Education 6.3 Assignment: Change Communication Gone Wrong
karenrayne
3 years ago
20
files (4)6.3AssignmentChangeCommunicationGoneWrong.html.zip
6.2DiscussionCreateYourOwnParable.html.zip
PreviewRubric_6.2Discussion100points-4SU2023CommunicationAsLeadersLDR-415-01A-IndianaWesleyanUniversity.pdf
PreviewRubric_6.3Assignment135points-4SU2023CommunicationAsLeadersLDR-415-01A-IndianaWesleyanUniversity.pdf
6.3AssignmentChangeCommunicationGoneWrong.html.zip
6.3 Assignment Change Communication Gone Wrong.html
Getting Started
In this assignment, you will relate concepts you have learned from the course text to a real-world experience. To do so, you will write a verbatim. A verbatim is a summary account of an experience in which you participated. Writing down the experience provides you the opportunity to examine the event and learn from the positive and negative communication dynamics that occurred. The verbatim creates an opportunity for you to view the event from multiple perspectives.
Your verbatim will describe a time in which your leader or organization instituted a change and your analysis of that experience. Using resources from this course and previous courses, address what went right, what went wrong, and how it could have gone better. This is a chance for you to pull multiple tools from your leadership toolkit built up over the program and use them together.
Upon successful completion of this assignment, you will be able to:
- Critique a previous change initiative using select knowledge and skills gained through the BSOL program.
Instructions
- Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
- The paper must be 5-7 pages in length.
- The paper should have a minimum of seven different sources cited.
- Compose a verbatim in which you address the following:
- Explain the change your leader or organization was implementing.
- Use the Introduction to Communications videos from Workshop One and identify communication principles that were appropriately addressed and ones that were not addressed well (for example, maybe there was too much “noise” around the announcement).
- Using Crucial Conversations, state the identified communication principles that were appropriately addressed and ones that were not addressed well (for example, did the leader or organization make it safe for employees to discuss the change and its implications).
- Did the communication about the change take into account personal communication styles, intergenerational communication, or cross-cultural communication principles?
- What Biblical principle have you learned from this course that could have helped this communication effort be more effective?
- Referring back to LDR-385, the course on teams, what team dynamics were at play at the time of the change announcement? How were these addressed (or not?).
- Referring back to LDR-410, did the communication effort around this change effectively cast vision for the change effort?
- Using all you have learned thus far, provide a best-case scenario for how this change effort could have been communicated.
- Submit your verbatim by Day 7 of the workshop.
Review the associated rubric
Access the assignment submission page
File_e0fos28eb0ceegvzkynskzii8vdkvhs300134686957.jpg
6.2DiscussionCreateYourOwnParable.html.zip
6.2 Discussion Create Your Own Parable.html
Getting Started
Throughout this course, you have read the parables of Jesus. You have also read two books written in a fable/parable style. In LDR-385 you read the fable The Five Dysfunctions of a Team. Using what you have learned from reading these biblical and modern-day parables, construct your own parable designed to communicate an important leadership or organizational principle.
Begin by deciding the principle you want to communicate. You could pull from LDR-410 and communicate about the use of wisdom or about a particular value. You could pull from LDR-405 and create a parable designed to demonstrate the importance of developing others as leaders. You could pull from LDR-385 and design a parable to communicate a specific team leadership principle. We will not list every previous class you have had, but the point has been made: you have previous courses and resources you could draw on to determine your parable’s topic.
You could also consider a particular issue you are having at your organization and create a parable to use in addressing it. Maybe a particular employee does not understand how disruptive their behavior is and previous attempts have not gotten through. You could use a parable to address that. This is just an example and it is likely that each of you has an issue at work you wish could be addressed. These are all fair game as options for your parable.
It is recommended that you test out the parable on several different people before you turn in your final version. Each time you tell the parable, you can ask the listener what principle they took away. If they are not taking away from it what you are hoping they take away, then you need to edit the parable. You can also ask them if the parable was compelling – once you started, did they want to hear the rest? Did it hold their attention? Was it too short or too long?
This should not be something you try to create the night before it is due. This is something you need to draft, edit, tell, receive feedback, edit again, retell, receive feedback, and so on until you think it is a story that is effective.
Upon successful completion of this discussion, you will be able to:
- Construct a new parable design to communicate an important leadership or organizational principle.
Instructions
- Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
- Create an original parable to address a topic you have learned about while in the Organizational Leadership program at IWU.
- Whatever your topic, make sure it is clear. Do not try and address multiple topics or issues.
- You may turn in a written parable or you may record yourself telling the parable. Try for something that, if you read it out loud, would be in the 3-4 minutes range. Whether you write it or record yourself:
- You must begin by clearly communicating what your topic is and why you are addressing it. If it is a value or team leadership principle, what is it specifically and why is it important to address in your organization at this time.
