Due 11/2..

Wahonda7

Main

Home >Homework Answsers >Nursing homework help

APA ontime

see attached

2 years ago
02.11.2024
15

Report issue

files (3)

22.docx
CriticalAppraisalQuantitativeResearchReportRubric6.9-12.docx
HandHygieneCriticalAppraisal.pdf

22.docx

Before beginning the critical appraisal of the attached article, thoroughly review Chapter 8 of your textbook. Familiarize yourself with the techniques and criteria for critically appraising quantitative research designs. Pay particular attention to the key components such as research questions, methodology, sampling techniques, data collection methods, statistical analysis, and interpretation of results.

You will then carefully read the article provided below for this assignment and utilize the template provided for the critical appraisal. This template will guide you through evaluating the various components of the research article. For each section of the template, provide your assessment and rationale based on the article's content. If any component is missing or unclear in the article, indicate so in your response. Ensure that you answer each question in the template and provide a rationale.

Note on Missing Components: It is common for research articles to have limitations or areas where key components are not clearly identified. If you see this in the article, note it in your appraisal. Acknowledging missing or unclear pieces is an important aspect of a critical appraisal.

Please review the attached article, template, and the rubric.

Criteria

Excellent

Proficient

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Initial Post- Timing

3 points

Post initial post by 11:59pm CST on Wednesday of the week due

3 points

Post initial response by 11:59pm CST on Thursday of the week due

2 points

Post initial post by 11:59pm CST on Friday of the week due

1 point

Post initial response after Friday of the week due

0 points

Initial Post- Word Count

3 points

Post contains a minimum of 200 words

3 points

Post contains 150-199 words

2 points

Post contains 100-149 words

1 point

Post contains less than 100 words

0 points

Initial Post- Content

3 points

Initial posting fully addresses ALL aspects of the discussion. Information is factually correct, reflective and substantive contribution which advances the discussion.

3 points

Initial posting adequately addresses all aspects of the discussion. Information is factually correct, but lacks full development of concepts in the discussion.

2 points

Initial posting loosely addresses all aspects of the discussion and does not add substantive information to the discussion.

1 point

Does not post an initial post or initial posting contains uncivil or inappropriate content.

0 points

Initial Post- Reference

3 points

Uses at least 1 current (within the last 5 years), peer reviewed nursing journal or the course textbook for the initial post.

Reference must be different from the other two posts

3 points

Uses a current (within 5 years, peer reviewed journal other than nursing

2 points

Uses nursing focused information from a reputable website but not a journal or journal is greater than 5 years old.

1 point

Does not include a reference.

0 points

CriticalAppraisalQuantitativeResearchReportRubric6.9-12.docx

Critical Appraisal Quantitative Research Report Rubric

Criteria

Excellent

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Template is used to complete the assignment

2 points

Template is used.

(2 points)

Template is not used

(0 points)

Uses the correct article for the critical appraisal

2 points

Correct article used

(2 points)

Incorrect article used

(0 points)

Title page

2 points

Free of errors on title page and including:

Title of Paper

Institution: Arkansas State University

Student Name

Course #,

Title of Paper

Date

(2 points)

Errors on title page or no title page

(0 points)

Reference page

6 points

Reference page included with no errors

(6 points)

Reference page included with 1-3 errors

(3 points)

Reference page included with 4 or more errors or reference page not included

(0 points)

Title, Abstract, Introduction/Statement of the Problem

4 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(4 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(2 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

Hypothesis or research questions/Literature Review

6 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(6 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(3 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

Conceptual/Theoretical Framework/ Method

Protection of Human Rights

6 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(6 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(3 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

Research Design/Population and Sample/Data Collection and Measurement

6 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(6 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(3 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

Procedures/Results/Data Analysis/Findings

6 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(6 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(3 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

Discussion

Interpretation of the findings/Implications & Recommendations

6 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(6 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(3 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

General Organization/Credibility/

Summary Assessment

6 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(6 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(3 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

Recommendations

4 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(4 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(2 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

Mechanics

4 points

Free of errors in grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling

(4 points)

1-4 errors in grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling.

(2 points)

5 or more errors in grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling.

(0 points)

22.docx

Please review the attached article, template, and the rubric.

Criteria

Excellent

Proficient

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Initial Post- Timing

3 points

Post initial post by 11:59pm CST on Wednesday of the week due

3 points

Post initial response by 11:59pm CST on Thursday of the week due

2 points

Post initial post by 11:59pm CST on Friday of the week due

1 point

Post initial response after Friday of the week due

0 points

Initial Post- Word Count

3 points

Post contains a minimum of 200 words

3 points

Post contains 150-199 words

2 points

Post contains 100-149 words

1 point

Post contains less than 100 words

0 points

Initial Post- Content

3 points

Initial posting fully addresses ALL aspects of the discussion. Information is factually correct, reflective and substantive contribution which advances the discussion.

3 points

Initial posting adequately addresses all aspects of the discussion. Information is factually correct, but lacks full development of concepts in the discussion.

2 points

Initial posting loosely addresses all aspects of the discussion and does not add substantive information to the discussion.

1 point

Does not post an initial post or initial posting contains uncivil or inappropriate content.

