discussion 5 nur 603
yari02
2 days ago
10
files (1)Module5Discussioninstructions.docx
Module5Discussioninstructions.docx
Module 5 Discussion
Creating an Abstract
Directions:
After studying Module 5: Lecture Materials & Resources , discuss the following:
Part I: Describe the components of an abstract.
· Share your abstract draft and provide feedback to peers on their abstracts.
· Include one (1 ) positive and one (1) room for improvement.
· Focus on the following for a quality abstract:
· Clarity and conciseness- It is easy to understand.
· Completeness- Covers all the essential elements of the project.
· Effectiveness- Captures the attention of the reader.
· Significance- Addresses the reason and significance of the project to practice or patient outcomes.
Part II: Briefly describe cultural influence on continuous quality improvement in healthcare settings.
Submission Requirements:
· Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style.
· All paragraphs must have 5 sentences.
· All references must be cited.
· All references must have “doi”, if applicable.
· No AI detectable, no plagiarism, Turnitin similarity report must be less than 5%.
Grading Rubric
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric, which is found by clicking the three dots in the upper right-hand corner and selecting "show rubric" from the menu.
Discussion Rubric
|
Discussion Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Points |
|
Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts |
Distinguished Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts. 5 to >4 pts Excellent Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of most issues, problems, and concepts. 4 to >3 pts Fair Identifies and demonstrates an acceptable understanding of most issues, problems, and concepts. 3 to >0 pts Poor Identifies and demonstrates an unacceptable understanding of most issues, problems, and concepts. Or nothing was posted. 0 pts |
Criterion Score /5 pts |
|
Comment |
||
|
Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines |
Distinguished Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors. 3 pts Excellent Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors. 2 pts Fair Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. 1 pts Poor Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. Or nothing was posted. 0 pts |
Criterion Score /3 pts |
|
Comment |
||
|
Peer Responses |
Distinguished Constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal to each. 2 pts Fair Constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal. 1 pts Poor Provided no response to a peer's post. 0 pts |
Criterion Score /2 pts |
|
Comment |
image1.png
Module5Discussioninstructions.docx
Module 5 Discussion
Creating an Abstract
Directions:
After studying Module 5: Lecture Materials & Resources , discuss the following:
Part I: Describe the components of an abstract.
· Share your abstract draft and provide feedback to peers on their abstracts.
· Include one (1 ) positive and one (1) room for improvement.
· Focus on the following for a quality abstract:
· Clarity and conciseness- It is easy to understand.
· Completeness- Covers all the essential elements of the project.
· Effectiveness- Captures the attention of the reader.
· Significance- Addresses the reason and significance of the project to practice or patient outcomes.
Part II: Briefly describe cultural influence on continuous quality improvement in healthcare settings.
Submission Requirements:
· Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style.
· All paragraphs must have 5 sentences.
· All references must be cited.
· All references must have “doi”, if applicable.
· No AI detectable, no plagiarism, Turnitin similarity report must be less than 5%.
Grading Rubric
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric, which is found by clicking the three dots in the upper right-hand corner and selecting "show rubric" from the menu.
Discussion Rubric
|
Discussion Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Points |
|
Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts |
Distinguished Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts. 5 to >4 pts Excellent Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of most issues, problems, and concepts. 4 to >3 pts Fair Identifies and demonstrates an acceptable understanding of most issues, problems, and concepts. 3 to >0 pts Poor Identifies and demonstrates an unacceptable understanding of most issues, problems, and concepts. Or nothing was posted. 0 pts |
Criterion Score /5 pts |
|
Comment |
||
|
Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines |
Distinguished Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors. 3 pts Excellent Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors. 2 pts Fair Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. 1 pts Poor Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. Or nothing was posted. 0 pts |
Criterion Score /3 pts |
|
Comment |
||
|
Peer Responses |
Distinguished Constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal to each. 2 pts Fair Constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal. 1 pts Poor Provided no response to a peer's post. 0 pts |
Criterion Score /2 pts |
|
Comment |