- Then tell the parable.
- Post your parable by the end of Day 4 of the workshop.
- You must respond to at least two of your peer’s submissions explaining what you thought they did well in their parable by the end of Day 7 of the workshop.
Review the associated rubric
Access the discussion topic page
images/6.2.jpeg
PreviewRubric_6.2Discussion100points-4SU2023CommunicationAsLeadersLDR-415-01A-IndianaWesleyanUniversity.pdf
6.2 Discussion (100 points) Course: 4SU2023 Communication As Leaders (LDR-415-01A)
Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement Inadequate/Failing Criterion Score
Quality of
Content
/ 4040 points
Thoroughly
addresses the
prompt(s).
Clearly
demonstrates
understanding of
relevant course
concepts.
Provides clear
evidence of critical
thinking.
36 points
Adequately
addresses the
prompt(s).
Demonstrates a
basic understanding
of relevant course
concepts.
Provides some
evidence of critical
thinking.
33 points
Partially address the
prompt(s) or
addresses only
some of the
prompts.
Demonstrates a
limited
understanding of
relevant course
concepts.
Provides limited
evidence of critical
thinking.
30 points
Minimally addresses
or does not address
the prompt(s).
Does not
adequately
demonstrate an
understanding of
relevant course
concepts or provide
evidence of critical
thinking.
Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement Inadequate/Failing Criterion Score
Communication / 25
Organization / 25
25 points
Written or recorded
is communication
clear.
Communicates
clearly through the
effective control of
grammar and
spelling.
22 points
Written or recorded
communication is
readable.
Communicates
clearly through the
control of grammar
and spelling, with
only minimal errors.
20 points
Written or recorded
communication is
not as clear due to a
few issues with the
effective control of
grammar and
spelling.
19 points
No communication
or written or
recorded
communication is
not as clear due to
many issues with
the effective control
of grammar and
spelling.
25 points
The parable is
carefully and
logically organized
with an
introduction, body,
and conclusion that
clearly identifies the
key points.
22 points
The parable is well
organized and
explains key points.
20 points
The parable has
organizational
issues that
sometimes make it
difficult to follow
the key points.
19 points
The parable is
poorly organized
and key points are
missing or difficult
to identify.
Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement Inadequate/Failing Criterion Score
Quality
Interaction
/ 55 points
Demonstrates high-
level critical
thinking through
interaction with at
least two
classmates that
advances the
discussion,
introducing new
ideas, asking
clarifying questions,
and synthesizing
concepts.
4 points
Demonstrates
critical thinking
through interaction
with two classmates
by directly
commenting on
their ideas and
making connections
to relevant content
that marginally
advances the
discussion,
introducing ideas,
asking questions.
3 points
Demonstrates
minimal critical
thinking. Interaction
is incomplete or
lacking in response
quality and/or
quantity.
2 points
Interaction is
insufficient.
Total / 100
Overall Score
Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement Inadequate/Failing Criterion Score
Timely
Engagement
/ 55 points
Initial
communication is
on time.
Actively interacts in
discussion by
responding to two
classmates on two
or more different
days.
4 points
Initial
communication is
on time.
Actively interacts in
discussion by
responding to two
classmates on two
different days.
3 points
Initial
communication is
on time but
responds to only
one peer and/or on
one day only.
OR
Initial
communication is
late and responds to
only one peer
and/or on one day
only.
2 points
Initial
communication is
late.
Demonstrates no
responses to peers.
Excellent 92 points minimum
Competent 82 points minimum
Needs Improvement 72 points minimum
Inadequate/Failing 0 points minimum
PreviewRubric_6.3Assignment135points-4SU2023CommunicationAsLeadersLDR-415-01A-IndianaWesleyanUniversity.pdf
6.3 Assignment (135 points) Course: 4SU2023 Communication As Leaders (LDR-415-01A)
Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement
Inadequate/Faili ng
Criterion Score
Quality of
Content
/ 9090 points
Thoroughly
addresses the
prompt(s).
Clearly
demonstrates
understanding
of relevant
course
concepts using
course
materials and
additional
resources (with
citations and
references).
Provides clear
evidence of
critical
thinking.
83 points
Adequately
addresses the
prompt(s).
Demonstrates
a basic
understanding
of relevant
course
concepts using
course
materials and
additional
resources (with
citations and
references).
Provides some
evidence of
critical
thinking.
77 points
Partially
address the
prompt(s) or
addresses only
some of the
prompts.
Demonstrates
a limited
understanding
of relevant
course
concepts using
course
materials and
additional
resources (with
citations and
references).
Provides
limited
evidence of
critical
thinking.
