Discussion Post
Although in the past Congress was responsible for picking the U.S. Supreme Court docket, the Supreme Court justices have great autonomy to pick the cases they want to hear. Annually, almost 99% of all cases appealed to the Supreme Court are denied. What kinds of factors do you think go into which cases are heard? Cases are denied without an explanation—do you think that it is a good idea for the Supreme Court to set its own docket with no accountability for how or why they hear a case? How would responding to every case change the work of the Supreme Court? Explain.
5 years ago
6
Answer(1)![blurred-text]()
![]()
Purchase the answer to view it

- CriminalJusticeSystem.docx
other Questions(10)
- Analysis Paper
- Case study on singapore airlines, reacting to Asian crisis
- ASSIGNMENT SIX: Please see the film Shattered Glass (Lionsgate, 2004). You should be able to find the film online here or...
- Summarize the movie THE SOLOIST using theories, concepts, information learned from General Psychology 101 ( Example: Her mother had marital discord due to environmental stressors.)
- WWF
- Assignment 2: Trials and Verdicts
- FIN_317 Paper
- DUE ON FRIDAY
- Marketing Extra credit questions
- FOR NYANYA (ONLY) - Week 5 DQ (HINT 209)