

research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately identify or explain a specific area of health

care research.

Collapse All

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 2 of 9about:srcdoc

Potential Ethical Issues in the Chosen Area of Health Care Research 11 points

Criteria Description

Potential Ethical Issues in the Chosen Area of Health Care Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly examines potential ethical issues

associated with the chosen area of health care research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly examines potential ethical issues associated with the

chosen area of health care research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation examines potential ethical issues associated with the chosen

area of health care research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely examines potential ethical issues associated with the

chosen area of health care research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately examine potential ethical issues associated

with the chosen area of health care research.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 3 of 9about:srcdoc

Clinical Research and the IRB When Completing Research 11 points

Criteria Description

Clinical Research and the IRB When Completing Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly discusses the importance of clinical

research and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly discusses the importance of clinical research and the

Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation discusses the importance of clinical research and the

Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely discusses the importance of clinical research and the

Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately discuss the importance of clinical research

and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 4 of 9about:srcdoc

Ethical Issues of Current and Developing Technology in Health Care Research

11 points

Criteria Description

Ethical Issues of Current and Developing Technology in Health Care Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly explores potential ethical issues

surrounding the use of current and developing technology in health care

research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly explores potential ethical issues surrounding the use

of current and developing technology in health care research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation explores potential ethical issues surrounding the use of current

and developing technology in health care research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely explores potential ethical issues surrounding the use of

current and developing technology in health care research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately explore potential ethical issues surrounding

the use of current and developing technology in health care research.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 5 of 9about:srcdoc

Presentation of Content 33 points

Criteria Description

Presentation of Content

5. Excellent 33 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and

relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced

organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Good 28.05 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting

information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes

persuasive information from reliable sources.

3. Satisfactory 24.75 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some

inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

2. Less than Satisfactory 21.45 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong

sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information.

Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 6 of 9about:srcdoc

Layout 11 points

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Excellent 11 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with

appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is

appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The

background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

4. Good 9.35 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the

content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies

appropriately for headings and text.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes

the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold,

long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance

readability.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or

distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall

readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts,

dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations

of text.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and

subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read

with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate

contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold

formatting is evident.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 7 of 9about:srcdoc

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

11 points

Criteria Description

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word

choice, etc.)

5. Excellent 11 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and

word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose,

discipline, and scope.

4. Good 9.35 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate

vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to

communicate clearly.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice

are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech

appropriately.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident.

Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates

writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 8 of 9about:srcdoc

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent 5.5 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good 4.68 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

3. Satisfactory 4.13 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly

distracting to the reader.

2. Less than Satisfactory 3.58 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of

meaning.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 9 of 9about:srcdoc

Documentation of Sources 5.5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as

appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent 5.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to

assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good 4.68 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format

is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory 4.13 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although

some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less than Satisfactory 3.58 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to

assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total 110 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 1 of 9about:srcdoc

CLC - Ethics in the Changing Health Care Environment Presentation -

Rubric

Chosen Area of Health Care Research 11 points

Criteria Description

Chosen Area of Health Care Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly identifies and explains a specific area of

health care research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly identifies and explains a specific area of health care

research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation identifies and explains a specific area of health care research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely identifies and explains a specific area of health care

research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately identify or explain a specific area of health

care research.

Collapse All

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 2 of 9about:srcdoc

Potential Ethical Issues in the Chosen Area of Health Care Research 11 points

Criteria Description

Potential Ethical Issues in the Chosen Area of Health Care Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly examines potential ethical issues

associated with the chosen area of health care research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly examines potential ethical issues associated with the

chosen area of health care research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation examines potential ethical issues associated with the chosen

area of health care research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely examines potential ethical issues associated with the

chosen area of health care research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately examine potential ethical issues associated

with the chosen area of health care research.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 3 of 9about:srcdoc

Clinical Research and the IRB When Completing Research 11 points

Criteria Description

Clinical Research and the IRB When Completing Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly discusses the importance of clinical

research and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly discusses the importance of clinical research and the

Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation discusses the importance of clinical research and the

Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely discusses the importance of clinical research and the

Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately discuss the importance of clinical research

and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when completing research.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 4 of 9about:srcdoc

Ethical Issues of Current and Developing Technology in Health Care Research

11 points

Criteria Description

Ethical Issues of Current and Developing Technology in Health Care Research

5. Excellent 11 points

Presentation clearly and thoroughly explores potential ethical issues

surrounding the use of current and developing technology in health care

research.

4. Good 9.35 points

Presentation thoroughly explores potential ethical issues surrounding the use

of current and developing technology in health care research.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Presentation explores potential ethical issues surrounding the use of current

and developing technology in health care research.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Presentation vaguely explores potential ethical issues surrounding the use of

current and developing technology in health care research.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Presentation does not adequately explore potential ethical issues surrounding

the use of current and developing technology in health care research.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 5 of 9about:srcdoc

Presentation of Content 33 points

Criteria Description

Presentation of Content

5. Excellent 33 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and

relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced

organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Good 28.05 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting

information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes

persuasive information from reliable sources.

3. Satisfactory 24.75 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some

inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

2. Less than Satisfactory 21.45 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong

sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information.

Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 6 of 9about:srcdoc

Layout 11 points

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Excellent 11 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with

appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is

appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The

background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

4. Good 9.35 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the

content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies

appropriately for headings and text.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes

the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold,

long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance

readability.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or

distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall

readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts,

dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations

of text.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and

subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read

with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate

contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold

formatting is evident.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 7 of 9about:srcdoc

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

11 points

Criteria Description

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word

choice, etc.)

5. Excellent 11 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and

word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose,

discipline, and scope.

4. Good 9.35 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate

vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to

communicate clearly.

3. Satisfactory 8.25 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

2. Less than Satisfactory 7.15 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice

are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech

appropriately.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident.

Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates

writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 8 of 9about:srcdoc

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent 5.5 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good 4.68 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

3. Satisfactory 4.13 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly

distracting to the reader.

2. Less than Satisfactory 3.58 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of

meaning.

5/8/25, 5:53 PM

Page 9 of 9about:srcdoc

Documentation of Sources 5.5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as

appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent 5.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to

assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good 4.68 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format

is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory 4.13 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although

some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less than Satisfactory 3.58 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to

assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total 110 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.