Discussion 5 706
2 years ago
8
Discussion5706.docx
Discussion5706.docx
Week 5 Discussion: Roles and Responsibilities for Change
300 word response 2 references/intext citation Due 2/2/2024
1. Review pages 434 to 445 in Senge et. al. (2012).
a. This section provides a case study that recounts events that transpired from 1991 to 2007 in the Kentwood Public School District in Michigan.
b. The case sets the stage for examining Systems Thinking and deconstructing the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders for change that map to key action items from the National School Board Association's Framework (See Page 437) in Senge. et. al., (2012).
c. This case (Senge et. al., p. 437, 2012) denotes that communication across stakeholder groups is at the core of creating a shared vision. It goes on to affirm that stakeholder groups/learning groups when put together serve to fuel change. Likewise, the case highlighted that “no action was taken in isolation.” (p. 437); thus revealing, at least in part, the extent to which Systems Thinking is integral to change management.
Objective
The purpose of this discussion is for you to apply the NSBA Framework located on page 437 in Senge et. al. (2012) as a guide to understanding the dynamics surrounding a change initiative at the organization in which you work and to understand the key internal and external stakeholders that are involved in moving the change forward to reality.
Instructions for First Responsive Post
1. Identify a successful change initiative at the organization in which you work.
2. Identify and describe the roles and responsibilities of the internal and external stakeholders responsible for the change management processes Describe what learning groups, if any, were formed to support the initiative respectively.
3. From the 8 listed areas identified by the NSBA Framework (p. 437), select 3. Apply and discuss these key points in connection to the initiative you've described, the learning community, and in relation to change management processes and their effect on the success of the initiative.
4. Describe your role in the change initiative; and explain what, if any, responsibilities you had in connection to the initiative.
5. Describe what factors specifically affected the success of the initiative from your perspective. Is there anything different that could have been done?
image6.png
image7.png
image8.png
image9.png
image10.png
image11.png
image12.png
image13.png
image14.png
image15.png
image16.png
image17.png
image18.png
image19.png
image20.png
image21.png
image22.png
image23.png
image24.png
image25.png
image26.png
image27.png
image28.png
image29.png
image30.png
image31.png
image32.png
image33.png
image34.png
image35.png
image36.png
image37.png
image38.png
image39.png
image40.png
image41.png
image42.png
image43.png
image44.png
image45.png
image1.png
image46.png
image47.png
image48.png
image49.png
image50.png
image51.png
image52.png
image53.png
image54.png
image55.png
image2.png
image56.png
image3.png
image4.png
image5.png
- Research Paper
- wruting essay
- Ethics for Scientists
- EDU372: Educational Psychology journal
- history two half page paper no source
- Personality Theory Blog
- psy405
- Organizational Change 6
- please make sure you could finish before the deadline. The outline of argument paper
- 1. Calculator policies can vary from school to school and instructor to instructor. Some allow extensive use of calculators, while others restrict or prohibit their use. Should colleges allow the use of calculator in college algebra courses? Why or why