discussion
Tajfel and Turner (in chapter two of our reader) give us the following definition of Social Identity Theory: "SIT proposes that individuals make sense of their social environment by categorizing themselves and others into groups that can be contrasted with others" (Oksanen et al., 2014). SIT brings order to chaos, you might say, in that individuals define themselves as being different from everyone else.
Considering what we have read about the perpetrators of group violence, how do you suppose that it is that people make the leap from their own social identity to group violence? What social and psychological mechanisms are at work that would go from simple categorization to overt violence?
7 years ago
5
Answer(1)![blurred-text]()
![]()
Purchase the answer to view it

NOT RATED
- order_124731_322731.doc
other Questions(10)
- can some 3 answer questions
- Please help with homework
- LEG500 Assignment 5
- Zeek the Geek
- Discussion Question Responses
- Myths and Reality of Crime - Please read instructions in red
- program capstone 2 unit 4 DB
- Political thought-Written
- For Prof.Goodman Only
- Leadership Motivation Assessment (need by 9 pm tonight) "No Plagiarism"