73 points
Minimally
addresses or
does not
address the
prompt(s).
Does not
adequately
demonstrate
an
understanding
of relevant
course
concepts or
provide
evidence of
critical
thinking.
Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement
Inadequate/Faili ng
Criterion Score
Written
Communicati
on
/ 25
Organization / 10
25 points
Written
communication
is easy to read
and
understand.
Communicates
clearly through
the effective
control of
grammar and
spelling.
23 points
Written
communication
is readable.
Communicates
clearly through
the control of
grammar and
spelling, with
only minimal
errors.
21 points
Written
communication
is not as clear
due to a few
issues with the
effective
control of
grammar and
spelling.
19 points
No
communication
or written
communication
is not as clear
due to many
issues with the
effective
control of
grammar and
spelling.
10 points
Paper is
carefully and
logically
organized with
an
introduction,
body, and
conclusion that
clearly
identifies the
key points.
8 points
Paper is well
organized and
explains key
points.
6 points
Paper has
organizational
issues that
sometimes
make it
difficult to
follow the key
points.
4 points
Paper is poorly
organized and
key points are
missing or
difficult to
identify.
Total / 135
Overall Score
Criteria Excellent Competent Needs Improvement
Inadequate/Faili ng
Criterion Score
APA
Formatting
/ 1010 points
Paper is
formatted
according to
APA style.
Source
citations and
references are
used correctly
and follow APA
form & style.
8 points
Paper is
formatted
according to
APA style.
Source
citations and
references are
used correctly
and most
follow APA
form & style.
6 points
Paper is
formatted
according to
APA style, with
some errors.
Some source
citations and
references are
missing and/or
do not follow
APA form &
style.
4 points
Paper is not
correctly
formatted
according to
APA style.
Source
citations and
references are
not used
correctly and
do not follow
APA form &
style.
Excellent 125 points minimum
Competent 111 points minimum
Needs Improvement 98 points minimum
Inadequate/Failing 0 points minimum
6.3AssignmentChangeCommunicationGoneWrong.html.zip
6.3 Assignment Change Communication Gone Wrong.html
Getting Started
In this assignment, you will relate concepts you have learned from the course text to a real-world experience. To do so, you will write a verbatim. A verbatim is a summary account of an experience in which you participated. Writing down the experience provides you the opportunity to examine the event and learn from the positive and negative communication dynamics that occurred. The verbatim creates an opportunity for you to view the event from multiple perspectives.
Your verbatim will describe a time in which your leader or organization instituted a change and your analysis of that experience. Using resources from this course and previous courses, address what went right, what went wrong, and how it could have gone better. This is a chance for you to pull multiple tools from your leadership toolkit built up over the program and use them together.
Upon successful completion of this assignment, you will be able to:
- Critique a previous change initiative using select knowledge and skills gained through the BSOL program.
Instructions
- Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
- The paper must be 5-7 pages in length.
- The paper should have a minimum of seven different sources cited.
- Compose a verbatim in which you address the following:
- Explain the change your leader or organization was implementing.
- Use the Introduction to Communications videos from Workshop One and identify communication principles that were appropriately addressed and ones that were not addressed well (for example, maybe there was too much “noise” around the announcement).
- Using Crucial Conversations, state the identified communication principles that were appropriately addressed and ones that were not addressed well (for example, did the leader or organization make it safe for employees to discuss the change and its implications).
- Did the communication about the change take into account personal communication styles, intergenerational communication, or cross-cultural communication principles?
- What Biblical principle have you learned from this course that could have helped this communication effort be more effective?
- Referring back to LDR-385, the course on teams, what team dynamics were at play at the time of the change announcement? How were these addressed (or not?).
- Referring back to LDR-410, did the communication effort around this change effectively cast vision for the change effort?
- Using all you have learned thus far, provide a best-case scenario for how this change effort could have been communicated.
- Submit your verbatim by Day 7 of the workshop.
Review the associated rubric
Access the assignment submission page
File_e0fos28eb0ceegvzkynskzii8vdkvhs300134686957.jpg
- Read the text and answer several questions.
- International Financial Markets and Institutions. Banking Modules.
- Security Needs and Objectives Paper
- Unit VIII Power Point Marketing plan final
- for rey writer only! english help
- Task 1 (1100 words) Analysis of the environmental impacts of Samsung smartphone Task 2 (1250 Words) Discuss how the environmental impacts can be mitigated Conclusion 400 words • Summarise the environmental impacts and how they could be alleviated
- Using Spotify (https://www.spotify.com) as a case company, prepare a report that: 1. Identifies a potentially attractive target market for the company’s future international expansion strategy. You will be provided with 3 specific countries to choose fro
- 6d
- Week Two
- Asst
