Discussion/ Response

profileACE.M

Read and answer the context: 

The Paradis article allows some very practical assembly of several concepts we've studied so far - the role of the technical writer, legality, genre, ethics, and technology. The endnotes describe some of the origins of the studgun, which may suggest it is not inherently a construction technology... but the question that hovers around this article for me is  "who is responsible?

Mirel's piece constitutes an argument for a rhetorical understanding and pedagogy of data reports - no surprise, again, given our previous readings. I wonder - is there a problem in technical communication that cannot be blithely answered by asking for a more rhetorical-critical-contextual understanding of documents, data, and the people assembling and composing them?

  • 6 years ago
  • 8
Answer(1)

Purchase the answer to view it

blurred-text
  • attachment
    Readingresponse1.docx
other Questions(10)