0 points

Initial Post- Reference

3 points

Uses at least 1 current (within the last 5 years), peer reviewed nursing journal or the course textbook for the initial post.

Reference must be different from the other two posts

3 points

Uses a current (within 5 years, peer reviewed journal other than nursing

2 points

Uses nursing focused information from a reputable website but not a journal or journal is greater than 5 years old.

1 point

Does not include a reference.

0 points

CriticalAppraisalQuantitativeResearchReportRubric6.9-12.docx

Critical Appraisal Quantitative Research Report Rubric

Criteria

Excellent

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Template is used to complete the assignment

2 points

Template is used.

(2 points)

Template is not used

(0 points)

Uses the correct article for the critical appraisal

2 points

Correct article used

(2 points)

Incorrect article used

(0 points)

Title page

2 points

Free of errors on title page and including:

Title of Paper

Institution: Arkansas State University

Student Name

Course #,

Title of Paper

Date

(2 points)

Errors on title page or no title page

(0 points)

Reference page

6 points

Reference page included with no errors

(6 points)

Reference page included with 1-3 errors

(3 points)

Reference page included with 4 or more errors or reference page not included

(0 points)

Title, Abstract, Introduction/Statement of the Problem

4 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(4 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(2 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

Hypothesis or research questions/Literature Review

6 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(6 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(3 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

Conceptual/Theoretical Framework/ Method

Protection of Human Rights

6 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(6 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(3 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

Research Design/Population and Sample/Data Collection and Measurement

6 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(6 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(3 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

Procedures/Results/Data Analysis/Findings

6 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(6 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(3 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

Discussion

Interpretation of the findings/Implications & Recommendations

6 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(6 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(3 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

General Organization/Credibility/

Summary Assessment

6 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(6 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(3 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

Recommendations

4 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(4 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(2 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

Mechanics

4 points

Free of errors in grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling

(4 points)

1-4 errors in grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling.

(2 points)

5 or more errors in grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling.

(0 points)

22.docx

Please review the attached article, template, and the rubric.

Criteria

Excellent

Proficient

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Initial Post- Timing

3 points

Post initial post by 11:59pm CST on Wednesday of the week due

3 points

Post initial response by 11:59pm CST on Thursday of the week due

2 points

Post initial post by 11:59pm CST on Friday of the week due

1 point

Post initial response after Friday of the week due

0 points

Initial Post- Word Count

3 points

Post contains a minimum of 200 words

3 points

Post contains 150-199 words

2 points

Post contains 100-149 words

1 point

Post contains less than 100 words

0 points

Initial Post- Content

3 points

Initial posting fully addresses ALL aspects of the discussion. Information is factually correct, reflective and substantive contribution which advances the discussion.

3 points

Initial posting adequately addresses all aspects of the discussion. Information is factually correct, but lacks full development of concepts in the discussion.

2 points

Initial posting loosely addresses all aspects of the discussion and does not add substantive information to the discussion.

1 point

Does not post an initial post or initial posting contains uncivil or inappropriate content.

0 points

Initial Post- Reference

3 points

Uses at least 1 current (within the last 5 years), peer reviewed nursing journal or the course textbook for the initial post.

Reference must be different from the other two posts

3 points

Uses a current (within 5 years, peer reviewed journal other than nursing

2 points

Uses nursing focused information from a reputable website but not a journal or journal is greater than 5 years old.

1 point

Does not include a reference.

0 points

CriticalAppraisalQuantitativeResearchReportRubric6.9-12.docx

Critical Appraisal Quantitative Research Report Rubric

Criteria

Excellent

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Template is used to complete the assignment

2 points

Template is used.

(2 points)

Template is not used

(0 points)

Uses the correct article for the critical appraisal

2 points

Correct article used

(2 points)

Incorrect article used

(0 points)

Title page

2 points

Free of errors on title page and including:

Title of Paper

Institution: Arkansas State University

Student Name

Course #,

Title of Paper

Date

(2 points)

Errors on title page or no title page

(0 points)

Reference page

6 points

Reference page included with no errors

(6 points)

Reference page included with 1-3 errors

(3 points)

Reference page included with 4 or more errors or reference page not included

(0 points)

Title, Abstract, Introduction/Statement of the Problem

4 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(4 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(2 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

Hypothesis or research questions/Literature Review

6 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(6 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(3 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

Conceptual/Theoretical Framework/ Method

Protection of Human Rights

6 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(6 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(3 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

Research Design/Population and Sample/Data Collection and Measurement

6 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(6 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(3 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

Procedures/Results/Data Analysis/Findings

6 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(6 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(3 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

Discussion

Interpretation of the findings/Implications & Recommendations

6 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(6 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(3 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

General Organization/Credibility/

Summary Assessment

6 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(6 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(3 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

Recommendations

4 points

All questions addressed with specific examples provided from article.

(4 points)

1-2 Questions not answered, or missing specific examples from the article.

(2 points)

3 or more questions not answered, or examples are not provided.

(0 points)

Mechanics

4 points

Free of errors in grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling

(4 points)

1-4 errors in grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling.

(2 points)

5 or more errors in grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling.

(0 points)

other Questions(10)