Draft for paper

profileMiss LiaB0321

Please see the file attached

  • 2 years ago
  • 45
files (3)

Guideline.docx

Ethics, Philosophy, and Bias

Instructions

· To complete this Milestone Activity, read the question below and then provide your response in the comment box. In order to score a “Proficient” or “Exemplary”, your response must be thoughtful and substantive, and you must reference or cite content from this competency. Your tutorial faculty will use the rubric to determine if your post shows the depth of thought required to successfully complete this Milestone. Let’s get started.

· Review the attached Sacramento Police Department Crowd & Riot Control Manual. (Please see the attached file)

· Write a written response (1500 words) to the following prompts:

Review the attached Sacramento Police Department Crowd & Riot Control Manual. and read the following articles.

Sacramento Police Department Crowd & Riot Control Manual

Articles

1. Crowd Behavior, Crowd Control, and the Use of Non-Lethal Weapons

2. NEW DIRECTIONS IN PROTEST POLICING EDWARD R. MAGUIRE

3. Policing of Public Order

4. Stereotypes of Crowds and Collective Behavior: Looking Backward, Looking Forward

1.  Identify and discuss 10 directives or ways in which Sacramento's manual does or does not reflect or ascribe to the science. 

Consider: Does the manual address Couch's and others' critique of crowd and social movement stereotypes?  Does the manual integrate the ideas of scientists into guidelines to assist decision makers?  To what extent are theories reflected in the policy?  Is the notion of "professional protesters" versus "the opposition"; or "institutionalizing protests" versus "public order policing" integrated into guidelines?

2. Identify and discuss ways in which the manual has not adapted to social change and current circumstances.  Discuss any adaptations needed to protest policing policy in an "opposition to opposition" protest environment? ie KKK v. Civil rights protests,  Pro Choice v. Prolife protests, Black Lives Matter v. Not That Much protests.

RUBRIC

Emerging

Developing

Proficient

Exemplary

Quality of Post

Does not answer the posted question(s); Post is not thoughtful or substantive.

Somewhat answers the posted question(s); Post is lacking in thought and substance.

Mostly answers the posted question(s); Post shows some thoughtfulness and substance; Post synthesizes, applies or integrates concepts.

Fully answers the question(s); Post is substantive and shows a deep level of understanding of the concepts; Post synthesizes, applies, and/or integrates concepts effectively.

Connections to Content

Post does not include any connections to content. Does not use any direct/indirect quotes or references.

Post does not include any obvious connections to content. Does not use any direct/indirect quotes or references.

Post includes connections to competency content; Includes direct quotes, indirect quotes, or references the content from the competency.

Post includes obvious and direct connections to competency content; May include direct/indirect quotes and references the content from the competency.

Originality

Post has identical parts from other resources; does not demonstrate an independent thought process.

Post is similar to other resources; may not demonstrate an independent thought process.

Post is original and may demonstrate an independent thought process that is somewhat creative and individualized. Post may contain novel points or perspectives.

Post is original and demonstrates an independent thought process that is creative and individualized. Post adds value by raising novel points or providing new perspectives.

Writing Mechanics

Post is not written clearly; Includes many errors in sentence structure, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

Post is somewhat clearly written; There may be errors in sentence structure, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation that affect readability.

Post is clearly written; There may be a few minor errors in sentence structure grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

Post is concise and clearly written in an academic tone; Sentences are complete; spelling, grammar and punctuation are correct.